Noise in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?

Sharon G Casavant, Katherine Bernier, Sheena Andrews, Allison Bourgoin
{"title":"Noise in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?","authors":"Sharon G Casavant,&nbsp;Katherine Bernier,&nbsp;Sheena Andrews,&nbsp;Allison Bourgoin","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000000402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2014, more than 10% of all births in the United States were preterm (born at <37-weeks' gestation). These high-risk infants will often spend weeks to months within the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), where noise levels can easily reach 120 decibels adjusted (dBA) on a regular and sometimes consistent basis. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that NICU sound levels remain below 45 dBA to promote optimal growth and development.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this evidence-based brief is to critically appraise the literature concerning preterm infant response to noise within the NICU as well as the use of noise interventions to improve health outcomes for the vulnerable preterm infant population.</p><p><strong>Methods/search strategy: </strong>Systematic searches of databases included the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, and Science Direct. Included studies were appraised and then synthesized into a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Findings/results: </strong>Twenty studies met inclusion criteria for this review. While there are numerous methods that have been shown to reduce noise levels within the NICU, most NICU noise levels remain consistently above the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations. Studies that assessed interventions found that staff reeducation was critical to sustaining appropriate noise levels.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Implementing interventions with rigorous attention to initial and continued staff education with engagement and ownership is recommended. This review identifies gaps in intervention studies targeting vulnerable NICU populations.</p><p><strong>Implications for research: </strong>While noise interventions show promise in the NICU, additional focused research is needed to further strengthen the evidence and inform clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":520547,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"265-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000402","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Background: In 2014, more than 10% of all births in the United States were preterm (born at <37-weeks' gestation). These high-risk infants will often spend weeks to months within the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), where noise levels can easily reach 120 decibels adjusted (dBA) on a regular and sometimes consistent basis. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that NICU sound levels remain below 45 dBA to promote optimal growth and development.

Purpose: The purpose of this evidence-based brief is to critically appraise the literature concerning preterm infant response to noise within the NICU as well as the use of noise interventions to improve health outcomes for the vulnerable preterm infant population.

Methods/search strategy: Systematic searches of databases included the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, and Science Direct. Included studies were appraised and then synthesized into a narrative summary.

Findings/results: Twenty studies met inclusion criteria for this review. While there are numerous methods that have been shown to reduce noise levels within the NICU, most NICU noise levels remain consistently above the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations. Studies that assessed interventions found that staff reeducation was critical to sustaining appropriate noise levels.

Implications for practice: Implementing interventions with rigorous attention to initial and continued staff education with engagement and ownership is recommended. This review identifies gaps in intervention studies targeting vulnerable NICU populations.

Implications for research: While noise interventions show promise in the NICU, additional focused research is needed to further strengthen the evidence and inform clinical practice.

新生儿重症监护病房的噪音:证据告诉我们什么?
背景:2014年,美国超过10%的新生儿是早产儿(出生时间:目的:本以证据为基础的简介的目的是批判性地评估有关新生儿重症监护室早产儿对噪音反应的文献,以及使用噪音干预来改善弱势早产儿群体的健康结果。方法/检索策略:系统检索数据库包括Cochrane Library、CINAHL、PubMed和Science Direct。对纳入的研究进行评价,然后综合成一份叙述性摘要。发现/结果:20项研究符合本综述的纳入标准。虽然有许多方法可以降低新生儿重症监护病房内的噪音水平,但大多数新生儿重症监护病房的噪音水平始终高于美国儿科学会的建议水平。评估干预措施的研究发现,工作人员再教育对于维持适当的噪音水平至关重要。对实践的影响:建议实施干预措施,严格关注员工参与和所有权的初始和持续教育。本综述确定了针对新生儿重症监护室弱势人群的干预研究的差距。研究意义:虽然噪音干预在新生儿重症监护室显示出希望,但需要进一步的重点研究来进一步加强证据并为临床实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信