Fraction of Missing Information (γ) at Different Missing Data Fractions in the 2012 NAMCS Physician Workflow Mail Survey.

应用数学(英文) Pub Date : 2016-06-01 Epub Date: 2016-06-15 DOI:10.4236/am.2016.710093
Qiyuan Pan, Rong Wei
{"title":"Fraction of Missing Information (<i>γ</i>) at Different Missing Data Fractions in the 2012 NAMCS Physician Workflow Mail Survey.","authors":"Qiyuan Pan,&nbsp;Rong Wei","doi":"10.4236/am.2016.710093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In his 1987 classic book on multiple imputation (MI), Rubin used the fraction of missing information, <i>γ</i>, to define the relative efficiency (RE) of MI as RE = (1 + <i>γ</i>/<i>m</i>)<sup>-1/2</sup>, where <i>m</i> is the number of imputations, leading to the conclusion that a small <i>m</i> (≤5) would be sufficient for MI. However, evidence has been accumulating that many more imputations are needed. Why would the apparently sufficient <i>m</i> deduced from the RE be actually too small? The answer may lie with <i>γ</i>. In this research, <i>γ</i> was determined at the fractions of missing data (<i>δ</i>) of 4%, 10%, 20%, and 29% using the 2012 Physician Workflow Mail Survey of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). The <i>γ</i> values were strikingly small, ranging in the order of 10<sup>-6</sup> to 0.01. As <i>δ</i> increased, <i>γ</i> usually increased but sometimes decreased. How the data were analysed had the dominating effects on <i>γ</i>, overshadowing the effect of <i>δ</i>. The results suggest that it is impossible to predict <i>γ</i> using <i>δ</i> and that it may not be appropriate to use the <i>γ</i>-based RE to determine sufficient <i>m</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":64940,"journal":{"name":"应用数学(英文)","volume":"7 10","pages":"1057-1067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934387/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"应用数学(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.710093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In his 1987 classic book on multiple imputation (MI), Rubin used the fraction of missing information, γ, to define the relative efficiency (RE) of MI as RE = (1 + γ/m)-1/2, where m is the number of imputations, leading to the conclusion that a small m (≤5) would be sufficient for MI. However, evidence has been accumulating that many more imputations are needed. Why would the apparently sufficient m deduced from the RE be actually too small? The answer may lie with γ. In this research, γ was determined at the fractions of missing data (δ) of 4%, 10%, 20%, and 29% using the 2012 Physician Workflow Mail Survey of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). The γ values were strikingly small, ranging in the order of 10-6 to 0.01. As δ increased, γ usually increased but sometimes decreased. How the data were analysed had the dominating effects on γ, overshadowing the effect of δ. The results suggest that it is impossible to predict γ using δ and that it may not be appropriate to use the γ-based RE to determine sufficient m.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2012年NAMCS医师工作流程邮件调查中不同缺失数据部分的缺失信息比例(γ)
在1987年的经典著作《多重归算》(MI)中,Rubin使用缺失信息的分数γ将MI的相对效率(RE)定义为RE = (1 + γ/m)-1/2,其中m是归算的数量,从而得出结论,对于MI来说,一个小m(≤5)就足够了。然而,越来越多的证据表明需要更多的归算。为什么从RE推导出的明显足够的m实际上太小了?答案可能与γ有关。在本研究中,利用2012年全国门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)的医生工作流程邮件调查,在缺失数据(δ)的4%、10%、20%和29%的分数处确定γ。γ值非常小,范围在10-6到0.01之间。随着δ的增大,γ通常增大,但有时减小。数据的分析方式对γ的影响占主导地位,掩盖了δ的影响。结果表明,用δ来预测γ是不可能的,用γ基RE来确定足够的m可能是不合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1863
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信