A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF INTRAVENOUS PETHIDINE VS. KETOROLAC AFTER INGUINAL HERNIA SURGERY IN CHILDREN UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA.

Hamid Hajigholam Saryazdi, Omid Aghadavoudi, Amir Shafa, Amin Masoumi, Parnian Saberian
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF INTRAVENOUS PETHIDINE VS. KETOROLAC AFTER INGUINAL HERNIA SURGERY IN CHILDREN UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA.","authors":"Hamid Hajigholam Saryazdi,&nbsp;Omid Aghadavoudi,&nbsp;Amir Shafa,&nbsp;Amin Masoumi,&nbsp;Parnian Saberian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative pain due to tissue damage caused during surgery not only causes discomfort for the patients, but can also result in prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity and respiratory disorders, and readmission to the hospital. For postoperative pain control, numerous methods and medications have been suggested, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and narcotics. Pethidine, as a narcotic analgesic, and ketorolac, as an NSAID, are widely used for pain control. Thus, in this study, the effects of these two drugs were studied and compared in terms of pain control after inguinal hernia surgery in children of 1-12 years of age.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-six children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups. The first group received 0.5 mg/kg ketorolac and the second group received 1 mg/kg pethidine during extubation. Postoperative pain (using Wong Baker pain scale) and complications were measured until 24 hours after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean and standard deviations of postoperative pain 1 hour after surgery in the pethidin and ketorolac groups were 5.06 ± 1.41 and 3.88 ± 0.93, respectively. The scale was significantly lower in the ketorolac group (P < 0.001). Postoperative pain intensity 2 hours after surgery in these two groups was 4.48 ± 1.52 and 3.55 ± 1.15, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was significant (P = 0.006). The variation in postoperative pain intensity in the ketorolac group was statistically lower than the pethidin group (P = 0.020). CONCLUSION.</p>","PeriodicalId":35975,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"23 5","pages":"527-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative pain due to tissue damage caused during surgery not only causes discomfort for the patients, but can also result in prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity and respiratory disorders, and readmission to the hospital. For postoperative pain control, numerous methods and medications have been suggested, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and narcotics. Pethidine, as a narcotic analgesic, and ketorolac, as an NSAID, are widely used for pain control. Thus, in this study, the effects of these two drugs were studied and compared in terms of pain control after inguinal hernia surgery in children of 1-12 years of age.

Materials and methods: Sixty-six children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups. The first group received 0.5 mg/kg ketorolac and the second group received 1 mg/kg pethidine during extubation. Postoperative pain (using Wong Baker pain scale) and complications were measured until 24 hours after surgery.

Results: Mean and standard deviations of postoperative pain 1 hour after surgery in the pethidin and ketorolac groups were 5.06 ± 1.41 and 3.88 ± 0.93, respectively. The scale was significantly lower in the ketorolac group (P < 0.001). Postoperative pain intensity 2 hours after surgery in these two groups was 4.48 ± 1.52 and 3.55 ± 1.15, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was significant (P = 0.006). The variation in postoperative pain intensity in the ketorolac group was statistically lower than the pethidin group (P = 0.020). CONCLUSION.

全麻儿童腹股沟疝术后静脉滴注哌替啶与酮咯酸镇痛效果的比较研究。
导言:手术过程中组织损伤引起的术后疼痛不仅会给患者带来不适,还会导致住院时间延长,发病率和呼吸系统疾病增加,并再次住院。对于术后疼痛的控制,已经提出了许多方法和药物,如非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和麻醉剂。哌替啶是一种麻醉性镇痛药,酮咯酸是一种非甾体抗炎药,广泛用于疼痛控制。因此,本研究对这两种药物在1-12岁儿童腹股沟疝手术后疼痛控制方面的效果进行了研究和比较。材料与方法:选择腹股沟疝修补术患儿66例,随机分为2组。第一组拔管时给予酮咯酸0.5 mg/kg,第二组拔管时给予哌替啶1 mg/kg。术后疼痛(使用Wong Baker疼痛量表)和并发症的测量直到术后24小时。结果:pethidin组和酮咯酸组术后1 h疼痛的均值和标准差分别为5.06±1.41和3.88±0.93。酮罗拉酸组的评分明显低于对照组(P < 0.001)。两组术后2 h疼痛强度分别为4.48±1.52、3.55±1.15,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P = 0.006)。酮罗拉酸组术后疼痛强度变化差异有统计学意义(P = 0.020)。结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October) and has an Editorial Executive Committee from the department and consultant editors from various Arab countries. A volume consists of six issues. Presently, it is in its 42nd year of publication and is currently in its 19th volume. It has a worldwide circulation and effective March 2008, the MEJA has become an electronic journal. The main objective of the journal is to act as a forum for publication, education, and exchange of opinions, and to promote research and publications of the Middle Eastern heritage of medicine and anesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信