Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies.

Disaster and military medicine Pub Date : 2015-12-01 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40696-015-0010-3
Itay Ketko, Amit Druyan, Ran Yanovich, Yoram Epstein, Yuval Heled
{"title":"Return to duty/play after exertional heat injury: do we have all the answers? A lesson from two case studies.","authors":"Itay Ketko,&nbsp;Amit Druyan,&nbsp;Ran Yanovich,&nbsp;Yoram Epstein,&nbsp;Yuval Heled","doi":"10.1186/s40696-015-0010-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The common practice in the Israel defense Forces is that exertional heat related injury patients undergo a heat tolerance test 6-8 weeks post event as part of the \"return to duty\" process. In the case of a positive heat tolerance test the individual is classified as heat intolerant, in some cases however, the thermoregulatory recovery may be longer (several months), and therefore a second heat tolerance test is scheduled 6-8 weeks later. The presented case reports emphasize the possibility of different recovery periods of the thermoregulatory center and the distinction between congenital and acquired physiological heat intolerance.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>Two young healthy males (A and B) were diagnosed with exertional heat related injury during a pre-recruitment sorting process. Both underwent a heat tolerance test, and were found heat intolerant. During the next months they repeated the test several times. Patient A was finally diagnosed as heat tolerant and patient B was diagnosed as heat intolerant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Susceptibility to heat is a significant determinant for active young people such as athletes and soldiers. Both cases emphasize the importance of the heat tolerance test (and repeated test when needed) as a criteria for an exertional heat related injury patient to return to duty/play and to perform intense physical activities. These cases also emphasize the effectiveness and sensitivity of the test in identifying a temporary and a permanent state of heat intolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":91863,"journal":{"name":"Disaster and military medicine","volume":"1 ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40696-015-0010-3","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster and military medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40696-015-0010-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The common practice in the Israel defense Forces is that exertional heat related injury patients undergo a heat tolerance test 6-8 weeks post event as part of the "return to duty" process. In the case of a positive heat tolerance test the individual is classified as heat intolerant, in some cases however, the thermoregulatory recovery may be longer (several months), and therefore a second heat tolerance test is scheduled 6-8 weeks later. The presented case reports emphasize the possibility of different recovery periods of the thermoregulatory center and the distinction between congenital and acquired physiological heat intolerance.

Case description: Two young healthy males (A and B) were diagnosed with exertional heat related injury during a pre-recruitment sorting process. Both underwent a heat tolerance test, and were found heat intolerant. During the next months they repeated the test several times. Patient A was finally diagnosed as heat tolerant and patient B was diagnosed as heat intolerant.

Conclusion: Susceptibility to heat is a significant determinant for active young people such as athletes and soldiers. Both cases emphasize the importance of the heat tolerance test (and repeated test when needed) as a criteria for an exertional heat related injury patient to return to duty/play and to perform intense physical activities. These cases also emphasize the effectiveness and sensitivity of the test in identifying a temporary and a permanent state of heat intolerance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

劳累性热伤后恢复工作/比赛:我们有所有的答案吗?来自两个案例研究的教训。
背景:以色列国防军的常见做法是,劳累性热相关损伤患者在事件发生后6-8周接受热耐受性测试,作为“重返岗位”过程的一部分。在耐热性测试阳性的情况下,个体被归类为耐热性不佳,然而,在某些情况下,热调节恢复可能更长(几个月),因此第二次耐热性测试被安排在6-8周后。所提出的病例报告强调了热调节中心不同恢复期的可能性,以及先天性和获得性生理性热不耐受之间的区别。病例描述:两名年轻健康男性(A和B)在招募前分类过程中被诊断为运动性热相关损伤。两者都进行了耐热性试验,发现热不耐。在接下来的几个月里,他们重复了几次测试。患者A最终被诊断为耐热性,患者B被诊断为耐热性。结论:热易感性是运动员和军人等活跃青年的重要决定因素。这两种情况都强调了热耐受性测试的重要性(必要时进行重复测试),作为劳累性热相关损伤患者重返工作/玩耍和进行高强度体育活动的标准。这些案例还强调了测试在识别暂时和永久耐热状态方面的有效性和敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信