Utility of a multimodal neurophysiologic assessment tool in distinguishing between individuals with and without a history of mild traumatic brain injury.

Q Medicine
Martin Baruch, Jeffrey T Barth, David Cifu, Martin Leibman
{"title":"Utility of a multimodal neurophysiologic assessment tool in distinguishing between individuals with and without a history of mild traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Martin Baruch,&nbsp;Jeffrey T Barth,&nbsp;David Cifu,&nbsp;Martin Leibman","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2015.06.0120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This was a preliminary validation study of a multimodal concussion assessment battery incorporating eye-tracking, balance, and neurocognitive tests on a new hardware platform, the Computerized Brain Injury Assessment System. Using receiver-operating characteristics analyses, (1) we identified a subset of the most discriminating neurophysiological assessment tests involving smooth pursuit eye movement tracking errors, corrective saccade counts, a balance score ratio sensitive to vestibular balance performance, and two neurocognitive tests of response speed and memory/incidental learning; (2) we demonstrated the enhancement in discriminatory capability of detecting concussion-related deficits through the combination of the identified subset of assessments; and (3) we demonstrated the effectiveness of a robust and readily implemented global scoring approach was demonstrated for both eye track and balance assessment tests. These results are significant in introducing a comprehensive solution for concussion assessment that incorporates an economical, compact, and mobile hardware system and an assessment battery that is multimodal and time efficient and whose efficacy has been demonstrated on a preliminary basis. This represents a significant step toward the goal of a system capable of making a dependable return-to-play/duty determination based on concussion likelihood.</p>","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2015.06.0120","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.06.0120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This was a preliminary validation study of a multimodal concussion assessment battery incorporating eye-tracking, balance, and neurocognitive tests on a new hardware platform, the Computerized Brain Injury Assessment System. Using receiver-operating characteristics analyses, (1) we identified a subset of the most discriminating neurophysiological assessment tests involving smooth pursuit eye movement tracking errors, corrective saccade counts, a balance score ratio sensitive to vestibular balance performance, and two neurocognitive tests of response speed and memory/incidental learning; (2) we demonstrated the enhancement in discriminatory capability of detecting concussion-related deficits through the combination of the identified subset of assessments; and (3) we demonstrated the effectiveness of a robust and readily implemented global scoring approach was demonstrated for both eye track and balance assessment tests. These results are significant in introducing a comprehensive solution for concussion assessment that incorporates an economical, compact, and mobile hardware system and an assessment battery that is multimodal and time efficient and whose efficacy has been demonstrated on a preliminary basis. This represents a significant step toward the goal of a system capable of making a dependable return-to-play/duty determination based on concussion likelihood.

多模式神经生理学评估工具在区分有和没有轻度创伤性脑损伤史的个体中的应用。
这是一个多模式脑震荡评估电池的初步验证研究,包括眼球追踪、平衡和神经认知测试,在一个新的硬件平台上,计算机脑损伤评估系统。通过对接受者操作特征的分析,(1)我们确定了一组最具区别性的神经生理评估测试,包括平滑追踪眼动跟踪误差、矫正扫视计数、对前庭平衡表现敏感的平衡评分比率,以及两项反应速度和记忆/偶然学习的神经认知测试;(2)我们展示了通过结合已识别的评估子集来检测脑震荡相关缺陷的歧视性能力的增强;(3)我们证明了一种稳健且易于实施的全局评分方法的有效性,该方法被证明适用于眼动轨迹和平衡评估测试。这些结果对于引入一种综合的脑震荡评估解决方案具有重要意义,该解决方案结合了一种经济、紧凑、可移动的硬件系统和一种多模式、省时的评估电池,其有效性已在初步基础上得到证明。这代表了朝着系统目标迈出的重要一步,该系统能够根据脑震荡的可能性做出可靠的重返比赛/任务决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.64
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信