The Relationship between Bone Mineral Density and Estrogen Receptor Positivity in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Zeynep Erdoğan İyigün, Kezban Nur Pilancı, Fatmagül Kuşku Çabuk, Serkan İlgün, Çetin Ordu, Tomris Duymaz, Gül Alço, Filiz Çelebi, Dauren Sarsenov, Filiz İzci, Alper Öztürk, Filiz Ağaçayak, Ülkühan İner Köksal, Fatma Aktepe, Yeşim Eralp, Vahit Özmen
{"title":"The Relationship between Bone Mineral Density and Estrogen Receptor Positivity in Patients with Breast Cancer.","authors":"Zeynep Erdoğan İyigün, Kezban Nur Pilancı, Fatmagül Kuşku Çabuk, Serkan İlgün, Çetin Ordu, Tomris Duymaz, Gül Alço, Filiz Çelebi, Dauren Sarsenov, Filiz İzci, Alper Öztürk, Filiz Ağaçayak, Ülkühan İner Köksal, Fatma Aktepe, Yeşim Eralp, Vahit Özmen","doi":"10.5152/tjbh.2016.2961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE The effect of estrogen on bone mineral density (BMD) and breast cancer has been known for a long time. The aim of this study was to compare of the BMD of patients with breast cancer and healthy individuals, and to investigate the degree of correlation of estrogen receptor (ER) with BMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy-one patients with postmenopausal breast cancer and 79 healthy dividuals were included in the study. The patient demographics (age, menopause age, body mass index, number of children, BMD, Z scores, and estrogen status for breast cancer patients) were taken from hospital records. RESULTS No significant difference was detected between the case and control groups in lumbar region Z scores (p=0.074). At the femur neck, the control group Z scores was higher than patient group (p=0.002). BMI was higher in the patients with breast cancer (p=0.001). There was no statistically significant correlation between ER positivity, BMD, and BMI in ER-positive patients (p=0.495, p=0.8, p=0.846, respectively). There was no difference between the Z scores when the patients were divided into two groups as ER positive and negative (p=0.156, p=0.335, respectively). CONCLUSION This study revealed that there is no difference in lumbar region Z scores between patients with breast cancer and heathy controls; however, the Z scores were higher in the femur neck in the control group, and the BMI was lower in the patient group. Tumor ER positivity does not positively affect BMD.","PeriodicalId":91975,"journal":{"name":"The journal of breast health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5351481/pdf/jbh-12-3-119.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjbh.2016.2961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The effect of estrogen on bone mineral density (BMD) and breast cancer has been known for a long time. The aim of this study was to compare of the BMD of patients with breast cancer and healthy individuals, and to investigate the degree of correlation of estrogen receptor (ER) with BMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy-one patients with postmenopausal breast cancer and 79 healthy dividuals were included in the study. The patient demographics (age, menopause age, body mass index, number of children, BMD, Z scores, and estrogen status for breast cancer patients) were taken from hospital records. RESULTS No significant difference was detected between the case and control groups in lumbar region Z scores (p=0.074). At the femur neck, the control group Z scores was higher than patient group (p=0.002). BMI was higher in the patients with breast cancer (p=0.001). There was no statistically significant correlation between ER positivity, BMD, and BMI in ER-positive patients (p=0.495, p=0.8, p=0.846, respectively). There was no difference between the Z scores when the patients were divided into two groups as ER positive and negative (p=0.156, p=0.335, respectively). CONCLUSION This study revealed that there is no difference in lumbar region Z scores between patients with breast cancer and heathy controls; however, the Z scores were higher in the femur neck in the control group, and the BMI was lower in the patient group. Tumor ER positivity does not positively affect BMD.
乳腺癌患者骨密度与雌激素受体阳性的关系。
目的:雌激素对骨密度(BMD)和乳腺癌的影响早已为人所知。本研究的目的是比较乳腺癌患者与健康人群的骨密度,探讨雌激素受体(ER)与骨密度的相关程度。材料与方法:71例绝经后乳腺癌患者和79名健康者纳入研究。患者的人口统计数据(年龄、绝经年龄、体重指数、儿童数量、骨密度、Z评分和乳腺癌患者的雌激素水平)取自医院记录。结果:病例组与对照组腰椎区Z评分差异无统计学意义(p=0.074)。在股骨颈处,对照组Z评分高于患者组(p=0.002)。乳腺癌患者的BMI较高(p=0.001)。ER阳性患者ER阳性与BMD、BMI的相关性无统计学意义(p=0.495, p=0.8, p=0.846)。将患者分为ER阳性和ER阴性两组时,Z评分差异无统计学意义(p=0.156, p=0.335)。结论:本研究显示乳腺癌患者与健康对照者腰椎区Z评分无差异;而对照组股骨颈Z评分较高,患者组BMI较低。肿瘤ER阳性不影响骨密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信