What Is the Economic Cost of Unplanned Pregnancy Following Hysteroscopic Sterilization in the US? A New National Estimate Based on Essure® Procedure Prevalence, Failure Rates and Workforce Productivity.

Q4 Medicine
E Scott Sills, Luca P Fernandez, Christopher A Jones
{"title":"What Is the Economic Cost of Unplanned Pregnancy Following Hysteroscopic Sterilization in the US? A New National Estimate Based on Essure® Procedure Prevalence, Failure Rates and Workforce Productivity.","authors":"E Scott Sills,&nbsp;Luca P Fernandez,&nbsp;Christopher A Jones","doi":"10.12927/whp.2016.24899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although hysteroscopic sterilization (HS) (Essure ®) has been available in the US since 2002, there is disagreement regarding its efficacy, and there has been no study of the economic impact of HS failure. Our investigation examined the economic consequences of contraceptive failure with Essure in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Contraceptive failure rates (CFR) of 5.7%, 7.7% and 9.6% were applied to the US cohort of HS patients (n = 600,000). Direct economic impact of productivity losses resulting from unplanned conceptions after HS was calculated by factoring Essure failure rate, the exposed population, US female labour force participation, unemployment rate, time away from work owing to vaginal delivery or pregnancy termination and weekly wages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 9.6% CFR scenario, US workforce productivity loss from unplanned pregnancy and delivery was estimated at 771,065 days (2,112 years). Productivity loss secondary to conception and subsequent termination of pregnancy after Essure was approximately 23,725 days (65 years). Assuming CFR at 5.7%, livebirth delivery with total time missed from work at 65 days, this was associated with an aggregate economic impact of $49.2M in lost annual wages. Direct economic impact of unplanned pregnancy after Essure irrespective of outcome (terminations and deliveries) was estimated to result in US productivity losses valued at ~$130M.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although not all unplanned pregnancy costs are attributable to failed HS, estimates derived from earlier surveys have not considered this contraceptive method, and the economic consequences of unplanned pregnancy after Essure are not trivial. Quantifying the economic consequences of HS failure would be improved with specific ICD-10 coding for Essure-associated symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":40038,"journal":{"name":"World health & population","volume":"17 1","pages":"31-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World health & population","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/whp.2016.24899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Although hysteroscopic sterilization (HS) (Essure ®) has been available in the US since 2002, there is disagreement regarding its efficacy, and there has been no study of the economic impact of HS failure. Our investigation examined the economic consequences of contraceptive failure with Essure in the US.

Methods: Contraceptive failure rates (CFR) of 5.7%, 7.7% and 9.6% were applied to the US cohort of HS patients (n = 600,000). Direct economic impact of productivity losses resulting from unplanned conceptions after HS was calculated by factoring Essure failure rate, the exposed population, US female labour force participation, unemployment rate, time away from work owing to vaginal delivery or pregnancy termination and weekly wages.

Results: For the 9.6% CFR scenario, US workforce productivity loss from unplanned pregnancy and delivery was estimated at 771,065 days (2,112 years). Productivity loss secondary to conception and subsequent termination of pregnancy after Essure was approximately 23,725 days (65 years). Assuming CFR at 5.7%, livebirth delivery with total time missed from work at 65 days, this was associated with an aggregate economic impact of $49.2M in lost annual wages. Direct economic impact of unplanned pregnancy after Essure irrespective of outcome (terminations and deliveries) was estimated to result in US productivity losses valued at ~$130M.

Conclusion: Although not all unplanned pregnancy costs are attributable to failed HS, estimates derived from earlier surveys have not considered this contraceptive method, and the economic consequences of unplanned pregnancy after Essure are not trivial. Quantifying the economic consequences of HS failure would be improved with specific ICD-10 coding for Essure-associated symptoms.

美国宫腔镜绝育后意外怀孕的经济成本是多少?一项基于Essure®程序流行率,故障率和劳动力生产率的新的国家估计。
目的:虽然宫腔镜绝育(HS) (Essure®)自2002年以来在美国已经可用,但对其疗效存在分歧,并且没有关于HS失败的经济影响的研究。我们的调查检查了在美国使用安舒避孕失败的经济后果。方法:采用避孕失败率(CFR)分别为5.7%、7.7%和9.6%的美国HS患者队列(n = 60万)。通过考虑避孕失败率、暴露人口、美国女性劳动力参与率、失业率、因阴道分娩或终止妊娠而离开工作的时间和周工资,计算出HS后计划外怀孕造成的生产力损失的直接经济影响。结果:在9.6%的CFR情况下,美国因意外怀孕和分娩而导致的劳动力生产力损失估计为771,065天(2,112年)。妊娠后因受孕和终止妊娠而导致的生产力损失约为23,725天(65年)。假设CFR为5.7%,活产分娩总缺勤时间为65天,这将导致4920万美元的年度工资损失。据估计,无论结果如何(终止妊娠和分娩),妊娠后意外怀孕的直接经济影响导致美国生产力损失约1.3亿美元。结论:虽然并不是所有的意外怀孕费用都归因于失败的HS,但从早期的调查中得出的估计并没有考虑到这种避孕方法,并且在安全后意外怀孕的经济后果不是微不足道的。对高血压相关症状进行特定的ICD-10编码,将有助于量化高血压失败的经济后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World health & population
World health & population Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书