Women's Joint Decision on Contraceptive Use in Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Community Based Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

International journal of family medicine Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-03-07 DOI:10.1155/2017/9389072
Akine Eshete, Yohannes Adissu
{"title":"Women's Joint Decision on Contraceptive Use in Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Community Based Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Akine Eshete,&nbsp;Yohannes Adissu","doi":"10.1155/2017/9389072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A community based comparative cross-sectional study design was employed to assess the mutual consent of women about family planning use in urban and rural villages of Gedeo zone. Two-thirds (67.4%) of women made joint decision on contraceptive use, varying between urban (70.9%) and rural (63.4%) settings. This difference was statistically significant where women in urban setup had a 41% (AOR, 1.41; 95% CI (1.15, 2.01) added chance of making joint decision than the rural counterpart. In both settings, attitude towards contraceptive method was an independent predictor of joint contraceptive decision (AOR = 2.85) in urban and (AOR = 2.81) rural women. Contrarily, different factors were found to be associated with joint contraceptive decision in either setup. In urban, having better knowledge about contraceptive methods (AOR = 2.9) and having lower age difference (AOR = 2.2) were found to be strong predictors of joint decision on contraceptive use, while having too many children (AOR = 2.2) and paternal support (AOR = 7.1) in rural setups. Lower level of joint decision making on contraceptive use was reported in both setups. Factors associated with joint decision varied between the two setups, except for attitude towards contraceptive methods. Future family planning program should address sociocultural, knowledge and attitude factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":89569,"journal":{"name":"International journal of family medicine","volume":"2017 ","pages":"9389072"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/9389072","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9389072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

A community based comparative cross-sectional study design was employed to assess the mutual consent of women about family planning use in urban and rural villages of Gedeo zone. Two-thirds (67.4%) of women made joint decision on contraceptive use, varying between urban (70.9%) and rural (63.4%) settings. This difference was statistically significant where women in urban setup had a 41% (AOR, 1.41; 95% CI (1.15, 2.01) added chance of making joint decision than the rural counterpart. In both settings, attitude towards contraceptive method was an independent predictor of joint contraceptive decision (AOR = 2.85) in urban and (AOR = 2.81) rural women. Contrarily, different factors were found to be associated with joint contraceptive decision in either setup. In urban, having better knowledge about contraceptive methods (AOR = 2.9) and having lower age difference (AOR = 2.2) were found to be strong predictors of joint decision on contraceptive use, while having too many children (AOR = 2.2) and paternal support (AOR = 7.1) in rural setups. Lower level of joint decision making on contraceptive use was reported in both setups. Factors associated with joint decision varied between the two setups, except for attitude towards contraceptive methods. Future family planning program should address sociocultural, knowledge and attitude factors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

埃塞俄比亚南部Gedeo地区妇女对避孕药具使用的共同决定:一项基于社区的比较横断面研究。
采用以社区为基础的比较横断面研究设计,对吉德奥地区城乡妇女计划生育使用意愿进行评估。三分之二(67.4%)的妇女共同决定使用避孕药具,在城市(70.9%)和农村(63.4%)环境中有所不同。这一差异在统计学上具有显著意义,其中城市女性的AOR为41% (AOR, 1.41;95% CI(1.15, 2.01)比农村同行增加了共同决策的机会。在这两种情况下,对避孕方法的态度是城市妇女联合避孕决定的独立预测因子(AOR = 2.85)和农村妇女(AOR = 2.81)。相反,不同的因素被发现与联合避孕决定在任何设置。在城市地区,对避孕方法了解程度较高(AOR = 2.9)和年龄差异较小(AOR = 2.2)是共同决定使用避孕措施的重要预测因素,而在农村地区,子女过多(AOR = 2.2)和父亲支持(AOR = 7.1)是共同决定使用避孕措施的重要预测因素。据报道,在这两个机构中,共同决定避孕药具使用的水平较低。除了对避孕方法的态度外,与共同决定有关的因素在两种情况下有所不同。今后的计划生育工作应解决社会文化、知识和态度等因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信