A multifaceted approach to improving the quality of ENT Emergency Clinic referrals.

BMJ quality improvement reports Pub Date : 2017-03-20 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjquality.u206639.w6166
Chloe Swords, Laura Leach, Anand Kasbekar, Piyush Jani
{"title":"A multifaceted approach to improving the quality of ENT Emergency Clinic referrals.","authors":"Chloe Swords,&nbsp;Laura Leach,&nbsp;Anand Kasbekar,&nbsp;Piyush Jani","doi":"10.1136/bmjquality.u206639.w6166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is imperative that primary care referrals are directed to the appropriate secondary care service. Patients presenting to a primary care physician with ENT conditions may require review in an Emergency Clinic. The latter clinics provide patients with rapid access to secondary care, for urgent, yet non-life-threatening conditions. In our department, we noticed that patients with conditions inappropriate to the capabilities of the Clinic were being booked in or reviewed too late; thus causing wasted journeys for the patient. We conducted a Quality Improvement Project to improve the efficiency of the referral process. A prospective evaluation of referrals was collected continuously over a two-month period. Overall, 5 domains were deemed crucial to enable timely and accurate booking of patients to clinic: booking date, urgency, legibility, patient identification and appropriateness. Our proposed standard set for this project was 100% compliance over the 5 domains. Three separate interventions were instigated following the first cycle. The main components of the intervention were the phased development of an electronic referral system and an educational initiative for junior doctors. 20 referral forms were analysed during the initial 3-week period. No referrals met the recommended overall compliance standard of 100% (mean number of domains achieved: 3.38; standard deviation (SD): 0.637). Legibility and patient information were included in 21% and 30% of referrals, respectively. There was a trend of improvement following initiation of interventions. The mean number of domains achieved was 4.27 (SD 0.647; n=13) in the second data collection period, 4.53 (SD 0.514; n=16) in the third, and 4.75 (SD 0.452; n=24) in the fourth. Using linear regression, this change demonstrates a statistically significant improvement (p<0.001). An e-Proforma referral system represents a safe and efficient communication technology. When implementing policy change, it is crucial to acquire managerial and consultant support.</p>","PeriodicalId":91218,"journal":{"name":"BMJ quality improvement reports","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjquality.u206639.w6166","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ quality improvement reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u206639.w6166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

It is imperative that primary care referrals are directed to the appropriate secondary care service. Patients presenting to a primary care physician with ENT conditions may require review in an Emergency Clinic. The latter clinics provide patients with rapid access to secondary care, for urgent, yet non-life-threatening conditions. In our department, we noticed that patients with conditions inappropriate to the capabilities of the Clinic were being booked in or reviewed too late; thus causing wasted journeys for the patient. We conducted a Quality Improvement Project to improve the efficiency of the referral process. A prospective evaluation of referrals was collected continuously over a two-month period. Overall, 5 domains were deemed crucial to enable timely and accurate booking of patients to clinic: booking date, urgency, legibility, patient identification and appropriateness. Our proposed standard set for this project was 100% compliance over the 5 domains. Three separate interventions were instigated following the first cycle. The main components of the intervention were the phased development of an electronic referral system and an educational initiative for junior doctors. 20 referral forms were analysed during the initial 3-week period. No referrals met the recommended overall compliance standard of 100% (mean number of domains achieved: 3.38; standard deviation (SD): 0.637). Legibility and patient information were included in 21% and 30% of referrals, respectively. There was a trend of improvement following initiation of interventions. The mean number of domains achieved was 4.27 (SD 0.647; n=13) in the second data collection period, 4.53 (SD 0.514; n=16) in the third, and 4.75 (SD 0.452; n=24) in the fourth. Using linear regression, this change demonstrates a statistically significant improvement (p<0.001). An e-Proforma referral system represents a safe and efficient communication technology. When implementing policy change, it is crucial to acquire managerial and consultant support.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

提高耳鼻喉科急诊转诊质量的多方面方法。
必须将初级保健转介到适当的二级保健服务。患有耳鼻喉科疾病的初级保健医生可能需要在急诊诊所进行复查。后两家诊所为患者提供紧急但不危及生命的二级护理。在我们的科室,我们注意到那些病情与诊所的能力不相符的病人被预约或复查得太晚;这样就浪费了病人的路程。我们进行了一项质素改善计划,以提高转介程序的效率。在两个月的时间里,不断收集对转诊患者的前瞻性评估。总的来说,5个领域被认为是至关重要的,以实现及时和准确的预约患者到诊所:预约日期,紧迫性,易读性,患者身份和适当性。我们为这个项目提出的标准集是在5个领域100%的遵从性。在第一个周期之后,进行了三次单独的干预。干预措施的主要组成部分是电子转诊系统的分阶段发展和初级医生的教育倡议。在最初的3周期间分析了20份转诊表格。没有推荐达到100%的推荐总体合规标准(达到的平均域名数:3.38;标准差(SD): 0.637)。易读性和患者信息分别包含在21%和30%的转诊中。在采取干预措施后,情况有改善的趋势。获得的平均域数为4.27个(SD 0.647;n=13),为4.53 (SD 0.514;n=16), 4.75 (SD 0.452;N =24)。使用线性回归,这一变化显示了统计学上显著的改善(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信