Evaluation of bacille Calmette-Guérin immunisation programs in Australia.

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Communicable Diseases Intelligence Pub Date : 2017-03-31
Gulam Khandaker, Frank H Beard, Aditi Dey, Chris Coulter, Alexandra J Hendry, Kristine K Macartney
{"title":"Evaluation of bacille Calmette-Guérin immunisation programs in Australia.","authors":"Gulam Khandaker,&nbsp;Frank H Beard,&nbsp;Aditi Dey,&nbsp;Chris Coulter,&nbsp;Alexandra J Hendry,&nbsp;Kristine K Macartney","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunisation programs in Australia are funded and operated by the individual states and territories. In recent years BCG vaccine shortages have required use of unregistered products. We aimed to evaluate BCG immunisation programs in Australia, with particular reference to program implementation and national consistency.\u2029 Methods: Between September and November 2015, 12 key stakeholders, representing Australian states and territories, completed surveys. We analysed BCG vaccination coverage data from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR), and data on adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) with BCG vaccine from the Therapeutic Goods Administration's Adverse Drug Reactions System, for 2001 to 2014.\u2029 Results: Access to BCG vaccination varies between jurisdictions, with some states providing this only in major city locations. Analysis of ACIR data suggests significant differences in vaccine delivery between jurisdictions, but varying levels of under-reporting to the ACIR were also acknowledged. The rate of BCG AEFI appeared to increase between 2011 and 2014; however, these data need to be interpreted with caution due to small numbers, likely under-reporting of both numerator (AEFI) and denominator (vaccine doses administered), and the general increase in reporting of AEFI related to other vaccines in children over this period.\u2029 Conclusions: BCG immunisation programs aim to prevent severe forms of tuberculosis in young children who live in or travel to high burden settings. A range of factors, particularly inconsistent vaccine supply are leading to low, variable and inequitable vaccine delivery across Australian jurisdictions. Improved BCG vaccination uptake and AEFI data quality are required for accurate monitoring of program delivery and vaccine safety - this is particularly important given the current need to use unregistered vaccines. Improved and consistent access to BCG vaccine is suggested to optimise equity for at-risk children Australia-wide.</p>","PeriodicalId":51669,"journal":{"name":"Communicable Diseases Intelligence","volume":"41 1","pages":"E33-E48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicable Diseases Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunisation programs in Australia are funded and operated by the individual states and territories. In recent years BCG vaccine shortages have required use of unregistered products. We aimed to evaluate BCG immunisation programs in Australia, with particular reference to program implementation and national consistency.
 Methods: Between September and November 2015, 12 key stakeholders, representing Australian states and territories, completed surveys. We analysed BCG vaccination coverage data from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR), and data on adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) with BCG vaccine from the Therapeutic Goods Administration's Adverse Drug Reactions System, for 2001 to 2014.
 Results: Access to BCG vaccination varies between jurisdictions, with some states providing this only in major city locations. Analysis of ACIR data suggests significant differences in vaccine delivery between jurisdictions, but varying levels of under-reporting to the ACIR were also acknowledged. The rate of BCG AEFI appeared to increase between 2011 and 2014; however, these data need to be interpreted with caution due to small numbers, likely under-reporting of both numerator (AEFI) and denominator (vaccine doses administered), and the general increase in reporting of AEFI related to other vaccines in children over this period.
 Conclusions: BCG immunisation programs aim to prevent severe forms of tuberculosis in young children who live in or travel to high burden settings. A range of factors, particularly inconsistent vaccine supply are leading to low, variable and inequitable vaccine delivery across Australian jurisdictions. Improved BCG vaccination uptake and AEFI data quality are required for accurate monitoring of program delivery and vaccine safety - this is particularly important given the current need to use unregistered vaccines. Improved and consistent access to BCG vaccine is suggested to optimise equity for at-risk children Australia-wide.

澳大利亚卡尔梅特-古萨林杆菌免疫接种项目的评价。
背景:澳大利亚的卡介苗免疫规划由各州和地区资助和运作。近年来,由于卡介苗短缺,需要使用未注册的产品。我们的目的是评估澳大利亚的卡介苗免疫规划,特别是规划实施和国家一致性。
方法:2015年9月至11月期间,代表澳大利亚各州和地区的12个关键利益相关者完成了调查。我们分析了2001年至2014年来自澳大利亚儿童免疫登记(ACIR)的卡介苗接种覆盖率数据,以及来自美国药品管理局不良药物反应系统(Therapeutic Goods Administration’s adverse Drug Reactions System)的卡介苗免疫(AEFI)不良事件数据。
结果:获得卡介苗接种因司法管辖区而异,一些州仅在主要城市地区提供。对ACIR数据的分析表明,不同司法管辖区在疫苗交付方面存在显著差异,但也承认对ACIR的低报程度不同。2011 - 2014年卡介苗AEFI发生率呈上升趋势;然而,这些数据需要谨慎解释,因为数字小,分子(AEFI)和分母(接种的疫苗剂量)可能都未被报告,并且在此期间报告的与其他疫苗相关的儿童AEFI普遍增加。
结论:卡介苗免疫规划旨在预防生活在高负担环境或前往高负担环境的幼儿的严重结核病。一系列因素,特别是疫苗供应不一致,导致澳大利亚各司法管辖区的疫苗供应低、不稳定和不公平。需要提高卡介苗接种率和AEFI数据质量,以便准确监测规划的实施和疫苗安全性——鉴于目前需要使用未注册疫苗,这一点尤为重要。建议改善和持续获得卡介苗,以优化澳大利亚范围内高危儿童的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communicable Diseases Intelligence
Communicable Diseases Intelligence INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
自引率
16.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信