The efficacy of Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate combination in early Class III treatment: a novel approach and pilot study.

Q Medicine
Australian Orthodontic Journal Pub Date : 2016-05-01
Vandana Katyal, Benedict Wilmes, Manuel Nienkemper, M Ali Darendeliler, Wayne Sampson, Dieter Drescher
{"title":"The efficacy of Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate combination in early Class III treatment: a novel approach and pilot study.","authors":"Vandana Katyal,&nbsp;Benedict Wilmes,&nbsp;Manuel Nienkemper,&nbsp;M Ali Darendeliler,&nbsp;Wayne Sampson,&nbsp;Dieter Drescher","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the present study was to assess the skeletal, dental and soft tissue effects of a specific treatment protocol in consecutively treated patients who presented with a Class III malocclusion. Treatment involved the use of a Hybrid Hyrax (HH) in the maxilla, a Mentoplate in the mandible and the application of continuous intra-oral Class III elastics.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The treated group was comprised of seven males and seven females (mean pretreatment age 10.4 ± 1.7 yr, range 7.8-12.9 yr). Treatment changes were analysed on lateral cephalograms taken 6-12 months prior to commencing treatment (T1) and at the finish of the orthopaedic phase (T2). Where a normality assumption was met, a parametric paired-sample t-test was used to assess the change differences at T1 and T2. For non-normal data, a non-parametric Wilcoxon sign rank test for related samples was used to assess T1 and T2 differences. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (2-tailed).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average sagittal changes showed an improved SNA angle of 2.1 ± 2° (p = 0.002), an ANB angle of 1.9 ± 1.8° (p = 0.002), a Wits improvement of 3.4 ± 2.7 mm (p < 0.001) and an overjet reduction of 2.0 ± 2.2 mm (p = 0.005). There were no statistically significant correlations found between the age at T1, age at treatment start and age at T2 and the changes identified in the cephalometric variables (T2-T1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HH-Mentoplate Class III treatment protocol induced a mean Wits improvement of 3.4 mm in the maxillary and mandibular sagittal base relationship at the functional occlusal level. This was primarily achieved by sagittal maxillary skeletal protraction with negligible effects on the mandible, facial vertical dimension and the incisor angulations. A controlled clinical study with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up times is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55417,"journal":{"name":"Australian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"88-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to assess the skeletal, dental and soft tissue effects of a specific treatment protocol in consecutively treated patients who presented with a Class III malocclusion. Treatment involved the use of a Hybrid Hyrax (HH) in the maxilla, a Mentoplate in the mandible and the application of continuous intra-oral Class III elastics.

Method: The treated group was comprised of seven males and seven females (mean pretreatment age 10.4 ± 1.7 yr, range 7.8-12.9 yr). Treatment changes were analysed on lateral cephalograms taken 6-12 months prior to commencing treatment (T1) and at the finish of the orthopaedic phase (T2). Where a normality assumption was met, a parametric paired-sample t-test was used to assess the change differences at T1 and T2. For non-normal data, a non-parametric Wilcoxon sign rank test for related samples was used to assess T1 and T2 differences. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (2-tailed).

Results: The average sagittal changes showed an improved SNA angle of 2.1 ± 2° (p = 0.002), an ANB angle of 1.9 ± 1.8° (p = 0.002), a Wits improvement of 3.4 ± 2.7 mm (p < 0.001) and an overjet reduction of 2.0 ± 2.2 mm (p = 0.005). There were no statistically significant correlations found between the age at T1, age at treatment start and age at T2 and the changes identified in the cephalometric variables (T2-T1).

Conclusion: The HH-Mentoplate Class III treatment protocol induced a mean Wits improvement of 3.4 mm in the maxillary and mandibular sagittal base relationship at the functional occlusal level. This was primarily achieved by sagittal maxillary skeletal protraction with negligible effects on the mandible, facial vertical dimension and the incisor angulations. A controlled clinical study with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up times is needed.

混合Hyrax-Mentoplate在早期III类治疗中的疗效:一种新方法和试点研究。
本研究的目的是评估连续治疗的III类错牙合患者的特定治疗方案对骨骼、牙齿和软组织的影响。治疗包括在上颌骨使用Hybrid Hyrax (HH),下颌骨使用Mentoplate和使用连续的口内III类弹性材料。方法:治疗组男性7例,女性7例,治疗前平均年龄10.4±1.7岁,范围7.8 ~ 12.9岁。通过开始治疗前6-12个月(T1)和矫形期结束时(T2)的侧位脑电图分析治疗变化。在符合正态性假设的情况下,使用参数配对样本t检验来评估T1和T2的变化差异。对于非正态数据,使用相关样本的非参数Wilcoxon符号秩检验来评估T1和T2差异。p < 0.05为差异有统计学意义(双尾)。结果:矢状面平均SNA角改善2.1±2°(p = 0.002), ANB角改善1.9±1.8°(p = 0.002), Wits改善3.4±2.7 mm (p < 0.001), overjet减少2.0±2.2 mm (p = 0.005)。T1时的年龄、治疗开始时的年龄和T2时的年龄与头颅测量变量(T2-T1)的变化之间没有统计学上的显著相关性。结论:HH-Mentoplate III类治疗方案在功能咬合水平上使上颌和下颌矢状基面关系平均改善3.4 mm。这主要是通过矢状上颌骨骼延伸来实现的,对下颌骨、面部垂直尺寸和门牙角度的影响可以忽略不计。需要更大样本量和更长的随访时间的对照临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Orthodontic Journal
Australian Orthodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.48
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信