Improving access for Urgent patients in Paediatric Neurology.

BMJ quality improvement reports Pub Date : 2017-04-27 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjquality.u209266.w4648
Khalid Mohamed, Basema Al Houri, Khalid Ibrahim, Abdulhafeez M Khair
{"title":"Improving access for Urgent patients in Paediatric Neurology.","authors":"Khalid Mohamed,&nbsp;Basema Al Houri,&nbsp;Khalid Ibrahim,&nbsp;Abdulhafeez M Khair","doi":"10.1136/bmjquality.u209266.w4648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Referral and flow management is an important part of outpatient care; some patients require to be seen earlier than the next available appointment because of the nature of their presentation. We did not have a clear pathway for urgent patients being referred to our pediatric neurology service. When we reviewed this process in our Quality Improvement meeting we identified wide variation in the length of time such patients wait to be seen in clinic ranging from 2 to 11 weeks. Only 25% of patients identified as requiring urgent clinic appointments were seen in clinic within 2 weeks of triage. A new triage system was designed to identify urgent patients consistently. Three PDSA cycles tested change ideas: the first cycle tested introducing an urgent triage system, the second cycle tested giving urgent appointments directly from the triage decision utilising clinic cancellations and the third PDSA tested double notification of appointments for all urgent patients using the call centre and the neurology specialist nurses. After the third PDSA the percentage of patients seen within 2 weeks of triage increased from 25% to 80%. This change was tested across one clinic initially then tested across two more clinics. Our balancing measure, the third available routine appointment, remained stable indicating that improving access to emergency patients did not affect the waiting time for routine appointments. With good management of triage it is possible to improve access for urgent patients to be seen in clinic without impact on availability of routine appointments, resulting in better quality of care and patient satisfaction. Earlier appointments also improve clinic attendance rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":91218,"journal":{"name":"BMJ quality improvement reports","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjquality.u209266.w4648","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ quality improvement reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209266.w4648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Referral and flow management is an important part of outpatient care; some patients require to be seen earlier than the next available appointment because of the nature of their presentation. We did not have a clear pathway for urgent patients being referred to our pediatric neurology service. When we reviewed this process in our Quality Improvement meeting we identified wide variation in the length of time such patients wait to be seen in clinic ranging from 2 to 11 weeks. Only 25% of patients identified as requiring urgent clinic appointments were seen in clinic within 2 weeks of triage. A new triage system was designed to identify urgent patients consistently. Three PDSA cycles tested change ideas: the first cycle tested introducing an urgent triage system, the second cycle tested giving urgent appointments directly from the triage decision utilising clinic cancellations and the third PDSA tested double notification of appointments for all urgent patients using the call centre and the neurology specialist nurses. After the third PDSA the percentage of patients seen within 2 weeks of triage increased from 25% to 80%. This change was tested across one clinic initially then tested across two more clinics. Our balancing measure, the third available routine appointment, remained stable indicating that improving access to emergency patients did not affect the waiting time for routine appointments. With good management of triage it is possible to improve access for urgent patients to be seen in clinic without impact on availability of routine appointments, resulting in better quality of care and patient satisfaction. Earlier appointments also improve clinic attendance rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

改善儿科神经病学急症患者的可及性。
转诊和流量管理是门诊护理的重要组成部分;有些病人由于病情需要,需要比下次预约时间提前就诊。我们没有一个明确的途径,紧急病人被转介到我们的儿科神经病学服务。当我们在质量改进会议上回顾这一过程时,我们发现这些患者在临床等待时间的长短差异很大,从2周到11周不等。只有25%被确定需要紧急门诊预约的患者在分诊后2周内就诊。设计了一个新的分诊系统,以一致地识别紧急病人。三个PDSA周期测试了改变想法:第一个周期测试了引入紧急分诊系统,第二个周期测试了利用诊所取消直接从分诊决定中提供紧急预约,第三个PDSA测试了使用呼叫中心和神经病学专家护士对所有紧急患者的预约进行双重通知。第三次PDSA后,两周内就诊的患者比例从25%增加到80%。这个变化最初在一个诊所进行了测试,然后在另外两个诊所进行了测试。我们的平衡措施,即第三次常规预约,保持稳定,表明改善急诊患者的就诊机会并不影响常规预约的等待时间。通过良好的分诊管理,有可能在不影响常规预约的情况下改善急诊患者在诊所就诊的机会,从而提高护理质量和患者满意度。提前预约也提高了诊所的出勤率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信