[Effects of different training methods for palpation per rectum of internal genital organs on learning success and self-evaluation of students].

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Hannah Giese, Jan P Ehlers, Yasmin Gundelach, Katja Geuenich, Marc Dilly
{"title":"[Effects of different training methods for palpation per rectum of internal genital organs on learning success and self-evaluation of students].","authors":"Hannah Giese,&nbsp;Jan P Ehlers,&nbsp;Yasmin Gundelach,&nbsp;Katja Geuenich,&nbsp;Marc Dilly","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large animal veterinary practice is more and more emphasizing herd-health-management. Processes to ensure and optimize economic viability of dairy farming are becoming more important in comparison to treatment of single ill animals. Amongst others, rectal palpation skills are crucial for proper fertility management, rapid and correct diagnosis of early pregnancies, and recognition of cycle or fertility problems. The aim of this study was first to objectively analyse the effectiveness of prevailing teaching methods for rectal palpation of the reproductive tract during the students' \"agricultural internship.\" Simultaneously, the effectiveness of the use of two teaching simulators prior to the first hands-on experience with live animals was compared with proving just theoretical instruction. The results showed that students acted with more confidence when they were trained in groups of three to five. In particular, the subjective as well as the objective training success was greater for those students, who trained with a simulator (Haptic Cow®, Breed'n Betsy®) than for those who only had theoretical training. Furthermore simulator training resulted in a more realistic student assessment of performance, as well as in a better understanding of where reproductive structures were located (cervix, uterus) in live animals. No significant difference in effect of training was found between the different simulators used here. The results of this study suggest that it is in the interest, not only of students but also of the animals, that simulator training occurs before exercises are performed on living animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":8761,"journal":{"name":"Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift","volume":"129 5-6","pages":"216-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large animal veterinary practice is more and more emphasizing herd-health-management. Processes to ensure and optimize economic viability of dairy farming are becoming more important in comparison to treatment of single ill animals. Amongst others, rectal palpation skills are crucial for proper fertility management, rapid and correct diagnosis of early pregnancies, and recognition of cycle or fertility problems. The aim of this study was first to objectively analyse the effectiveness of prevailing teaching methods for rectal palpation of the reproductive tract during the students' "agricultural internship." Simultaneously, the effectiveness of the use of two teaching simulators prior to the first hands-on experience with live animals was compared with proving just theoretical instruction. The results showed that students acted with more confidence when they were trained in groups of three to five. In particular, the subjective as well as the objective training success was greater for those students, who trained with a simulator (Haptic Cow®, Breed'n Betsy®) than for those who only had theoretical training. Furthermore simulator training resulted in a more realistic student assessment of performance, as well as in a better understanding of where reproductive structures were located (cervix, uterus) in live animals. No significant difference in effect of training was found between the different simulators used here. The results of this study suggest that it is in the interest, not only of students but also of the animals, that simulator training occurs before exercises are performed on living animals.

[内生殖器直肠触诊不同训练方法对学生学习成功及自我评价的影响]。
大型动物兽医实践越来越重视畜群健康管理。与治疗单个患病动物相比,确保和优化奶牛养殖经济可行性的过程变得更加重要。其中,直肠触诊技巧对于适当的生育管理,快速正确诊断早孕以及识别周期或生育问题至关重要。本研究的目的首先是客观分析在学生“农业实习”期间,现行生殖道直肠触诊教学方法的有效性。同时,在第一次与活体动物的实践经验之前使用两个教学模拟器的有效性与证明仅仅是理论教学进行了比较。结果显示,当学生们以三到五人为一组进行训练时,他们表现得更自信。特别是,那些使用模拟器(Haptic Cow®,Breed'n Betsy®)进行训练的学生,其主观和客观训练的成功率都高于那些只接受理论训练的学生。此外,模拟器训练导致了更现实的学生绩效评估,以及在一个更好的理解生殖结构的位置(宫颈,子宫)在活的动物。不同的模拟器在训练效果上没有显著差异。这项研究的结果表明,在对活体动物进行练习之前进行模拟器训练,不仅符合学生的利益,也符合动物的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of veterinary public health and its related subjects, such as epidemiology, bacteriology, virology, pathology, immunology, parasitology, and mycology. The journal publishes original research papers, review articles, case studies and short communications on farm animals, companion animals, equines, wild animals and laboratory animals. In addition, the editors regularly commission special issues on topics of major importance. The journal’s articles are published either in German or English and always include an abstract in the other language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信