[Selection of Laboratory Procedures to Detect Toxigenic by the 2-Step Method].

Yoko Tanino, Mai Kodama, Hiroomi Daicho, Yoshito Miyauchi, Towa Yasumoto, Yukiji Yamada, Noriko Kyotani, Satoko Kurahashi, Masaji Ushiyama, Takeshi Kimura, Toshiaki Komori, Yumiko Fujitomo, Masaki Nakanishi, Naohisa Fujita
{"title":"[Selection of Laboratory Procedures to Detect Toxigenic by the 2-Step Method].","authors":"Yoko Tanino,&nbsp;Mai Kodama,&nbsp;Hiroomi Daicho,&nbsp;Yoshito Miyauchi,&nbsp;Towa Yasumoto,&nbsp;Yukiji Yamada,&nbsp;Noriko Kyotani,&nbsp;Satoko Kurahashi,&nbsp;Masaji Ushiyama,&nbsp;Takeshi Kimura,&nbsp;Toshiaki Komori,&nbsp;Yumiko Fujitomo,&nbsp;Masaki Nakanishi,&nbsp;Naohisa Fujita","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2-step method is an algorithm to detect toxigenic <i>Clostridium difficile</i>. We herein compared the sensitivities and specificities of an enzyme immunoassay (toxin A/B-EIA), toxigenic culture (TC-EIA), Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification assay (LAMP), and Xpert <i>C. difficile</i> (Xpert) with the detection of the toxin B gene by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The results obtained showed that the sensitivities and specificities of toxin A/B-EIA, Xpert, TC-EIA, and LAMP were 30 and 100%, 87.2 and 100%, 97.5 and 89.7%, and 95 and 100%, respectively. We also evaluated the turnaround time (TAT) and cost of toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> detection. Our hospital TAT for toxin A/B-EIA and TC-EIA are 37 min and 5 days, respectively. We estimated the TAT of Xpert, LAMP, and PCR to be 105 min, 5 days, and 6 days, respectively. On the other hand, the cost to detect toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> increased in the order of TC-EIA, LAMP, Xpert, and PCR. We have never experienced outbreak of <i>Clostridium difficile</i> infection (CDI) in our hospital, and there is less the number of CDI than other place. So we selected TC-EIA that is good sensitivity and low cost per specimen. Hereafter it'll be necessary to solve a problem it takes time, because we have to respond to outbreak of CDI quickly if it happens.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 1","pages":"9-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2-step method is an algorithm to detect toxigenic Clostridium difficile. We herein compared the sensitivities and specificities of an enzyme immunoassay (toxin A/B-EIA), toxigenic culture (TC-EIA), Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification assay (LAMP), and Xpert C. difficile (Xpert) with the detection of the toxin B gene by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The results obtained showed that the sensitivities and specificities of toxin A/B-EIA, Xpert, TC-EIA, and LAMP were 30 and 100%, 87.2 and 100%, 97.5 and 89.7%, and 95 and 100%, respectively. We also evaluated the turnaround time (TAT) and cost of toxigenic C. difficile detection. Our hospital TAT for toxin A/B-EIA and TC-EIA are 37 min and 5 days, respectively. We estimated the TAT of Xpert, LAMP, and PCR to be 105 min, 5 days, and 6 days, respectively. On the other hand, the cost to detect toxigenic C. difficile increased in the order of TC-EIA, LAMP, Xpert, and PCR. We have never experienced outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in our hospital, and there is less the number of CDI than other place. So we selected TC-EIA that is good sensitivity and low cost per specimen. Hereafter it'll be necessary to solve a problem it takes time, because we have to respond to outbreak of CDI quickly if it happens.

[两步法产毒素检测实验室程序的选择]。
两步法是一种检测产毒艰难梭菌的算法。在此,我们比较了酶免疫测定法(毒素A/B- eia)、产毒培养法(TC-EIA)、环介导等温扩增法(LAMP)和Xpert艰难梭菌(Xpert)与聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测毒素B基因的敏感性和特异性。结果表明,毒素A/B-EIA、Xpert、TC-EIA和LAMP的敏感性和特异性分别为30和100%、87.2和100%、97.5和89.7%、95和100%。我们还评估了产毒艰难梭菌检测的周转时间(TAT)和成本。毒素A/B-EIA和TC-EIA在我院TAT分别为37 min和5 d。我们估计Xpert, LAMP和PCR的TAT分别为105 min, 5天和6天。另一方面,产毒艰难梭菌的检测成本依次为TC-EIA、LAMP、Xpert、PCR。我院从未发生过艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的暴发,CDI的数量也少于其他地方。因此,我们选择了灵敏度高、样品成本低的TC-EIA。以后有必要解决一个问题,这需要时间,因为我们必须迅速应对爆发的CDI,如果它发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信