The CECARI Study: Everolimus (Certican®) Initiation and Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal in Maintenance Heart Transplant Recipients with Renal Insufficiency: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY
Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-02-20 DOI:10.1155/2017/6347138
Jan Van Keer, David Derthoo, Olivier Van Caenegem, Michel De Pauw, Eric Nellessen, Nathalie Duerinckx, Walter Droogne, Gábor Vörös, Bart Meyns, Ann Belmans, Stefan Janssens, Johan Van Cleemput, Johan Vanhaecke
{"title":"The CECARI Study: Everolimus (Certican®) Initiation and Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal in Maintenance Heart Transplant Recipients with Renal Insufficiency: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.","authors":"Jan Van Keer,&nbsp;David Derthoo,&nbsp;Olivier Van Caenegem,&nbsp;Michel De Pauw,&nbsp;Eric Nellessen,&nbsp;Nathalie Duerinckx,&nbsp;Walter Droogne,&nbsp;Gábor Vörös,&nbsp;Bart Meyns,&nbsp;Ann Belmans,&nbsp;Stefan Janssens,&nbsp;Johan Van Cleemput,&nbsp;Johan Vanhaecke","doi":"10.1155/2017/6347138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this 3-year, open-label, multicenter study, 57 maintenance heart transplant recipients (>1 year after transplant) with renal insufficiency (eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) were randomized to start everolimus with CNI withdrawal (<i>N</i> = 29) or continue their current CNI-based immunosuppression (<i>N</i> = 28). The primary endpoint, change in measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) from baseline to year 3, did not differ significantly between both groups (+7.0 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, <i>p</i> = 0.18). In the on-treatment analysis, the difference did reach statistical significance (+9.4 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, <i>p</i> = 0.047). The composite safety endpoint of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or treated acute rejection was not different between groups. Nonfatal adverse events occurred in 96.6% of patients in the everolimus group and 57.1% in the CNI group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Ten patients (34.5%) in the everolimus group discontinued the study drug during follow-up due to adverse events. The poor adherence to the everolimus therapy might have masked a potential benefit of CNI withdrawal on renal function.</p>","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/6347138","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6347138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In this 3-year, open-label, multicenter study, 57 maintenance heart transplant recipients (>1 year after transplant) with renal insufficiency (eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2) were randomized to start everolimus with CNI withdrawal (N = 29) or continue their current CNI-based immunosuppression (N = 28). The primary endpoint, change in measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) from baseline to year 3, did not differ significantly between both groups (+7.0 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, p = 0.18). In the on-treatment analysis, the difference did reach statistical significance (+9.4 mL/min in the everolimus group versus +1.9 mL/min in the CNI group, p = 0.047). The composite safety endpoint of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or treated acute rejection was not different between groups. Nonfatal adverse events occurred in 96.6% of patients in the everolimus group and 57.1% in the CNI group (p < 0.001). Ten patients (34.5%) in the everolimus group discontinued the study drug during follow-up due to adverse events. The poor adherence to the everolimus therapy might have masked a potential benefit of CNI withdrawal on renal function.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

CECARI研究:依维莫司(Certican®)起始和钙调磷酸酶抑制剂停药对肾功能不全的维护性心脏移植受者:一项多中心、随机试验。
在这项为期3年、开放标签、多中心的研究中,57名肾功能不全(eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2)的维护者心脏移植受者(移植后>1年)被随机分组,开始使用依维莫司并停用CNI (N = 29)或继续目前基于CNI的免疫抑制(N = 28)。主要终点肾小球滤过率(mGFR)从基线到第3年的变化在两组之间没有显著差异(依维莫司组为+7.0 mL/min,而CNI组为+1.9 mL/min, p = 0.18)。在治疗分析中,差异确实具有统计学意义(依维莫司组为+9.4 mL/min, CNI组为+1.9 mL/min, p = 0.047)。全因死亡率、主要不良心血管事件或治疗急性排斥反应的复合安全性终点在两组之间没有差异。依维莫司组非致命性不良事件发生率为96.6%,CNI组为57.1% (p < 0.001)。依维莫司组有10例(34.5%)患者在随访期间因不良事件停药。依维莫司治疗依从性差可能掩盖了CNI停药对肾功能的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信