Are medical educators in general practice untapped potential to increase training capacity in sexual and reproductive healthcare? Results of a survey in London, UK.

London journal of primary care Pub Date : 2016-08-01 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1080/17571472.2016.1209875
Richard Ma, Radhika Shah
{"title":"Are medical educators in general practice untapped potential to increase training capacity in sexual and reproductive healthcare? Results of a survey in London, UK.","authors":"Richard Ma,&nbsp;Radhika Shah","doi":"10.1080/17571472.2016.1209875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long waiting times for training in sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRH) including long acting reversible contraception (LARC) might lead to attrition from training programmes, leading to reduced capacity for sexual health services, and reduced access to such contraception for women.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>General practice in London, UK.</p><p><strong>Question: </strong>Can medical educators in general practice be used as untapped potential to train other health care professionals in sexual and reproductive healthcare?</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted an online survey to find out the qualifications, skills and willingness of established educators in primary care in London to train other clinicians in sexual and reproductive healthcare, including LARC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 124 responses from medical educators (10.1% response rate from general practitioner (GP) trainers and 59.0% of clinical supervisors for Foundation Year doctors). 86 (69.9%) had diploma of the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (DFSRH) qualification and further 18 (14.6%) were interested in obtaining this qualification. Eleven respondents were trained to fit intrauterine contraception only, three for contraceptive implants only and 37 were trained to fit both. 50 (40.3%) of 124 respondents were willing get involved in DFSRH training; 74% of these were willing to teach on any component of DFSRH including LARC.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is a shortage of training places and long waiting list for clinicians who wish to train in SRH. This survey suggests there is a pool of GP educators with skills and experience in SRH and are willing to train others. This can potentially increase the training capacity and improve overall access to good contraception and LARC for women.</p>","PeriodicalId":89823,"journal":{"name":"London journal of primary care","volume":"8 5","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17571472.2016.1209875","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London journal of primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2016.1209875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Long waiting times for training in sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRH) including long acting reversible contraception (LARC) might lead to attrition from training programmes, leading to reduced capacity for sexual health services, and reduced access to such contraception for women.

Setting: General practice in London, UK.

Question: Can medical educators in general practice be used as untapped potential to train other health care professionals in sexual and reproductive healthcare?

Method: We conducted an online survey to find out the qualifications, skills and willingness of established educators in primary care in London to train other clinicians in sexual and reproductive healthcare, including LARC.

Results: We received 124 responses from medical educators (10.1% response rate from general practitioner (GP) trainers and 59.0% of clinical supervisors for Foundation Year doctors). 86 (69.9%) had diploma of the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (DFSRH) qualification and further 18 (14.6%) were interested in obtaining this qualification. Eleven respondents were trained to fit intrauterine contraception only, three for contraceptive implants only and 37 were trained to fit both. 50 (40.3%) of 124 respondents were willing get involved in DFSRH training; 74% of these were willing to teach on any component of DFSRH including LARC.

Discussion: There is a shortage of training places and long waiting list for clinicians who wish to train in SRH. This survey suggests there is a pool of GP educators with skills and experience in SRH and are willing to train others. This can potentially increase the training capacity and improve overall access to good contraception and LARC for women.

全科医学教育工作者在提高性保健和生殖保健培训能力方面是否有未开发的潜力?英国伦敦的一项调查结果。
背景:性保健和生殖保健(SRH)培训,包括长效可逆避孕(LARC)培训的等待时间过长,可能导致培训方案的损耗,导致性健康服务能力下降,妇女获得此类避孕措施的机会减少。背景:英国伦敦全科医生。问题:能否利用全科医学教育工作者这一尚未开发的潜力来培训其他性健康和生殖健康方面的保健专业人员?方法:我们进行了一项在线调查,以了解伦敦初级保健教育工作者在性和生殖保健方面培训其他临床医生的资格、技能和意愿,包括LARC。结果:我们收到124份来自医学教育工作者的反馈(10.1%来自全科医生(GP)培训师,59.0%来自预科医生的临床督导)。86人(69.9%)拥有性健康和生殖保健学院(DFSRH)资格证书,另有18人(14.6%)有兴趣获得这一资格。11名受访者接受了只适合宫内避孕的培训,3名接受了只适合避孕植入物的培训,37名接受了两者都适合的培训。124名被调查者中有50人(40.3%)表示愿意参与DFSRH培训;其中74%的人愿意讲授DFSRH的任何组成部分,包括LARC。讨论:培训名额短缺,希望参加SRH培训的临床医生的等待名单很长。这项调查表明,有一大批全科医生教育工作者在性健康与健康方面拥有技能和经验,并且愿意培训其他人。这可能会增加培训能力,并改善妇女获得良好避孕和LARC的总体机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书