Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities - early single center experiences.

Q2 Medicine
Tomke Cordts, Johannes Horter, Julian Vogelpohl, Thomas Kremer, Ulrich Kneser, Jochen-Frederick Hernekamp
{"title":"Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities - early single center experiences.","authors":"Tomke Cordts,&nbsp;Johannes Horter,&nbsp;Julian Vogelpohl,&nbsp;Thomas Kremer,&nbsp;Ulrich Kneser,&nbsp;Jochen-Frederick Hernekamp","doi":"10.1186/s12895-016-0045-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe burns of hands and arms are complex and challenging injuries. The Standard of care (SOC) - necrosectomy with skin grafting - is often associated with poor functional or aesthetic outcome. Enzymatic debridement (ED) is considered one promising alternative but, until recently, results proved to be highly variable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 04/2014 and 04/2015, 16 patients with deep partial- to full-thickness burns of the upper extremities underwent enzymatic debridement (ED) in our Burn Center and were evaluated for extent of additional surgery, wound healing, pain management and functional parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following ED, no further surgical intervention was required in 53.8 % of the study population. In patients who required surgical treatment, the the skin-grafted area could be reduced by 37.0 % when compared to initial assessment. Time from injury to ED was 24.4 h and patients were able to start physical therapy after 2.0 days but suffered from prolonged wound closure (28.0 days). Regionally administered anesthesia proved to be superior to pain medication alone as pain levels and consumed morphine-equivalent were lower. Post-demission follow-up showed good functional results and pain levels with low scores in two self-report questionnaires (DASH, PRWE-G) but 3 patients reported increased susceptibility to shear stress. Based on these early experiences, we developed a 3-step algorithm for consecutive patients allowing appropriate and individualized treatment selection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We see a potential benefit for ED in the treatment of severely burned hands and forearms but further investigations and proper prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to statistically support any outlined assumptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-016-0045-2","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-016-0045-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

Background: Severe burns of hands and arms are complex and challenging injuries. The Standard of care (SOC) - necrosectomy with skin grafting - is often associated with poor functional or aesthetic outcome. Enzymatic debridement (ED) is considered one promising alternative but, until recently, results proved to be highly variable.

Methods: Between 04/2014 and 04/2015, 16 patients with deep partial- to full-thickness burns of the upper extremities underwent enzymatic debridement (ED) in our Burn Center and were evaluated for extent of additional surgery, wound healing, pain management and functional parameters.

Results: Following ED, no further surgical intervention was required in 53.8 % of the study population. In patients who required surgical treatment, the the skin-grafted area could be reduced by 37.0 % when compared to initial assessment. Time from injury to ED was 24.4 h and patients were able to start physical therapy after 2.0 days but suffered from prolonged wound closure (28.0 days). Regionally administered anesthesia proved to be superior to pain medication alone as pain levels and consumed morphine-equivalent were lower. Post-demission follow-up showed good functional results and pain levels with low scores in two self-report questionnaires (DASH, PRWE-G) but 3 patients reported increased susceptibility to shear stress. Based on these early experiences, we developed a 3-step algorithm for consecutive patients allowing appropriate and individualized treatment selection.

Conclusions: We see a potential benefit for ED in the treatment of severely burned hands and forearms but further investigations and proper prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to statistically support any outlined assumptions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

酶清创治疗严重烧伤上肢-早期单中心经验。
背景:手部和手臂严重烧伤是一种复杂且具有挑战性的损伤。标准护理(SOC) -坏死性切开术与皮肤移植-往往与不良的功能或美观的结果有关。酶清创(ED)被认为是一种有希望的替代方法,但直到最近,结果被证明是高度可变的。方法:2014年4月至2015年4月,16例上肢深度部分至全层烧伤患者在我们的烧伤中心接受了酶清创(ED)治疗,并评估了额外手术的程度、伤口愈合、疼痛管理和功能参数。结果:在ED后,53.8%的研究人群不需要进一步的手术干预。在需要手术治疗的患者中,与初始评估相比,植皮面积可减少37.0%。从损伤到ED的时间为24.4 h,患者在2.0天后可以开始物理治疗,但伤口愈合时间较长(28.0天)。局部麻醉被证明优于单独止痛药,因为疼痛水平和消耗的吗啡当量较低。出院后随访显示功能恢复良好,两项自我报告问卷(DASH, PRWE-G)得分较低,疼痛水平较低,但有3例患者报告剪应力易感性增加。基于这些早期的经验,我们为连续患者开发了一个三步算法,允许适当和个性化的治疗选择。结论:我们看到ED治疗手部和前臂严重烧伤的潜在益处,但需要进一步的调查和适当的前瞻性随机对照试验来统计支持任何概述的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Dermatology
BMC Dermatology Medicine-Dermatology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Dermatology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of skin disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. BMC Dermatology (ISSN 1471-5945) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, MEDLINE, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信