Epidemic activity after natural disasters without high mortality in developing settings.

Disaster health Pub Date : 2013-04-01 DOI:10.4161/dish.27283
Manuel J Loayza-Alarico, Andres G Lescano, Luis A Suarez-Ognio, Gladys M Ramirez-Prada, David L Blazes
{"title":"Epidemic activity after natural disasters without high mortality in developing settings.","authors":"Manuel J Loayza-Alarico,&nbsp;Andres G Lescano,&nbsp;Luis A Suarez-Ognio,&nbsp;Gladys M Ramirez-Prada,&nbsp;David L Blazes","doi":"10.4161/dish.27283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Natural disasters with minimal human mortality rarely capture headlines but occur frequently and result in significant morbidity and economic loss. We compared the epidemic activity observed after a flood, an earthquake, and volcanic activity in Peru. Following post-disaster guidelines, healthcare facilities and evacuation centers surveyed 10-12 significant health conditions for ~45 days and compared disease frequency with Poisson regression. The disasters affected 20,709 individuals and 15% were placed in evacuation centers. Seven deaths and 6,056 health conditions were reported (mean: 0.29 per person). Health facilities reported fewer events than evacuation centers (0.06-0.24 vs. 0.65-2.02, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and disease notification increased 1.6 times after the disasters (95% CI: 1.5-1.6). Acute respiratory infections were the most frequent event (41-57%) and psychological distress was second/third (7.6% to 14.3%). Morbidity increased after disasters without substantial casualties, particularly at evacuation centers, with frequent respiratory infections and psychological distress. Post-disaster surveillance is valuable even after low-mortality events.</p>","PeriodicalId":90817,"journal":{"name":"Disaster health","volume":"1 2","pages":"102-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4161/dish.27283","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/dish.27283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Natural disasters with minimal human mortality rarely capture headlines but occur frequently and result in significant morbidity and economic loss. We compared the epidemic activity observed after a flood, an earthquake, and volcanic activity in Peru. Following post-disaster guidelines, healthcare facilities and evacuation centers surveyed 10-12 significant health conditions for ~45 days and compared disease frequency with Poisson regression. The disasters affected 20,709 individuals and 15% were placed in evacuation centers. Seven deaths and 6,056 health conditions were reported (mean: 0.29 per person). Health facilities reported fewer events than evacuation centers (0.06-0.24 vs. 0.65-2.02, P < 0.001) and disease notification increased 1.6 times after the disasters (95% CI: 1.5-1.6). Acute respiratory infections were the most frequent event (41-57%) and psychological distress was second/third (7.6% to 14.3%). Morbidity increased after disasters without substantial casualties, particularly at evacuation centers, with frequent respiratory infections and psychological distress. Post-disaster surveillance is valuable even after low-mortality events.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

发展中国家自然灾害后无高死亡率的流行病活动。
人类死亡率最低的自然灾害很少成为头条新闻,但经常发生,造成重大发病率和经济损失。我们比较了秘鲁在洪水、地震和火山活动后观察到的流行病活动。根据灾后指导方针,卫生保健机构和疏散中心调查了10-12个重要的健康状况,为期约45天,并将疾病频率与泊松回归进行了比较。灾难影响了20,709人,其中15%的人被安置在疏散中心。报告了7例死亡和6 056例健康状况(平均每人0.29例)。卫生机构报告的事件比疏散中心少(0.06-0.24比0.65-2.02,P < 0.001),灾害发生后疾病通报增加了1.6倍(95% CI: 1.5-1.6)。急性呼吸道感染是最常见的事件(41 ~ 57%),其次是心理困扰(7.6% ~ 14.3%)。灾后发病率上升,但没有重大伤亡,特别是在疏散中心,经常出现呼吸道感染和心理困扰。即使在低死亡率事件发生后,灾后监测也是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信