Large-scale Health Information Database and Privacy Protection.

Ryuichi Yamamoto
{"title":"Large-scale Health Information Database and Privacy Protection.","authors":"Ryuichi Yamamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Japan was once progressive in the digitalization of healthcare fields but unfortunately has fallen behind in terms of the secondary use of data for public interest. There has recently been a trend to establish large-scale health databases in the nation, and a conflict between data use for public interest and privacy protection has surfaced as this trend has progressed. Databases for health insurance claims or for specific health checkups and guidance services were created according to the law that aims to ensure healthcare for the elderly; however, there is no mention in the act about using these databases for public interest in general. Thus, an initiative for such use must proceed carefully and attentively. The PMDA projects that collect a large amount of medical record information from large hospitals and the health database development project that the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) is working on will soon begin to operate according to a general consensus; however, the validity of this consensus can be questioned if issues of anonymity arise. The likelihood that researchers conducting a study for public interest would intentionally invade the privacy of their subjects is slim. However, patients could develop a sense of distrust about their data being used since legal requirements are ambiguous. Nevertheless, without using patients' medical records for public interest, progress in medicine will grind to a halt. Proper legislation that is clear for both researchers and patients will therefore be highly desirable. A revision of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information is currently in progress. In reality, however, privacy is not something that laws alone can protect; it will also require guidelines and self-discipline. We now live in an information capitalization age. I will introduce the trends in legal reform regarding healthcare information and discuss some basics to help people properly face the issue of health big data and privacy protection with a sense of ownership.</p>","PeriodicalId":90568,"journal":{"name":"Japan Medical Association journal : JMAJ","volume":"59 2-3","pages":"91-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5333617/pdf/jmaj-59-0091.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Medical Association journal : JMAJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Japan was once progressive in the digitalization of healthcare fields but unfortunately has fallen behind in terms of the secondary use of data for public interest. There has recently been a trend to establish large-scale health databases in the nation, and a conflict between data use for public interest and privacy protection has surfaced as this trend has progressed. Databases for health insurance claims or for specific health checkups and guidance services were created according to the law that aims to ensure healthcare for the elderly; however, there is no mention in the act about using these databases for public interest in general. Thus, an initiative for such use must proceed carefully and attentively. The PMDA projects that collect a large amount of medical record information from large hospitals and the health database development project that the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) is working on will soon begin to operate according to a general consensus; however, the validity of this consensus can be questioned if issues of anonymity arise. The likelihood that researchers conducting a study for public interest would intentionally invade the privacy of their subjects is slim. However, patients could develop a sense of distrust about their data being used since legal requirements are ambiguous. Nevertheless, without using patients' medical records for public interest, progress in medicine will grind to a halt. Proper legislation that is clear for both researchers and patients will therefore be highly desirable. A revision of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information is currently in progress. In reality, however, privacy is not something that laws alone can protect; it will also require guidelines and self-discipline. We now live in an information capitalization age. I will introduce the trends in legal reform regarding healthcare information and discuss some basics to help people properly face the issue of health big data and privacy protection with a sense of ownership.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大型健康信息数据库与隐私保护。
日本曾经在医疗保健领域的数字化方面取得了进步,但不幸的是,在为公共利益而二次使用数据方面落后了。近年来,国内出现了建立大规模健康数据库的趋势,随着这一趋势的发展,数据的公共利益使用与隐私保护之间的冲突日益显现。根据旨在确保老年人保健的法律,建立了健康保险索赔或具体健康检查和指导服务数据库;然而,法案中并没有提到将这些数据库用于公共利益。因此,这种使用的倡议必须谨慎而认真地进行。从大型医院收集大量医疗记录信息的PMDA项目和卫生、劳动和福利部正在进行的保健数据库开发项目将很快按照普遍共识开始运作;然而,如果出现匿名问题,这种共识的有效性就会受到质疑。为了公众利益而进行研究的研究人员故意侵犯研究对象隐私的可能性很小。然而,由于法律要求含糊不清,患者可能会对自己的数据被使用产生不信任。然而,如果不利用病人的医疗记录为公共利益服务,医学的进步将会停滞不前。因此,对研究人员和患者都明确的适当立法将是非常可取的。目前正在修改《个人信息保护法》。然而,在现实中,隐私并不是仅靠法律就能保护的;它还需要指导方针和自律。我们现在生活在一个信息资本化的时代。我将介绍医疗信息法律改革的趋势,并讨论一些基础知识,以帮助人们正确面对健康大数据和隐私保护的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书