Cardiovascular Responses to an Isometric Handgrip Exercise in Females with Prehypertension.

Vernon Bond, Bryan H Curry, Richard G Adams, Thomas Obisesan, Sudhakar Pemminati, Vasavi R Gorantla, Kishan Kadur, Richard M Millis
{"title":"Cardiovascular Responses to an Isometric Handgrip Exercise in Females with Prehypertension.","authors":"Vernon Bond, Bryan H Curry, Richard G Adams, Thomas Obisesan, Sudhakar Pemminati, Vasavi R Gorantla, Kishan Kadur, Richard M Millis","doi":"10.4103/1947-2714.185032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertensive individuals are known to exhibit greater increases in blood pressure during an isometric handgrip exercise (IHE) than their normotensive counterparts.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study tests the hypothesis that, compared to normotensive individuals, prehypertensive individuals exhibit an exaggerated response to IHE.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, the effects of IHE were compared in matched prehypertensive vs. normotensive healthy African-American females. Six healthy young adult African-American female university students were screened in a physician's office for blood pressure in the range of prehypertension, systolic blood pressure (SBP) 120-139 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 80-89 mmHg. Six young adult African-American women were also recruited to serve as a healthy normotensive control group with SBP ≤119 mmHg and DBP ≤79 mmHg. Cardiovascular fitness was determined by peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) measured during a progressive exercise test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the handgrip exercise, the prehypertensive group exhibited greater increases in SBP (from 139 ± 6 to 205 ± 11 mmHg, +48%) than the controls (from 132 ± 3 to 145 ± 3 mmHg, +10%); intergroup difference P < 0.001. The prehypertensive group also exhibited greater increases in DBP (from 77 ± 2 to 112 ± 5 mmHg, +46%) compared to the controls (from 72 ± 3 to 78 ± 4 mmHg, +8%); intergroup difference P < 0.001. The increase in systemic vascular resistance was also greater in the prehypertensive group (from 1713 ± 91 to 2807 ± 370 dyne.s.cm(-5), +64%) than in the controls (from 1668 ± 80 to 1812 ± 169 dyne.s.cm(-5), +9%); intergroup difference P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that blood pressure measurements performed during IHE may be a useful screening tool in evaluating prehypertensive individuals for antihypertensive treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19703,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/71/9f/NAJMS-8-243.PMC4960933.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.185032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive individuals are known to exhibit greater increases in blood pressure during an isometric handgrip exercise (IHE) than their normotensive counterparts.

Aim: This study tests the hypothesis that, compared to normotensive individuals, prehypertensive individuals exhibit an exaggerated response to IHE.

Materials and methods: In this study, the effects of IHE were compared in matched prehypertensive vs. normotensive healthy African-American females. Six healthy young adult African-American female university students were screened in a physician's office for blood pressure in the range of prehypertension, systolic blood pressure (SBP) 120-139 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 80-89 mmHg. Six young adult African-American women were also recruited to serve as a healthy normotensive control group with SBP ≤119 mmHg and DBP ≤79 mmHg. Cardiovascular fitness was determined by peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) measured during a progressive exercise test.

Results: During the handgrip exercise, the prehypertensive group exhibited greater increases in SBP (from 139 ± 6 to 205 ± 11 mmHg, +48%) than the controls (from 132 ± 3 to 145 ± 3 mmHg, +10%); intergroup difference P < 0.001. The prehypertensive group also exhibited greater increases in DBP (from 77 ± 2 to 112 ± 5 mmHg, +46%) compared to the controls (from 72 ± 3 to 78 ± 4 mmHg, +8%); intergroup difference P < 0.001. The increase in systemic vascular resistance was also greater in the prehypertensive group (from 1713 ± 91 to 2807 ± 370 dyne.s.cm(-5), +64%) than in the controls (from 1668 ± 80 to 1812 ± 169 dyne.s.cm(-5), +9%); intergroup difference P < 0.05.

Conclusion: These results suggest that blood pressure measurements performed during IHE may be a useful screening tool in evaluating prehypertensive individuals for antihypertensive treatments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

高血压前期女性对等长手握运动的心血管反应
背景:目的:本研究验证了一个假设,即与正常血压的人相比,高血压前期的人对等长手握运动(IHE)表现出更高的血压升高:本研究比较了高血压前期与正常血压健康非裔美国女性对 IHE 的影响。六名健康的年轻成年非洲裔美国女大学生在医生办公室接受了血压筛查,其血压范围为高血压前期(收缩压 (SBP) 120-139 mmHg,舒张压 (DBP) 80-89 mmHg)。此外,还招募了六名年轻的非洲裔成年女性作为血压正常的健康对照组,她们的收缩压(SBP)≤119 mmHg,舒张压(DBP)≤79 mmHg。心血管健康状况通过在渐进运动测试中测量的峰值摄氧量(VO2 峰值)来确定:结果:在徒手握力运动中,高血压前期组的 SBP 升高幅度(从 139 ± 6 mmHg 升至 205 ± 11 mmHg,+48%)大于对照组(从 132 ± 3 mmHg 升至 145 ± 3 mmHg,+10%);组间差异 P < 0.001。高血压前期组的 DBP(从 77 ± 2 mmHg 升至 112 ± 5 mmHg,+46%)也比对照组(从 72 ± 3 mmHg 升至 78 ± 4 mmHg,+8%)升高得多;组间差异 P < 0.001。与对照组(从 1668 ± 80 到 1812 ± 169 dyne.s.cm(-5),+9%)相比,高血压前期组的全身血管阻力增幅也更大(从 1713 ± 91 到 2807 ± 370 dyne.s.cm(-5),+64%);组间差异 P < 0.05:这些结果表明,在 IHE 期间进行的血压测量可作为一种有用的筛查工具,用于评估高血压前期患者的降压治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信