Assessment of Clinical Symptoms in Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.

Korean Journal of Spine Pub Date : 2017-03-01 Epub Date: 2017-03-31 DOI:10.14245/kjs.2017.14.1.1
Yawara Eguchi, Munetaka Suzuki, Hajime Yamanaka, Hiroshi Tamai, Tatsuya Kobayashi, Sumihisa Orita, Kazuyo Yamauchi, Miyako Suzuki, Kazuhide Inage, Hirohito Kanamoto, Koki Abe, Yasuchika Aoki, Masao Koda, Takeo Furuya, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Seiji Ohtori
{"title":"Assessment of Clinical Symptoms in Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.","authors":"Yawara Eguchi,&nbsp;Munetaka Suzuki,&nbsp;Hajime Yamanaka,&nbsp;Hiroshi Tamai,&nbsp;Tatsuya Kobayashi,&nbsp;Sumihisa Orita,&nbsp;Kazuyo Yamauchi,&nbsp;Miyako Suzuki,&nbsp;Kazuhide Inage,&nbsp;Hirohito Kanamoto,&nbsp;Koki Abe,&nbsp;Yasuchika Aoki,&nbsp;Masao Koda,&nbsp;Takeo Furuya,&nbsp;Kazuhisa Takahashi,&nbsp;Seiji Ohtori","doi":"10.14245/kjs.2017.14.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is important to develop an easy means of diagnosing lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) in a general practice setting. We investigated the use of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) to diagnose LFS in symptomatic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects included 13 cases (mean age, 72 years) with LFS, and 30 cases (mean age, 73 years) with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) involving one intervertebral disc. The visual analogue scale score for low back pain and leg pain, the JOABPEQ were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those with LFS had a significantly lower JOA score (p<0.001), while JOABPEQ scores (p<0.05) for lumbar dysfunction and social functioning impairment (p<0.01) were both significantly lower than the scores in LSCS. The following JOABPEQ questionnaire items (LFS vs. LSCS, p-value) for difficulties in: sleeping (53.8% vs. 16.6%, p<0.05), getting up from a chair (53.8% vs. 6.6%, p<0.001), turning over (76.9% vs. 40%, p<0.05), and putting on socks (76.9% vs. 26.6%, p<0.01) such as pain during rest, and signs of intermittent claudication more than 15 minutes (61.5% vs. 26.6%, p<0.05) were all significantly more common with LFS than LSCS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest that of the items in the JOABPEQ, if pain during rest or intermittent claudication is noted, LFS should be kept in mind as a cause during subsequent diagnosis and treatment. LFS may be easily diagnosed from LSCS using this established patient-based assessment method.</p>","PeriodicalId":17867,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e6/f5/kjs-14-1-1.PMC5402862.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2017.14.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objective: It is important to develop an easy means of diagnosing lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) in a general practice setting. We investigated the use of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) to diagnose LFS in symptomatic patients.

Methods: Subjects included 13 cases (mean age, 72 years) with LFS, and 30 cases (mean age, 73 years) with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) involving one intervertebral disc. The visual analogue scale score for low back pain and leg pain, the JOABPEQ were evaluated.

Results: Those with LFS had a significantly lower JOA score (p<0.001), while JOABPEQ scores (p<0.05) for lumbar dysfunction and social functioning impairment (p<0.01) were both significantly lower than the scores in LSCS. The following JOABPEQ questionnaire items (LFS vs. LSCS, p-value) for difficulties in: sleeping (53.8% vs. 16.6%, p<0.05), getting up from a chair (53.8% vs. 6.6%, p<0.001), turning over (76.9% vs. 40%, p<0.05), and putting on socks (76.9% vs. 26.6%, p<0.01) such as pain during rest, and signs of intermittent claudication more than 15 minutes (61.5% vs. 26.6%, p<0.05) were all significantly more common with LFS than LSCS.

Conclusion: Results suggest that of the items in the JOABPEQ, if pain during rest or intermittent claudication is noted, LFS should be kept in mind as a cause during subsequent diagnosis and treatment. LFS may be easily diagnosed from LSCS using this established patient-based assessment method.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用日本骨科协会背痛评估问卷评估腰椎椎间孔狭窄症的临床症状。
目的:发展一种简便的诊断腰椎椎间孔狭窄(LFS)的方法在全科实践中是很重要的。我们研究了使用日本骨科协会背痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)来诊断有症状患者的LFS。方法:纳入13例LFS患者(平均年龄72岁)和30例腰椎管狭窄(LSCS)累及一侧椎间盘患者(平均年龄73岁)。对腰痛和腿痛的视觉模拟量表评分、JOABPEQ进行评估。结果:LFS患者的JOA评分明显较低(p)。结论:结果提示,在JOABPEQ的项目中,如果发现休息时疼痛或间歇性跛行,在后续的诊断和治疗中应将LFS作为一个原因。使用这种基于患者的评估方法,可以很容易地从LSCS诊断LFS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信