A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Three Walking Self-monitoring Strategies.

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Caroline R Richardson, David E Goodrich, Angela R Larkin, David Ronis, Robert G Holleman, Laura J Damschroder, Julie C Lowery
{"title":"A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Three Walking Self-monitoring Strategies.","authors":"Caroline R Richardson,&nbsp;David E Goodrich,&nbsp;Angela R Larkin,&nbsp;David Ronis,&nbsp;Robert G Holleman,&nbsp;Laura J Damschroder,&nbsp;Julie C Lowery","doi":"10.1249/TJX.0000000000000017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Walking programs improve health outcomes in adults at risk for cardiovascular disease and self-monitoring strategies can improve adherence to such programs. The objective of this study was to determine if a six-month internet-based walking program using web-enhanced pedometers results in more weight loss than walking programs based on time or simple pedometer-step count goals in adults with or at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multi-site, randomized controlled trial of 255 male Veterans who were ambulatory, insufficiently active, BMI ≥ 28, and who reported 1 ≥ CVD risk factors. Participants were randomized to one of three self-monitoring strategies to increase walking: (1) time-based walking goals; (2) simple pedometer-based walking goals; and (3) web-enhanced pedometer feedback goals with Internet-mediated feedback. All participants also attended five individual weight loss sessions with a dietitian. The main outcome measure was change in weight at six months (kg) and secondary outcomes were change in accelerometer-measured physical activity (min) and change in health-related quality of life at six months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 255 participants had a mean age of 56.3 years (SD = 10.0), BMI=36.3 (SD = 5.3) with a mean of 5.2 (SD = 2.3) medical comorbidities. Dropouts were distributed evenly across the three groups and 72% of participants completed the program. At six months, participants in the web-enhanced pedometer arm lost significantly more weight (-1.9 kg, 95% CI=-2.7, -1.1) than those in the time-based group (-0.7 kg, 95% CI=-1.5, 0.0; p = 0.04) and simple pedometer group (-0.6 kg, 95% CI=-1.4, 0.2; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Internet-enhanced pedometers result in greater weight loss in Veterans than walking programs using time-based walking goals or simple pedometers.</p>","PeriodicalId":75243,"journal":{"name":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","volume":"1 15","pages":"133-142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/99/79/tjx-1-133.PMC5435380.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/TJX.0000000000000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: Walking programs improve health outcomes in adults at risk for cardiovascular disease and self-monitoring strategies can improve adherence to such programs. The objective of this study was to determine if a six-month internet-based walking program using web-enhanced pedometers results in more weight loss than walking programs based on time or simple pedometer-step count goals in adults with or at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Methods: This was a multi-site, randomized controlled trial of 255 male Veterans who were ambulatory, insufficiently active, BMI ≥ 28, and who reported 1 ≥ CVD risk factors. Participants were randomized to one of three self-monitoring strategies to increase walking: (1) time-based walking goals; (2) simple pedometer-based walking goals; and (3) web-enhanced pedometer feedback goals with Internet-mediated feedback. All participants also attended five individual weight loss sessions with a dietitian. The main outcome measure was change in weight at six months (kg) and secondary outcomes were change in accelerometer-measured physical activity (min) and change in health-related quality of life at six months.

Results: The 255 participants had a mean age of 56.3 years (SD = 10.0), BMI=36.3 (SD = 5.3) with a mean of 5.2 (SD = 2.3) medical comorbidities. Dropouts were distributed evenly across the three groups and 72% of participants completed the program. At six months, participants in the web-enhanced pedometer arm lost significantly more weight (-1.9 kg, 95% CI=-2.7, -1.1) than those in the time-based group (-0.7 kg, 95% CI=-1.5, 0.0; p = 0.04) and simple pedometer group (-0.6 kg, 95% CI=-1.4, 0.2; p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Internet-enhanced pedometers result in greater weight loss in Veterans than walking programs using time-based walking goals or simple pedometers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

三种步行自我监测策略的疗效比较研究。
目的:步行计划可以改善心血管疾病风险的成年人的健康状况,自我监测策略可以提高对此类计划的依从性。本研究的目的是确定在患有或有心血管疾病(CVD)风险的成年人中,使用网络增强型计步器进行为期六个月的基于互联网的步行计划是否比基于时间或简单计步器-步数目标的步行计划更能减轻体重。方法:这是一项多中心、随机对照试验,255名男性退伍军人,活动不足,BMI≥28,报告1≥CVD危险因素。参与者被随机分配到三种自我监测策略中的一种,以增加步行量:(1)基于时间的步行目标;(2)基于计步器的简单步行目标;(3)基于网络的计步器反馈目标。所有参与者还在营养师的指导下参加了五次个人减肥课程。主要结局指标是6个月时体重的变化(kg),次要结局指标是6个月时加速度计测量的身体活动(min)的变化和健康相关生活质量的变化。结果:255名参与者的平均年龄为56.3岁(SD = 10.0), BMI=36.3 (SD = 5.3),平均有5.2 (SD = 2.3)的医学合并症。辍学者平均分布在三组中,72%的参与者完成了这个项目。在6个月时,网络增强计步器组的参与者比基于时间的组(-0.7 kg, 95% CI=-1.5, 0.0;p = 0.04)和简单计步器组(-0.6 kg, 95% CI=-1.4, 0.2;P = 0.02)。结论:互联网增强的计步器比使用基于时间的步行目标或简单的计步器的步行计划更能减轻退伍军人的体重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信