New Care Models revisited.

London journal of primary care Pub Date : 2017-03-08 eCollection Date: 2017-03-01 DOI:10.1080/17571472.2017.1299163
Paul Thomas
{"title":"New Care Models revisited.","authors":"Paul Thomas","doi":"10.1080/17571472.2017.1299163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Issue of LJPC (9.2) is deliberately short, to complement a Virtual Issue on New Care Models, also presented in March 2017. The Virtual Issue highlights 18 previously published LJPC papers that have explored different aspects of integrated care and health promotion at local, community level. These papers will support discussions at the 30 March 2017 London City Health Conference, hosted by RCGP London in collaboration with LJPC. The City Health Conference focuses on New Models of Care – ways to integrate care and health promotion at local, community level. Simply put, general practice cannot achieve on its own everything that general practice needs to achieve. Its traditional values of whole person, community-oriented care and health promotion need to be embedded within whole communities, networks and systems. This means systems to support a grand alliance for health and care – horizontally for inter-disciplinary team-working that builds communities for health, and vertically for generalist/specialist collaboration for good medical care. The question is, how we do this in sustainable and efficient ways? The two papers in Issue 9.2 build from the 18 papers in the Virtual Issue on New Care Models • Lee and Titchener describe the GSTT@home service. This initiative brings specialist care into patients homes to treat relapse of chronic conditions, infections requiring IV therapy, heart failure, urinary tract infections, falls, community acquired pneumonia, diabetes and blood monitoring. It provides a transferable model of complex collaborations for the care of sick people at home. • Kelley-Patterson, Knapton and Hurst describe ways to generate comparative data from large databases to demonstrate the effect of complex collaborations such as hospital at home, to scrutinise and defend variation, and to take ownership of decision-making at a local level. It would be possible to use such data in annual cycles of learning and change to see the combined effect of multiple initiatives for health and care.","PeriodicalId":89823,"journal":{"name":"London journal of primary care","volume":"9 2","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17571472.2017.1299163","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London journal of primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2017.1299163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This Issue of LJPC (9.2) is deliberately short, to complement a Virtual Issue on New Care Models, also presented in March 2017. The Virtual Issue highlights 18 previously published LJPC papers that have explored different aspects of integrated care and health promotion at local, community level. These papers will support discussions at the 30 March 2017 London City Health Conference, hosted by RCGP London in collaboration with LJPC. The City Health Conference focuses on New Models of Care – ways to integrate care and health promotion at local, community level. Simply put, general practice cannot achieve on its own everything that general practice needs to achieve. Its traditional values of whole person, community-oriented care and health promotion need to be embedded within whole communities, networks and systems. This means systems to support a grand alliance for health and care – horizontally for inter-disciplinary team-working that builds communities for health, and vertically for generalist/specialist collaboration for good medical care. The question is, how we do this in sustainable and efficient ways? The two papers in Issue 9.2 build from the 18 papers in the Virtual Issue on New Care Models • Lee and Titchener describe the GSTT@home service. This initiative brings specialist care into patients homes to treat relapse of chronic conditions, infections requiring IV therapy, heart failure, urinary tract infections, falls, community acquired pneumonia, diabetes and blood monitoring. It provides a transferable model of complex collaborations for the care of sick people at home. • Kelley-Patterson, Knapton and Hurst describe ways to generate comparative data from large databases to demonstrate the effect of complex collaborations such as hospital at home, to scrutinise and defend variation, and to take ownership of decision-making at a local level. It would be possible to use such data in annual cycles of learning and change to see the combined effect of multiple initiatives for health and care.
重新审视新的护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书