ANNOTATION TAKEN, IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF CRIMINAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, AS WELL AS IN CRIMINOLOGY, TO THE DECISION OF THE PORTUGUESE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, OF JANUARY 13, 2011--WITH RESPECT TO THE PROBLEMS OF "CONSENT" AND "MEDICAL ACT".

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
MEDICINE AND LAW Pub Date : 2014-07-01
Gonçalo S de Melo Bandeira
{"title":"ANNOTATION TAKEN, IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF CRIMINAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, AS WELL AS IN CRIMINOLOGY, TO THE DECISION OF THE PORTUGUESE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, OF JANUARY 13, 2011--WITH RESPECT TO THE PROBLEMS OF \"CONSENT\" AND \"MEDICAL ACT\".","authors":"Gonçalo S de Melo Bandeira","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>1--Summary of the decision taken by the Portuguese Constitutional Court, of January 13, 2011; 2--Complete text of the decision of the Portuguese Constitutional Court, of January 13, 2011, Judge Maria João ANTUNES (Reporter), Judge Carlos Pamplona de OLIVEIRA, Judge José Borges SOEIRO, Judge Gil GALVÃO, Judge Rui Manuel Moura RAMOS (President)--in terms of the appositive declaration to the sentence n. 487/2010: t.c.http://www. tribunalconstitucional.pt, August 1, 2011; 3--Brief annotation to the problem of the \"medical act\"; 3.1--Plus some conclusions on the brief annotation to the problem of the \"medical act\"; 3.2--Brief annotation to the problem of \"consent\"--continuation of the previous comments; 4--Conclusions. It must never be forgotten that \"consent\" does not stand as the only cause of exclusion of unlawfulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54182,"journal":{"name":"MEDICINE AND LAW","volume":"33 2","pages":"57-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICINE AND LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1--Summary of the decision taken by the Portuguese Constitutional Court, of January 13, 2011; 2--Complete text of the decision of the Portuguese Constitutional Court, of January 13, 2011, Judge Maria João ANTUNES (Reporter), Judge Carlos Pamplona de OLIVEIRA, Judge José Borges SOEIRO, Judge Gil GALVÃO, Judge Rui Manuel Moura RAMOS (President)--in terms of the appositive declaration to the sentence n. 487/2010: t.c.http://www. tribunalconstitucional.pt, August 1, 2011; 3--Brief annotation to the problem of the "medical act"; 3.1--Plus some conclusions on the brief annotation to the problem of the "medical act"; 3.2--Brief annotation to the problem of "consent"--continuation of the previous comments; 4--Conclusions. It must never be forgotten that "consent" does not stand as the only cause of exclusion of unlawfulness.

从刑法和宪法以及犯罪学的角度,对葡萄牙宪法法院2011年1月13日关于"同意"和"医疗行为"问题的裁决作出注释。
1-葡萄牙宪法法院于2011年1月13日作出的决定摘要;2——葡萄牙宪法法院2011年1月13日Maria jo o ANTUNES法官(记者)、Carlos Pamplona de OLIVEIRA法官、josessere Borges SOEIRO法官、Gil法官GALVÃO、Rui Manuel Moura RAMOS法官(庭长)关于第487/2010号判决的赞成声明的决定全文:http://www。宪法法庭,2011年8月1日;3——对“医疗行为”问题的简要注解;3.1——对“医疗行为”问题的简要注释加上一些结论;3.2——对“同意”问题的简要注释——延续前面的评论;4——结论。绝不能忘记,“同意”不是排除非法行为的唯一原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信