Study of the removal difference in indoor particulate matter and volatile organic compounds through the application of plants.

Q3 Medicine
Environmental Health and Toxicology Pub Date : 2017-02-22 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.5620/eht.e2017006
Seung-Han Hong, Jiyeon Hong, Jihyeon Yu, Youngwook Lim
{"title":"Study of the removal difference in indoor particulate matter and volatile organic compounds through the application of plants.","authors":"Seung-Han Hong, Jiyeon Hong, Jihyeon Yu, Youngwook Lim","doi":"10.5620/eht.e2017006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to evaluate the ability of plants to purify indoor air by observing the effective reduction rate among pollutant types of particulate matter (PM) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). PM and four types of VOCs were measured in a new building that is less than three years old and under three different conditions: before applying the plant, after applying the plant, and a room without a plant. The removal rate of each pollutant type due to the plant was also compared and analyzed. In the case of indoor PM, the removal effect was negligible because of outdoor influence. However, 9% of benzene, 75% of ethylbenzene, 72% of xylene, 75% of styrene, 50% of formaldehyde, 36% of acetaldehyde, 35% of acrolein with acetone, and 85% of toluene were reduced. The purification of indoor air by natural ventilation is meaningless because the ambient PM concentration has recently been high. However, contamination by gaseous materials such as VOCs can effectively be removed through the application of plants.</p>","PeriodicalId":11853,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health and Toxicology","volume":"32 ","pages":"e2017006"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5620/eht.e2017006","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5620/eht.e2017006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the ability of plants to purify indoor air by observing the effective reduction rate among pollutant types of particulate matter (PM) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). PM and four types of VOCs were measured in a new building that is less than three years old and under three different conditions: before applying the plant, after applying the plant, and a room without a plant. The removal rate of each pollutant type due to the plant was also compared and analyzed. In the case of indoor PM, the removal effect was negligible because of outdoor influence. However, 9% of benzene, 75% of ethylbenzene, 72% of xylene, 75% of styrene, 50% of formaldehyde, 36% of acetaldehyde, 35% of acrolein with acetone, and 85% of toluene were reduced. The purification of indoor air by natural ventilation is meaningless because the ambient PM concentration has recently been high. However, contamination by gaseous materials such as VOCs can effectively be removed through the application of plants.

应用植物对室内颗粒物和挥发性有机物去除差异的研究。
本研究通过观察植物对颗粒物(PM)和挥发性有机物(VOCs)污染物类型的有效降低率,评价植物净化室内空气的能力。PM和四种挥发性有机化合物是在一栋建成不到三年的新建筑中,在三种不同的条件下测量的:安装植物前,安装植物后,和没有植物的房间。并对该装置对各类污染物的去除率进行了比较分析。对于室内PM,由于室外的影响,去除效果可以忽略不计。然而,9%的苯、75%的乙苯、72%的二甲苯、75%的苯乙烯、50%的甲醛、36%的乙醛、35%的丙烯醛和85%的甲苯被丙酮还原。由于近来环境颗粒物浓度偏高,自然通风净化室内空气已无意义。然而,通过植物的应用可以有效地去除挥发性有机化合物等气态物质的污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health and Toxicology
Environmental Health and Toxicology Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信