Preliminary evaluation of a novel bladder-liner for facilitating residual limb fluid volume recovery without doffing.

Q Medicine
Joan E Sanders, Christian B Redd, John C Cagle, Brian J Hafner, David Gardner, Katheryn J Allyn, Daniel S Harrison, Marcia A Ciol
{"title":"Preliminary evaluation of a novel bladder-liner for facilitating residual limb fluid volume recovery without doffing.","authors":"Joan E Sanders,&nbsp;Christian B Redd,&nbsp;John C Cagle,&nbsp;Brian J Hafner,&nbsp;David Gardner,&nbsp;Katheryn J Allyn,&nbsp;Daniel S Harrison,&nbsp;Marcia A Ciol","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2014.12.0316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For people who wear a prosthetic limb, residual-limb fluid volume loss during the day may be problematic and detrimentally affect socket fit. The purpose of this research was to test the capability of a novel liner with adjustable bladders positioned within its wall to mitigate volume loss and facilitate limb fluid volume recovery and retention. Bioimpedance analysis was used to monitor fluid volume changes in the anterior and posterior residual limb of participants with transtibial amputation. Participants underwent six cycles of sitting for 90 s, standing for 90 s, and walking for 5 min with liquid within the bladder-liners. Between the third and fourth cycles, participants sat for 10 min with liquid left within the bladders (Liquid-In) or removed (Liquid-Out). Results showed that participants recovered more fluid volume during the 10 min of sitting with Liquid-Out than Liquid-In (p = 0.09 for anterior and p = 0.04 for posterior). However, those fluid volume recoveries were not well retained in the short term (after the fourth cycle) or the long term (after the sixth cycle). Physiologic differences between sessions, reflected in the rates of fluid volume change at the outset of the session, and excessive stiffness of the bladder-liners may have affected fluid volume retentions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"53 6","pages":"1107-1120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2014.12.0316","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.12.0316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

For people who wear a prosthetic limb, residual-limb fluid volume loss during the day may be problematic and detrimentally affect socket fit. The purpose of this research was to test the capability of a novel liner with adjustable bladders positioned within its wall to mitigate volume loss and facilitate limb fluid volume recovery and retention. Bioimpedance analysis was used to monitor fluid volume changes in the anterior and posterior residual limb of participants with transtibial amputation. Participants underwent six cycles of sitting for 90 s, standing for 90 s, and walking for 5 min with liquid within the bladder-liners. Between the third and fourth cycles, participants sat for 10 min with liquid left within the bladders (Liquid-In) or removed (Liquid-Out). Results showed that participants recovered more fluid volume during the 10 min of sitting with Liquid-Out than Liquid-In (p = 0.09 for anterior and p = 0.04 for posterior). However, those fluid volume recoveries were not well retained in the short term (after the fourth cycle) or the long term (after the sixth cycle). Physiologic differences between sessions, reflected in the rates of fluid volume change at the outset of the session, and excessive stiffness of the bladder-liners may have affected fluid volume retentions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种新型膀胱衬垫的初步评估,以促进残肢液体容量的恢复。
对于佩戴假肢的人来说,白天的残肢液体量损失可能会造成问题,并对关节窝的契合度产生不利影响。本研究的目的是测试一种新型衬垫的能力,这种衬垫的壁上装有可调节的膀胱,以减轻体积损失,促进肢体液体体积的恢复和保留。生物阻抗分析用于监测经胫骨截肢参与者前后残肢的液体容量变化。参与者进行了6个循环:坐90秒,站90秒,步行5分钟,膀胱衬里有液体。在第三和第四个周期之间,参与者静坐10分钟,让液体留在膀胱内(液体进)或取出(液体出)。结果显示,参与者在液-出坐姿的10分钟内比液-入坐姿恢复了更多的液体体积(前置p = 0.09,后置p = 0.04)。然而,在短期内(在第四个周期之后)或长期(在第六个周期之后),这些液体体积的回收并没有得到很好的保留。疗程之间的生理差异(反映在疗程开始时的液体体积变化速率上)和膀胱衬垫过度僵硬可能影响了液体体积潴留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.64
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信