Effects of Vibration Therapy in Pediatric Immunizations.

Q3 Nursing
Pediatric nursing Pub Date : 2016-05-01
Arika L Benjamin, Thomas J Hendrix, Jacque L Woody
{"title":"Effects of Vibration Therapy in Pediatric Immunizations.","authors":"Arika L Benjamin,&nbsp;Thomas J Hendrix,&nbsp;Jacque L Woody","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A randomized clinical trial of 100 children (52 boys, 48 girls) ages 2 months to 7 years was conducted to evaluate the effect of vibration therapy without cold analgesia on pain. A convenience sample was recruited at two sites: a publicly funded, free immunization clinic and a private group pediatric practice. Participants were randomly assigned to receive vibration therapy via a specialized vibrating device or standard care. All children regardless of intervention group were allowed to be distracted and soothed by the parent. Pain was evaluated using the FLACC score, which two nurses assessed at three points in time: prior to, during, and after the injection(s). Data were analyzed using a two-independent samples-paired t-test. Results show that vibration therapy had no effect on pain scores in the younger age groups studied (2 months ≤ 1 year, > 1 year ≤ 4 years). In the oldest age group (> 4 to 7 years of age), a heightened pain reading was found in the period from preinjection to post-injection periods (p = 0.045). These results indicate that the addition of vibration therapy (without cold analgesia) to standard soothing techniques is no more effective in reducing immunization pain than standard soothing techniques alone, and thus, is not indicated for use with immunization pain. Recommendations include further evaluation of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":35613,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric nursing","volume":"42 3","pages":"124-9; discussion 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A randomized clinical trial of 100 children (52 boys, 48 girls) ages 2 months to 7 years was conducted to evaluate the effect of vibration therapy without cold analgesia on pain. A convenience sample was recruited at two sites: a publicly funded, free immunization clinic and a private group pediatric practice. Participants were randomly assigned to receive vibration therapy via a specialized vibrating device or standard care. All children regardless of intervention group were allowed to be distracted and soothed by the parent. Pain was evaluated using the FLACC score, which two nurses assessed at three points in time: prior to, during, and after the injection(s). Data were analyzed using a two-independent samples-paired t-test. Results show that vibration therapy had no effect on pain scores in the younger age groups studied (2 months ≤ 1 year, > 1 year ≤ 4 years). In the oldest age group (> 4 to 7 years of age), a heightened pain reading was found in the period from preinjection to post-injection periods (p = 0.045). These results indicate that the addition of vibration therapy (without cold analgesia) to standard soothing techniques is no more effective in reducing immunization pain than standard soothing techniques alone, and thus, is not indicated for use with immunization pain. Recommendations include further evaluation of interventions.

振动疗法在儿童免疫接种中的作用。
我们对100名2个月至7岁的儿童(52名男孩,48名女孩)进行了随机临床试验,以评估振动治疗不冷镇痛对疼痛的影响。在两个地点招募了方便样本:一个公共资助的免费免疫诊所和一个私人儿科团体诊所。参与者被随机分配通过专门的振动装置或标准护理接受振动治疗。无论干预组如何,所有的孩子都被允许被父母分散注意力和安慰。使用FLACC评分评估疼痛,由两名护士在三个时间点进行评估:注射前、注射中和注射后。数据分析采用两独立样本配对t检验。结果显示,振动治疗对研究年龄组(2个月≤1年,> 1年≤4年)疼痛评分无影响。在年龄最大的年龄组(> 4 ~ 7岁)中,从注射前到注射后,疼痛读数升高(p = 0.045)。这些结果表明,在标准舒缓技术中加入振动疗法(不含冷镇痛)在减轻免疫疼痛方面并不比单独使用标准舒缓技术更有效,因此不适合用于免疫疼痛。建议包括进一步评估干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric nursing
Pediatric nursing Nursing-Pediatrics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Pediatric Nursing is a clinically based journal focusing on the needs of professional nurses in pediatric practice, research, administration, and education. It provides information related to health care for normal, sick, or disabled children and their families; pediatric clients in the hospital, clinic or office, school, community, or home. A variety of feature and department articles highlight current topics and issues in pediatric practice and health policy, serving a wide range of pediatric professionals - from those who practice nursing in acute care or specialty units to those who promote health in nonhospital environments. Published six times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信