The search for the best infantry boot.

Disaster and military medicine Pub Date : 2016-10-10 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40696-016-0024-5
Charles Milgrom, Alex Sorkin, Arnon Gam, Jonathan Singer, Itamar Nir, Boris Kogan, Aharon S Finestone
{"title":"The search for the best infantry boot.","authors":"Charles Milgrom,&nbsp;Alex Sorkin,&nbsp;Arnon Gam,&nbsp;Jonathan Singer,&nbsp;Itamar Nir,&nbsp;Boris Kogan,&nbsp;Aharon S Finestone","doi":"10.1186/s40696-016-0024-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combat role of the twenty-first century infantry soldier has changed and accordingly their boots should evolve to meet these new needs and maximize soldier performance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate injuries and durability of the hot weather infantry boots (HWIB) in elite infantry training and assess the initial performance of newly designed Israeli infantry boots (NDIB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Phase 1, the durability of the HWIB during elite infantry training was evaluated at weeks 10, 19 and 64 in a cohort of 67 recruits. At each exam recruits removed their boots which were assessed for wear and integrity and photographed. The number of times recruits changed their boots was recorded. In Phase 2, foot injuries were assessed in a cohort of 73 elite infantry recruits wearing HWIB. In Phase 3, 65 infantry recruits were issued the NDIB. Recruits feet were measured for width and shoe size using the Brannock device and then followed for problems associated with their boots. Foot lesions were document by photographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase 1: The mean longevity of HWIB in training was 5.2 ± 0.2 (SE) months, (95 % CI 4.83-5.61). Phase 2: 38 % of the elite infantry recruits wearing HWIB had at least one complaint and 31 (42 %) were found to have boot related injuries in a total of 56 injured areas. Phase 3: The mean predicted boot size (42.8 ± 1.7) based on Brannock measurements, was less than the size of the NDIB actually worn, 43.1 ± 1.6. Only 34.8 % of the feet were width D (the standard shoe width). At 9 day follow up, 55 of the 65 recruits who wore NDIB reported at least one problem with them (85 %, p < 0.0001, compared to HWIB). By 3 weeks, all but five recruits had returned to wearing the HWIB. Of the recruits wearing NDIB, 47 (72 %) were found to have had at least one boot related injury with a total number of 180 injured foot areas (p = 0.0004, compared to HWIB).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HWIB was well tolerated by the elite infantry recruits and associated with significantly less foot injuries than the NDIB. The longevity of the HWIB in demanding elite infantry training was five months. <i>Trial registration</i>: NCT02810002 retrospectively registered June 22, 2016.</p>","PeriodicalId":91863,"journal":{"name":"Disaster and military medicine","volume":"2 ","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40696-016-0024-5","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster and military medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40696-016-0024-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The combat role of the twenty-first century infantry soldier has changed and accordingly their boots should evolve to meet these new needs and maximize soldier performance.

Objective: To evaluate injuries and durability of the hot weather infantry boots (HWIB) in elite infantry training and assess the initial performance of newly designed Israeli infantry boots (NDIB).

Methods: In Phase 1, the durability of the HWIB during elite infantry training was evaluated at weeks 10, 19 and 64 in a cohort of 67 recruits. At each exam recruits removed their boots which were assessed for wear and integrity and photographed. The number of times recruits changed their boots was recorded. In Phase 2, foot injuries were assessed in a cohort of 73 elite infantry recruits wearing HWIB. In Phase 3, 65 infantry recruits were issued the NDIB. Recruits feet were measured for width and shoe size using the Brannock device and then followed for problems associated with their boots. Foot lesions were document by photographs.

Results: Phase 1: The mean longevity of HWIB in training was 5.2 ± 0.2 (SE) months, (95 % CI 4.83-5.61). Phase 2: 38 % of the elite infantry recruits wearing HWIB had at least one complaint and 31 (42 %) were found to have boot related injuries in a total of 56 injured areas. Phase 3: The mean predicted boot size (42.8 ± 1.7) based on Brannock measurements, was less than the size of the NDIB actually worn, 43.1 ± 1.6. Only 34.8 % of the feet were width D (the standard shoe width). At 9 day follow up, 55 of the 65 recruits who wore NDIB reported at least one problem with them (85 %, p < 0.0001, compared to HWIB). By 3 weeks, all but five recruits had returned to wearing the HWIB. Of the recruits wearing NDIB, 47 (72 %) were found to have had at least one boot related injury with a total number of 180 injured foot areas (p = 0.0004, compared to HWIB).

Conclusions: The HWIB was well tolerated by the elite infantry recruits and associated with significantly less foot injuries than the NDIB. The longevity of the HWIB in demanding elite infantry training was five months. Trial registration: NCT02810002 retrospectively registered June 22, 2016.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

寻找最好的步兵靴。
背景:21世纪步兵的战斗角色已经发生了变化,相应地,他们的靴子也应该进化,以满足这些新的需求,并最大限度地提高士兵的性能。目的:评价高温步兵靴(HWIB)在精锐步兵训练中的损伤和耐久性,评估新设计的以色列步兵靴(NDIB)的初始性能。方法:在第一阶段,在67名新兵的队列中,在第10周、第19周和第64周评估精锐步兵训练期间HWIB的耐久性。在每次考试中,新兵脱下他们的靴子,评估其磨损和完整性,并拍照。新兵换靴子的次数被记录下来。在第二阶段,对73名穿着HWIB的精锐步兵新兵的足部损伤进行了评估。在第三阶段,65名步兵新兵获得了NDIB。用布兰诺克装置测量新兵的脚宽和鞋码,然后跟踪调查与他们的靴子有关的问题。用照片记录足部病变。结果:第一阶段:训练中HWIB的平均寿命为5.2±0.2 (SE)个月,(95% CI 4.83-5.61)。第二阶段:38%穿着HWIB的精锐步兵新兵至少有一次抱怨,31人(42%)在56个受伤区域被发现有与靴子相关的伤害。阶段3:基于Brannock测量的平均预测靴码(42.8±1.7)小于实际穿的NDIB尺寸(43.1±1.6)。只有34.8%的脚宽度是D(标准鞋宽)。在9天的随访中,65名穿着NDIB的新兵中有55人报告了他们至少有一个问题(85%,p)。结论:精锐步兵新兵对HWIB的耐受性良好,与NDIB相比,HWIB的足部损伤明显减少。HWIB在高要求的精锐步兵训练中的寿命为5个月。试验注册:NCT02810002回顾性注册于2016年6月22日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信