Machine learning identification of EEG features predicting working memory performance in schizophrenia and healthy adults.

Neuropsychiatric electrophysiology Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-02-11 DOI:10.1186/s40810-016-0017-0
Jason K Johannesen, Jinbo Bi, Ruhua Jiang, Joshua G Kenney, Chi-Ming A Chen
{"title":"Machine learning identification of EEG features predicting working memory performance in schizophrenia and healthy adults.","authors":"Jason K Johannesen,&nbsp;Jinbo Bi,&nbsp;Ruhua Jiang,&nbsp;Joshua G Kenney,&nbsp;Chi-Ming A Chen","doi":"10.1186/s40810-016-0017-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With millisecond-level resolution, electroencephalographic (EEG) recording provides a sensitive tool to assay neural dynamics of human cognition. However, selection of EEG features used to answer experimental questions is typically determined <i>a priori</i>. The utility of machine learning was investigated as a computational framework for extracting the most relevant features from EEG data empirically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Schizophrenia (SZ; <i>n</i> = 40) and healthy community (HC; <i>n</i> = 12) subjects completed a Sternberg Working Memory Task (SWMT) during EEG recording. EEG was analyzed to extract 5 <i>frequency components</i> (theta1, theta2, alpha, beta, gamma) at 4 <i>processing stages</i> (baseline, encoding, retention, retrieval) and 3 scalp sites (frontal-Fz, central-Cz, occipital-Oz) separately for correctly and incorrectly answered trials. The 1-norm support vector machine (SVM) method was used to build EEG classifiers of SWMT trial accuracy (correct vs. incorrect; Model 1) and diagnosis (HC vs. SZ; Model 2). External validity of SVM models was examined in relation to neuropsychological test performance and diagnostic classification using conventional regression-based analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SWMT performance was significantly reduced in SZ (<i>p</i> < .001). Model 1 correctly classified trial accuracy at 84 % in HC, and at 74 % when cross-validated in SZ data. Frontal gamma at encoding and central theta at retention provided highest weightings, accounting for 76 % of variance in SWMT scores and 42 % variance in neuropsychological test performance across samples. Model 2 identified frontal theta at baseline and frontal alpha during retrieval as primary classifiers of diagnosis, providing 87 % classification accuracy as a discriminant function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EEG features derived by SVM are consistent with literature reports of gamma's role in memory encoding, engagement of theta during memory retention, and elevated resting low-frequency activity in schizophrenia. Tests of model performance and cross-validation support the stability and generalizability of results, and utility of SVM as an analytic approach for EEG feature selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":91583,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatric electrophysiology","volume":"2 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40810-016-0017-0","citationCount":"101","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatric electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40810-016-0017-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 101

Abstract

Background: With millisecond-level resolution, electroencephalographic (EEG) recording provides a sensitive tool to assay neural dynamics of human cognition. However, selection of EEG features used to answer experimental questions is typically determined a priori. The utility of machine learning was investigated as a computational framework for extracting the most relevant features from EEG data empirically.

Methods: Schizophrenia (SZ; n = 40) and healthy community (HC; n = 12) subjects completed a Sternberg Working Memory Task (SWMT) during EEG recording. EEG was analyzed to extract 5 frequency components (theta1, theta2, alpha, beta, gamma) at 4 processing stages (baseline, encoding, retention, retrieval) and 3 scalp sites (frontal-Fz, central-Cz, occipital-Oz) separately for correctly and incorrectly answered trials. The 1-norm support vector machine (SVM) method was used to build EEG classifiers of SWMT trial accuracy (correct vs. incorrect; Model 1) and diagnosis (HC vs. SZ; Model 2). External validity of SVM models was examined in relation to neuropsychological test performance and diagnostic classification using conventional regression-based analyses.

Results: SWMT performance was significantly reduced in SZ (p < .001). Model 1 correctly classified trial accuracy at 84 % in HC, and at 74 % when cross-validated in SZ data. Frontal gamma at encoding and central theta at retention provided highest weightings, accounting for 76 % of variance in SWMT scores and 42 % variance in neuropsychological test performance across samples. Model 2 identified frontal theta at baseline and frontal alpha during retrieval as primary classifiers of diagnosis, providing 87 % classification accuracy as a discriminant function.

Conclusions: EEG features derived by SVM are consistent with literature reports of gamma's role in memory encoding, engagement of theta during memory retention, and elevated resting low-frequency activity in schizophrenia. Tests of model performance and cross-validation support the stability and generalizability of results, and utility of SVM as an analytic approach for EEG feature selection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器学习识别预测精神分裂症和健康成人工作记忆表现的脑电图特征。
背景:以毫秒级的分辨率,脑电图(EEG)记录提供了一种灵敏的工具来分析人类认知的神经动力学。然而,用于回答实验问题的EEG特征的选择通常是先验确定的。利用机器学习作为一种计算框架,从脑电数据中提取最相关的特征。方法:精神分裂症(SZ;n = 40)和健康社区(HC;n = 12)受试者在EEG记录期间完成了Sternberg工作记忆任务(SWMT)。分析EEG,分别提取4个处理阶段(基线、编码、保留、检索)和3个头皮部位(额- fz、中央- cz、枕- oz)的5个频率分量(theta1、theta2、alpha、beta、gamma),用于正确回答和错误回答的试验。采用1范数支持向量机(SVM)方法构建SWMT试验精度(正确vs不正确;模型1)和诊断(HC vs. SZ;模型2).使用传统的基于回归的分析来检验SVM模型与神经心理测试性能和诊断分类的外部有效性。结果:SZ组SWMT成绩显著降低(p < 0.001)。模型1在HC中正确分类试验准确率为84%,在SZ数据中交叉验证时为74%。编码时的额叶伽马和保留时的中央θ提供了最高的权重,占SWMT分数方差的76%和神经心理测试表现方差的42%。模型2将基线时的额叶θ和检索时的额叶α识别为诊断的主要分类器,作为判别函数提供了87%的分类准确率。结论:支持向量机得出的脑电图特征与文献报道的伽马在记忆编码中的作用、记忆保持过程中theta的参与以及精神分裂症静息低频活动的升高一致。模型性能测试和交叉验证支持了结果的稳定性和泛化性,以及支持向量机作为EEG特征选择分析方法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信