The Value of a Surgical Assessment Unit Ultrasound Facility.

BMJ quality improvement reports Pub Date : 2017-04-27 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjquality.u209155.w3729
Wesley Lai, Catherine Gutteridge, Alicia Regan, Anthony Lambert
{"title":"The Value of a Surgical Assessment Unit Ultrasound Facility.","authors":"Wesley Lai,&nbsp;Catherine Gutteridge,&nbsp;Alicia Regan,&nbsp;Anthony Lambert","doi":"10.1136/bmjquality.u209155.w3729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ultrasound scan (USS) is a common and important mode of investigation for emergency surgical admissions. Delay in investigation often leads to delayed diagnosis and treatment, and possible extended length of stay (LOS), which has clinical, cost and service provision implications. We aim to investigate the clinical impact on patient care and the cost-effectiveness of a pilot Surgical Assessment Unit (SAU) USS facility. We performed a retrospective data collection on 100 consecutive SAU inpatients who had an USS investigation on the ward since the introduction of the facility, matched by 100 consecutive SAU inpatients who had an USS in the radiology department before the pilot study. Results of the audit show SAU USS has a reduced mean LOS by 1.44 days compared to departmental USS, and led to more same day discharge than departmental USS (20 vs. 5), thus avoiding unnecessary overnight stay. It also significantly reduced mean waiting time from admission to investigation by 5.21 hours, which can be translated into improved patient and staff satisfaction. All these findings are both statistically and clinically significant. The estimated cost of each SAU USS is comparable to the average departmental USS (£29.71 vs. £30.80). Using the average cost of an excess bed day = £273, SAU USS has produced an estimated saving of £394.72/patient. This does not include saved opportunistic costs such as prevented elective operation cancellations, fines incurred from surgery waiting time/A+E breaches etc. To conclude SAU USS has a significant positive impact on patient care in surgical admissions by reducing LOS and investigation waiting time, as well as facilitating same day discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":91218,"journal":{"name":"BMJ quality improvement reports","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjquality.u209155.w3729","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ quality improvement reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209155.w3729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Ultrasound scan (USS) is a common and important mode of investigation for emergency surgical admissions. Delay in investigation often leads to delayed diagnosis and treatment, and possible extended length of stay (LOS), which has clinical, cost and service provision implications. We aim to investigate the clinical impact on patient care and the cost-effectiveness of a pilot Surgical Assessment Unit (SAU) USS facility. We performed a retrospective data collection on 100 consecutive SAU inpatients who had an USS investigation on the ward since the introduction of the facility, matched by 100 consecutive SAU inpatients who had an USS in the radiology department before the pilot study. Results of the audit show SAU USS has a reduced mean LOS by 1.44 days compared to departmental USS, and led to more same day discharge than departmental USS (20 vs. 5), thus avoiding unnecessary overnight stay. It also significantly reduced mean waiting time from admission to investigation by 5.21 hours, which can be translated into improved patient and staff satisfaction. All these findings are both statistically and clinically significant. The estimated cost of each SAU USS is comparable to the average departmental USS (£29.71 vs. £30.80). Using the average cost of an excess bed day = £273, SAU USS has produced an estimated saving of £394.72/patient. This does not include saved opportunistic costs such as prevented elective operation cancellations, fines incurred from surgery waiting time/A+E breaches etc. To conclude SAU USS has a significant positive impact on patient care in surgical admissions by reducing LOS and investigation waiting time, as well as facilitating same day discharge.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

外科评估单位超声设备的价值。
超声扫描(USS)是一种常见和重要的调查模式急诊外科入院。调查延误往往导致诊断和治疗延误,并可能延长住院时间,这对临床、费用和服务提供都有影响。我们的目的是调查临床影响的病人护理和成本效益试点外科评估单位(SAU) USS设施。我们对100名自引进该设施以来在病房进行过USS调查的连续SAU住院患者进行了回顾性数据收集,并与100名在试点研究之前在放射科进行过USS的连续SAU住院患者进行了匹配。审计结果显示,SAU USS的平均工作时间比部门USS减少了1.44天,并且导致比部门USS更多的当天出院(20对5),从而避免了不必要的过夜住宿。它还显著减少了从入院到调查的平均等待时间5.21小时,这可以转化为提高患者和工作人员的满意度。所有这些发现都具有统计学和临床意义。每个SAU USS的估计成本与部门平均USS相当(29.71英镑对30.80英镑)。使用额外床位日的平均成本= 273英镑,SAU USS估计为每位患者节省了394.72英镑。这还不包括节省的机会性成本,如防止选择性手术取消,因手术等待时间/违反A+E规定而产生的罚款等。综上所述,SAU对外科住院患者的护理有显著的积极影响,减少了LOS和调查等待时间,并促进了当天出院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信