Elective Bowel Surgery with or without Prophylactic Nasogastric Decompression: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.

H G Vinay, Mohammed Raza, G Siddesh
{"title":"Elective Bowel Surgery with or without Prophylactic Nasogastric Decompression: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.","authors":"H G Vinay,&nbsp;Mohammed Raza,&nbsp;G Siddesh","doi":"10.4103/2006-8808.185654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Routinely postoperative nasogastric decompression was done until the nasogastric drainage is minimal, reoccurrence of bowel sounds and passing flatus. But prolonged nasogastric intubation is associated with complications like basal atelectasis due to poor cough reflux, loss of electrolytes and increased patient morbidity.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To study the need for routine use of nasogastric tube post operatively in bowel surgeries with reference to (1) Return of bowel movements (2) Compare the incidence of complications (3) Duration of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>100 patients who underwent elective bowel surgery were randomized into two groups: Study group (50): Nasogastric tube was removed immediately after operation or in the recovery room. Control group (50): Underwent nasogastric tube removal postoperatively after the patient passed flatus and audible bowel sounds on auscultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Incidence of complications were less in the study group i.e., only three patients had vomiting, and two patients had abdominal distension which lead to postponement of oral feeds. Most of our control group patients complained of discomfort and difficulty in coughing and in bringing out sputum, which was the probable cause for high incidence of pulmonary complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine use of the nasogastric tube adjunct to patient care following bowel surgery may be safely eliminated.</p>","PeriodicalId":89430,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical technique and case report","volume":"7 2","pages":"37-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/29/JSTCR-7-37.PMC4966203.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical technique and case report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2006-8808.185654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction: Routinely postoperative nasogastric decompression was done until the nasogastric drainage is minimal, reoccurrence of bowel sounds and passing flatus. But prolonged nasogastric intubation is associated with complications like basal atelectasis due to poor cough reflux, loss of electrolytes and increased patient morbidity.

Aims and objectives: To study the need for routine use of nasogastric tube post operatively in bowel surgeries with reference to (1) Return of bowel movements (2) Compare the incidence of complications (3) Duration of hospital stay.

Methodology: 100 patients who underwent elective bowel surgery were randomized into two groups: Study group (50): Nasogastric tube was removed immediately after operation or in the recovery room. Control group (50): Underwent nasogastric tube removal postoperatively after the patient passed flatus and audible bowel sounds on auscultation.

Results: Incidence of complications were less in the study group i.e., only three patients had vomiting, and two patients had abdominal distension which lead to postponement of oral feeds. Most of our control group patients complained of discomfort and difficulty in coughing and in bringing out sputum, which was the probable cause for high incidence of pulmonary complications.

Conclusion: Routine use of the nasogastric tube adjunct to patient care following bowel surgery may be safely eliminated.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

选择性肠手术伴或不伴预防性鼻胃减压:一项前瞻性随机试验。
简介:术后常规进行鼻胃减压,直至鼻胃引流减少,肠音再次出现并排便。但长时间的鼻胃插管与并发症相关,如由于咳嗽反流不良、电解质流失和患者发病率增加而引起的基底不张。目的:从(1)排便恢复情况(2)并发症发生率比较(3)住院时间等方面探讨肠外科术后常规使用鼻胃管的必要性。方法:100例择期肠手术患者随机分为两组:研究组(50例):术后立即或在恢复室拔除鼻胃管。对照组(50例):术后患者排便,听诊可听到肠音,行鼻胃管拔除术。结果:研究组并发症发生率较低,仅有3例出现呕吐,2例出现腹胀,导致口服喂养推迟。对照组患者多以咳嗽、咳痰困难为主,这可能是肺部并发症高发的原因。结论:常规使用鼻胃管辅助肠手术后的病人护理可以安全消除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信