Recent Progress in the Prevention of Serogroup B Meningococcal Disease.

Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Pub Date : 2017-05-05 Print Date: 2017-05-01 DOI:10.1128/CVI.00566-16
Ian M Feavers, Martin C J Maiden
{"title":"Recent Progress in the Prevention of Serogroup B Meningococcal Disease.","authors":"Ian M Feavers,&nbsp;Martin C J Maiden","doi":"10.1128/CVI.00566-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The widespread use of meningococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccines has highlighted the challenge of providing protection against serogroup B disease. Over a period of 4 decades, vaccine development has focused on subcapsular protein antigens, first with outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccines against epidemic outbreaks, and more recently on new multicomponent vaccines designed to offer better cross-protection against the antigenically diverse strains responsible for endemic disease. Because of the low incidence of meningococcal disease, the protective efficacy of these vaccines has not been determined in clinical studies, and their licensure has been based on serological data; however, the serological assays used to predict protective coverage have limitations. As a result, evidence of the effectiveness of these vaccines against different strains and the contribution of specific antigens to protection can only be provided by epidemiological analyses following their implementation in sufficiently large populations. The recent inclusion of the four-component meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) vaccine, Bexsero, in the infant immunization program in the UK has provided preliminary evidence that the vaccine is effective. Ongoing surveillance will provide valuable data on its longer-term impact and antigenic coverage. Further development of protein-based vaccines against meningococcal disease is anticipated to improve antigenic coverage and adjust to changes in circulating strains. At the same time, alternative immunization strategies may be explored to improve overall vaccine effectiveness by, for example, protecting the youngest infants or providing herd protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10271,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Vaccine Immunology","volume":"24 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1128/CVI.00566-16","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Vaccine Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00566-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

The widespread use of meningococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccines has highlighted the challenge of providing protection against serogroup B disease. Over a period of 4 decades, vaccine development has focused on subcapsular protein antigens, first with outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccines against epidemic outbreaks, and more recently on new multicomponent vaccines designed to offer better cross-protection against the antigenically diverse strains responsible for endemic disease. Because of the low incidence of meningococcal disease, the protective efficacy of these vaccines has not been determined in clinical studies, and their licensure has been based on serological data; however, the serological assays used to predict protective coverage have limitations. As a result, evidence of the effectiveness of these vaccines against different strains and the contribution of specific antigens to protection can only be provided by epidemiological analyses following their implementation in sufficiently large populations. The recent inclusion of the four-component meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) vaccine, Bexsero, in the infant immunization program in the UK has provided preliminary evidence that the vaccine is effective. Ongoing surveillance will provide valuable data on its longer-term impact and antigenic coverage. Further development of protein-based vaccines against meningococcal disease is anticipated to improve antigenic coverage and adjust to changes in circulating strains. At the same time, alternative immunization strategies may be explored to improve overall vaccine effectiveness by, for example, protecting the youngest infants or providing herd protection.

血清B群脑膜炎球菌病预防的最新进展
脑膜炎球菌多糖结合疫苗的广泛使用突出了提供针对血清B群疾病的保护的挑战。在过去的40年里,疫苗的发展主要集中在荚膜下蛋白抗原上,首先是针对流行病暴发的外膜囊泡(OMV)疫苗,最近是针对导致地方病的抗原多样性菌株提供更好交叉保护的新型多组分疫苗。由于脑膜炎球菌病的发病率较低,这些疫苗的保护功效尚未在临床研究中确定,其许可是基于血清学数据;然而,用于预测保护覆盖的血清学分析有局限性。因此,这些疫苗对不同毒株的有效性和特定抗原对保护作用的证据只能通过在足够大的人群中实施后的流行病学分析来提供。最近在英国的婴儿免疫规划中纳入了四组分脑膜炎球菌血清B (4CMenB)疫苗Bexsero,这为该疫苗的有效性提供了初步证据。正在进行的监测将提供有关其长期影响和抗原覆盖的宝贵数据。预计针对脑膜炎球菌病的蛋白疫苗的进一步开发将提高抗原覆盖范围并适应流行菌株的变化。与此同时,可以探索其他免疫战略,例如通过保护最年幼的婴儿或提供群体保护来提高疫苗的总体效力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
2.88
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Cessation. First launched as Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology (CDLI) in 1994, CVI published articles that enhanced the understanding of the immune response in health and disease and after vaccination by showcasing discoveries in clinical, laboratory, and vaccine immunology. CVI was committed to advancing all aspects of vaccine research and immunization, including discovery of new vaccine antigens and vaccine design, development and evaluation of vaccines in animal models and in humans, characterization of immune responses and mechanisms of vaccine action, controlled challenge studies to assess vaccine efficacy, study of vaccine vectors, adjuvants, and immunomodulators, immune correlates of protection, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信