Does multi-modal cervical physical therapy improve tinnitus in patients with cervicogenic somatic tinnitus?

S. Michiels , P. Van de Heyning , S. Truijen , A. Hallemans , W. De Hertogh
{"title":"Does multi-modal cervical physical therapy improve tinnitus in patients with cervicogenic somatic tinnitus?","authors":"S. Michiels ,&nbsp;P. Van de Heyning ,&nbsp;S. Truijen ,&nbsp;A. Hallemans ,&nbsp;W. De Hertogh","doi":"10.1016/j.math.2016.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Tinnitus can be related to many different aetiologies such as hearing loss or a noise trauma, but it can also be related to the somatosensory system of the cervical spine, called cervicogenic somatic tinnitus (CST). Case studies suggest a positive effect of cervical spine treatment on tinnitus complaints in patients with CST, but no experimental studies are available.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the effect of a multimodal cervical physical therapy treatment on tinnitus complaints in patients with CST.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Patients with a combination of severe subjective tinnitus (Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): 25–90 points) and neck complaints (Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) &gt; 14 points).</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>All patients received cervical physical therapy for 6 weeks (12 sessions). Patients were randomized in an immediate-start therapy group (n = 19) and a 6-week delayed-start therapy group (n = 19).</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>TFI and NBQ-scores were documented at baseline, after the wait-and-see period in the delayed-start group, after treatment and after 6 weeks follow-up. The Global Perceived Effect (GPE) was documented at all measuring moments, except at baseline.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In all patients (n = 38) TFI and NBQ-scores decreased significantly after treatment (p = 0.04 and p &lt; 0.001). NBQ-scores remained significantly lower after follow-up (p = 0.001). Immediately after treatment, 53% (n = 38) experienced substantial improvement of tinnitus. This effect was maintained in 24% of patients after follow-up at six weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cervical physical therapy can have a positive effect on subjective tinnitus complaints in patients with a combination of tinnitus and neck complaints. Larger studies, using more responsive outcome measures, are however necessary to prove this effect.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p><span>NCT02016313</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49889,"journal":{"name":"Manual Therapy","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 125-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.math.2016.08.005","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manual Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X16307007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

Background

Tinnitus can be related to many different aetiologies such as hearing loss or a noise trauma, but it can also be related to the somatosensory system of the cervical spine, called cervicogenic somatic tinnitus (CST). Case studies suggest a positive effect of cervical spine treatment on tinnitus complaints in patients with CST, but no experimental studies are available.

Objective

To investigate the effect of a multimodal cervical physical therapy treatment on tinnitus complaints in patients with CST.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Patients

Patients with a combination of severe subjective tinnitus (Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): 25–90 points) and neck complaints (Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) > 14 points).

Intervention

All patients received cervical physical therapy for 6 weeks (12 sessions). Patients were randomized in an immediate-start therapy group (n = 19) and a 6-week delayed-start therapy group (n = 19).

Measurements

TFI and NBQ-scores were documented at baseline, after the wait-and-see period in the delayed-start group, after treatment and after 6 weeks follow-up. The Global Perceived Effect (GPE) was documented at all measuring moments, except at baseline.

Results

In all patients (n = 38) TFI and NBQ-scores decreased significantly after treatment (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001). NBQ-scores remained significantly lower after follow-up (p = 0.001). Immediately after treatment, 53% (n = 38) experienced substantial improvement of tinnitus. This effect was maintained in 24% of patients after follow-up at six weeks.

Conclusion

Cervical physical therapy can have a positive effect on subjective tinnitus complaints in patients with a combination of tinnitus and neck complaints. Larger studies, using more responsive outcome measures, are however necessary to prove this effect.

Trial registration

NCT02016313.

多模式颈椎物理治疗是否能改善颈源性躯体耳鸣患者的耳鸣?
耳鸣可能与许多不同的病因有关,如听力损失或噪音创伤,但它也可能与颈椎的体感系统有关,称为颈源性躯体耳鸣(CST)。病例研究表明,颈椎治疗对CST患者的耳鸣主诉有积极作用,但没有实验研究。目的探讨多模式颈椎物理疗法对CST患者耳鸣主诉的治疗效果。设计随机对照试验。伴有严重主观性耳鸣(耳鸣功能指数(TFI): 25-90分)和颈部不适(颈部伯恩茅斯问卷(NBQ) >14分)。所有患者均接受宫颈物理治疗6周(12个疗程)。患者随机分为立即开始治疗组(n = 19)和延迟6周开始治疗组(n = 19)。stfi和nbq评分分别记录于基线、延迟启动组等待观察期后、治疗后和6周随访后。除基线外,所有测量时刻均记录了全球感知效应(GPE)。结果所有患者(n = 38)治疗后TFI和nbq评分均显著降低(p = 0.04, p <0.001)。随访后nbq得分仍显著降低(p = 0.001)。治疗后立即,53% (n = 38)的耳鸣明显改善。在随访6周后,24%的患者保持了这种效果。结论颈椎物理治疗对耳鸣合并颈部主诉患者主观耳鸣主诉有积极作用。然而,需要更大规模的研究,使用更敏感的结果测量来证明这种效果。registrationNCT02016313审判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manual Therapy
Manual Therapy 医学-康复医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信