COMBINED BLOCK OF THE FEMORAL AND LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVES UNDER ULTRASOUND FOR POST- OPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING HIP SURGERY: A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED TRIAL.

Maroun Badwi Ghabach, Jamil Marwan Elmawieh, May Semaan Matta, May Rady Helou
{"title":"COMBINED BLOCK OF THE FEMORAL AND LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVES UNDER ULTRASOUND FOR POST- OPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING HIP SURGERY: A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED TRIAL.","authors":"Maroun Badwi Ghabach,&nbsp;Jamil Marwan Elmawieh,&nbsp;May Semaan Matta,&nbsp;May Rady Helou","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate pain management of post-operative pain of patients undergoing hip surgery can result in morbidity and mortality complications. Anatomically, pain resulted from the incision site innervation (Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve) and the hip joint innervation mainly the femoral nerve. Adding femoral nerve blockade to the multimodal regimen for postoperative pain control after hip surgery has been described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>all 31 patients included in the study received preoperatively combined FN and LFCN block with Normal Saline 0, 9% (group I) or bupivacaine 0.5% (group II) randomly by using a previously generated continuous randomization list kept in a closed envelope. Pain control regimen consisted of Perfalgan 1g IV every 6 hours systematically and Dolosal 50 mg IM every 6 hours if needed (i.e. VAS > 4). Pain level was measured by using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for the first 24 hours.Time to the first request of analgesia and the total dose of dolosal were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of patients who requested narcotics was significantly higher in group I (8) than group II (3), P=0,044; the total dose of dolosal used was significantly higher in group 1 (50 mg) than group II (9,375mg), P=0,0058. Time to the first request for analgesia was significantly lower in group I (6hrs ± 5,12) as compared to Group II (21.3 hrs ± [Arabic letters: see text]), P =0,043.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, FN and LFCN block when added to the standard regimen for postoperative pain management after hip surgery had a benefit in decreasing pain scores as well as opioid consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":35975,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"23 4","pages":"421-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inadequate pain management of post-operative pain of patients undergoing hip surgery can result in morbidity and mortality complications. Anatomically, pain resulted from the incision site innervation (Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve) and the hip joint innervation mainly the femoral nerve. Adding femoral nerve blockade to the multimodal regimen for postoperative pain control after hip surgery has been described.

Methods: all 31 patients included in the study received preoperatively combined FN and LFCN block with Normal Saline 0, 9% (group I) or bupivacaine 0.5% (group II) randomly by using a previously generated continuous randomization list kept in a closed envelope. Pain control regimen consisted of Perfalgan 1g IV every 6 hours systematically and Dolosal 50 mg IM every 6 hours if needed (i.e. VAS > 4). Pain level was measured by using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for the first 24 hours.Time to the first request of analgesia and the total dose of dolosal were calculated.

Results: The number of patients who requested narcotics was significantly higher in group I (8) than group II (3), P=0,044; the total dose of dolosal used was significantly higher in group 1 (50 mg) than group II (9,375mg), P=0,0058. Time to the first request for analgesia was significantly lower in group I (6hrs ± 5,12) as compared to Group II (21.3 hrs ± [Arabic letters: see text]), P =0,043.

Conclusion: In conclusion, FN and LFCN block when added to the standard regimen for postoperative pain management after hip surgery had a benefit in decreasing pain scores as well as opioid consumption.

超声下联合阻断股外侧皮神经用于髋关节手术患者术后镇痛:一项双盲随机试验。
背景:髋关节手术患者术后疼痛管理不当可导致并发症的发病率和死亡率。解剖上,疼痛源于切口处神经支配(股外侧皮神经)和髋关节神经支配(主要是股神经)。将股神经阻滞加入到髋关节术后疼痛控制的多模式治疗方案中已有报道。方法:所有纳入研究的31例患者术前均采用0.9%生理盐水(I组)或0.5%布比卡因(II组)随机联合FN和LFCN阻滞,采用预先生成的连续随机名单保存在封闭的信封中。疼痛控制方案为每6小时系统给予Perfalgan 1g IV,如有需要,每6小时给予dololas50mg IM(即VAS > 4)。前24小时采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)测量疼痛水平。计算第一次要求镇痛的时间和总剂量。结果:I组(8例)麻醉需要量显著高于II组(3例),P= 0.044;用药总剂量1组(50 mg)显著高于ⅱ组(9375 mg), P= 0.0058。第一次要求镇痛的时间I组(6hrs±5,12)明显低于II组(21.3 hrs±[阿拉伯字母:见文]),P =0,043。结论:总之,将FN和LFCN阻滞添加到髋关节术后疼痛管理的标准方案中,在降低疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗方面具有益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October) and has an Editorial Executive Committee from the department and consultant editors from various Arab countries. A volume consists of six issues. Presently, it is in its 42nd year of publication and is currently in its 19th volume. It has a worldwide circulation and effective March 2008, the MEJA has become an electronic journal. The main objective of the journal is to act as a forum for publication, education, and exchange of opinions, and to promote research and publications of the Middle Eastern heritage of medicine and anesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信