DNA methylation changes and TE activity induced in tissue cultures of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki Pub Date : 2016-08-08 eCollection Date: 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1186/s40709-016-0056-5
Renata Orłowska, Joanna Machczyńska, Sylwia Oleszczuk, Janusz Zimny, Piotr Tomasz Bednarek
{"title":"DNA methylation changes and TE activity induced in tissue cultures of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).","authors":"Renata Orłowska, Joanna Machczyńska, Sylwia Oleszczuk, Janusz Zimny, Piotr Tomasz Bednarek","doi":"10.1186/s40709-016-0056-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In vitro plant regeneration via androgenesis or somatic embryogenesis is capable of inducing (epi)mutations that may affect sexual progenies. While epimutations are associated with DNA methylation, mutations could be due to the movement of transposons. The common notion is that both processes are linked. It is being assumed that demethylation activates transposable elements (TEs). Analysis of methylation changes and their relation with TEs activation in tissue cultures requires uniquely derived donor plants (Ds), their regenerants (Rs) and respective progeny (Ps) that would allow discrimination of processes not related to changes introduced via in vitro cultures. Moreover, a set of methods (RP-HPLC, SSAP, and MSTD) is needed to study whether different TEs families are being activated during in vitro tissue culture plant regeneration and whether their activity could be linked to DNA methylation changes or alternative explanations should be considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The in vitro tissue culture plant regeneration in barley was responsible for the induction of DNA methylation in regenerants and conservation of the methylation level in the progeny as shown by the RP-HPLC approach. No difference between andro- and embryo-derived Rs and Ps was observed. The SSAP and MSTD approach revealed that Ds and Rs were more polymorphic than Ps. Moreover, Rs individuals exhibited more polymorphisms with the MSTD than SSAP approach. The differences between Ds, Rs and Ps were also evaluated via ANOVA and AMOVA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stressful conditions during plant regeneration via in vitro tissue cultures affect regenerants and their sexual progeny leading to an increase in global DNA methylation of Rs and Ps compared to Ds in barley. The increased methylation level noted among regenerants remains unchanged in the Ps as indicated via RP-HPLC data. Marker-based experiments suggest that TEs are activated via in vitro tissue cultures and that, independently of the increased methylation, their activity in Rs is greater than in Ps. Thus, the increased methylation level may not correspond to the stabilization of TEs movement at least at the level of regenerants. The presence of TEs variation among Ds that were genetically and epigenetically uniform may suggest that at least some mobile elements may be active, and they may mask variation related to tissue cultures. Thus, tissue cultures may activate some TEs whereas the others remain intact, or their level of movement is changed. Finally, we suggest that sexual reproduction may be responsible for the stabilization of TEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40709-016-0056-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In vitro plant regeneration via androgenesis or somatic embryogenesis is capable of inducing (epi)mutations that may affect sexual progenies. While epimutations are associated with DNA methylation, mutations could be due to the movement of transposons. The common notion is that both processes are linked. It is being assumed that demethylation activates transposable elements (TEs). Analysis of methylation changes and their relation with TEs activation in tissue cultures requires uniquely derived donor plants (Ds), their regenerants (Rs) and respective progeny (Ps) that would allow discrimination of processes not related to changes introduced via in vitro cultures. Moreover, a set of methods (RP-HPLC, SSAP, and MSTD) is needed to study whether different TEs families are being activated during in vitro tissue culture plant regeneration and whether their activity could be linked to DNA methylation changes or alternative explanations should be considered.

Results: The in vitro tissue culture plant regeneration in barley was responsible for the induction of DNA methylation in regenerants and conservation of the methylation level in the progeny as shown by the RP-HPLC approach. No difference between andro- and embryo-derived Rs and Ps was observed. The SSAP and MSTD approach revealed that Ds and Rs were more polymorphic than Ps. Moreover, Rs individuals exhibited more polymorphisms with the MSTD than SSAP approach. The differences between Ds, Rs and Ps were also evaluated via ANOVA and AMOVA.

Conclusions: Stressful conditions during plant regeneration via in vitro tissue cultures affect regenerants and their sexual progeny leading to an increase in global DNA methylation of Rs and Ps compared to Ds in barley. The increased methylation level noted among regenerants remains unchanged in the Ps as indicated via RP-HPLC data. Marker-based experiments suggest that TEs are activated via in vitro tissue cultures and that, independently of the increased methylation, their activity in Rs is greater than in Ps. Thus, the increased methylation level may not correspond to the stabilization of TEs movement at least at the level of regenerants. The presence of TEs variation among Ds that were genetically and epigenetically uniform may suggest that at least some mobile elements may be active, and they may mask variation related to tissue cultures. Thus, tissue cultures may activate some TEs whereas the others remain intact, or their level of movement is changed. Finally, we suggest that sexual reproduction may be responsible for the stabilization of TEs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大麦(Hordeum vulgare L.)组织培养物中诱导的 DNA 甲基化变化和 TE 活性。
背景:通过雄性或体细胞胚胎发生进行体外植物再生能够诱导(表突变),从而影响有性后代。表突变与 DNA 甲基化有关,而突变则可能是由于转座子的移动。人们普遍认为这两个过程是相互关联的。据推测,去甲基化会激活转座子(TE)。分析组织培养物中的甲基化变化及其与转座元件(TEs)激活的关系需要独特的供体植株(Ds)、其再生植株(Rs)和各自的后代(Ps),这样才能区分与体外培养物引入的变化无关的过程。此外,还需要一套方法(RP-HPLC、SSAP 和 MSTD)来研究体外组织培养植物再生过程中是否有不同的 TEs 家族被激活,以及它们的活性是否与 DNA 甲基化变化有关,还是应该考虑其他解释:结果:RP-HPLC方法显示,大麦的离体组织培养植物再生可诱导再生体的DNA甲基化,并保持后代的甲基化水平。在雄性和胚胎衍生的 Rs 和 Ps 之间没有观察到差异。SSAP 和 MSTD 方法显示,Ds 和 Rs 的多态性高于 Ps。Ds、Rs和Ps之间的差异也通过方差分析和AMOVA进行了评估:结论:通过体外组织培养进行植物再生过程中的应激条件会影响再生体及其有性后代,导致大麦中 Rs 和 Ps 的 DNA 整体甲基化水平高于 Ds。如 RP-HPLC 数据所示,再生体中增加的甲基化水平在 Ps 中保持不变。基于标记的实验表明,TEs 是通过体外组织培养激活的,与甲基化水平的提高无关,Rs 中 TEs 的活性高于 Ps。在遗传和表观遗传一致的 Ds 中存在 TEs 变异,这可能表明至少有一些移动元素是活跃的,它们可能掩盖了与组织培养有关的变异。因此,组织培养可能会激活一些 TEs,而其他 TEs 则保持不变,或者它们的移动水平发生了变化。最后,我们认为有性生殖可能是稳定 TEs 的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki is a peer-reviewed, open access, international journal that publishes articles providing novel insights into the major fields of biology. Topics covered in Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki include, but are not limited to: molecular biology, cytology, genetics, evolutionary biology, morphology, development and differentiation, taxonomy, bioinformatics, physiology, marine biology, behaviour, ecology and conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信