{"title":"Cat-bite-induced <i>Francisella tularensis</i> infection with a false-positive serological reaction for <i>Bartonella quintana</i>.","authors":"Evelina Petersson, Simon Athlin","doi":"10.1099/jmmcr.0.005071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Tularaemia is caused by infection with <i>Francisella tularensis</i>transmitted via direct contact with an infected hare carcass or indirectly through the bites of vectors, but may be cat-bite-associated as well. Medical history and reliable diagnostic analysis are important in order to differentiate it from other cat-associated infections, e.g. <i>Bartonella</i> spp. <b>Case</b><b>presentation.</b> A healthy 56-year-old man was examined because of a cat-bite-associated ulceroglandular wound on his right thumb. Nineteen days after the cat bite occurred, a serology test was positive for anti-<i>Bartonella quintana</i>, but negative for anti-<i>F. tularensis</i>. Since <i>Bartonella</i> infections are rare in Sweden, another serology test was analysed 2 weeks later with a positive result for anti-<i>F. tularensis</i>. The patient was treated with doxycycline for 14 days and recovered. The patient was re-sampled after 18 months to obtain a convalescent sample. The acute and the convalescent samples were both analysed at a reference centre, with negative results for anti-<i>Bartonella</i> spp. this time. <b>Conclusion.</b> This case is enlightening about the importance of extending the medical history and re-sampling the patient for antibody detection when the clinical suspicion of cat-bite-associated tularaemia is high. The false-positive result for anti-<i>B. quintana</i> antibodies may have been due to technical issues with the assay, cross-reactivity or both.</p>","PeriodicalId":73559,"journal":{"name":"JMM case reports","volume":"4 2","pages":"e005071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361632/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMM case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmmcr.0.005071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Introduction. Tularaemia is caused by infection with Francisella tularensistransmitted via direct contact with an infected hare carcass or indirectly through the bites of vectors, but may be cat-bite-associated as well. Medical history and reliable diagnostic analysis are important in order to differentiate it from other cat-associated infections, e.g. Bartonella spp. Casepresentation. A healthy 56-year-old man was examined because of a cat-bite-associated ulceroglandular wound on his right thumb. Nineteen days after the cat bite occurred, a serology test was positive for anti-Bartonella quintana, but negative for anti-F. tularensis. Since Bartonella infections are rare in Sweden, another serology test was analysed 2 weeks later with a positive result for anti-F. tularensis. The patient was treated with doxycycline for 14 days and recovered. The patient was re-sampled after 18 months to obtain a convalescent sample. The acute and the convalescent samples were both analysed at a reference centre, with negative results for anti-Bartonella spp. this time. Conclusion. This case is enlightening about the importance of extending the medical history and re-sampling the patient for antibody detection when the clinical suspicion of cat-bite-associated tularaemia is high. The false-positive result for anti-B. quintana antibodies may have been due to technical issues with the assay, cross-reactivity or both.