Telemedicine and Diabetic Retinopathy: Review of Published Screening Programs.

Journal of endocrinology and diabetes Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-11-11 DOI:10.15226/2374-6890/2/4/00131
Kevin Tozer, Maria A Woodward, Paula A Newman-Casey
{"title":"Telemedicine and Diabetic Retinopathy: Review of Published Screening Programs.","authors":"Kevin Tozer,&nbsp;Maria A Woodward,&nbsp;Paula A Newman-Casey","doi":"10.15226/2374-6890/2/4/00131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness worldwide even though successful treatments exist. Improving screening and treatment could avoid many cases of vision loss. However, due to an increasing prevalence of diabetes, traditional in-person screening for DR for every diabetic patient is not feasible. Telemedicine is one viable solution to provide high-quality and efficient screening to large number of diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide a narrative review of large DR telemedicine screening programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles were identified through a comprehensive search of the English-language literature published between 2000 and 2014. Telemedicine screening programs were included for review if they had published data on at least 150 patients and had available validation studies supporting their model. Screening programs were then categorized according to their American Telemedicine Association Validation Level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven programs from the US and abroad were identified and included in the review. Three programs were Category 1 programs (Ophdiat, EyePacs, and Digiscope), two were Category 2 programs (Eye Check, NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Program), and two were Category 3 programs (Joslin Vision Network, Alberta Screening Program). No program was identified that claimed category 4 status. Programs ranged from community or city level programs to large nationwide programs including millions of individuals. The programs demonstrated a high level of clinical accuracy in screening for DR. There was no consensus amongst the programs regarding the need for dilation, need for stereoscopic images, or the level of training for approved image graders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Telemedicine programs have been clinically validated and successfully implemented across the globe. They can provide a high-level of clinical accuracy for screening for DR while improving patient access in a cost-effective and scalable manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":73731,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endocrinology and diabetes","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942133/pdf/nihms799190.pdf","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endocrinology and diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/2374-6890/2/4/00131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Background: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness worldwide even though successful treatments exist. Improving screening and treatment could avoid many cases of vision loss. However, due to an increasing prevalence of diabetes, traditional in-person screening for DR for every diabetic patient is not feasible. Telemedicine is one viable solution to provide high-quality and efficient screening to large number of diabetic patients.

Purpose: To provide a narrative review of large DR telemedicine screening programs.

Methods: Articles were identified through a comprehensive search of the English-language literature published between 2000 and 2014. Telemedicine screening programs were included for review if they had published data on at least 150 patients and had available validation studies supporting their model. Screening programs were then categorized according to their American Telemedicine Association Validation Level.

Results: Seven programs from the US and abroad were identified and included in the review. Three programs were Category 1 programs (Ophdiat, EyePacs, and Digiscope), two were Category 2 programs (Eye Check, NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Program), and two were Category 3 programs (Joslin Vision Network, Alberta Screening Program). No program was identified that claimed category 4 status. Programs ranged from community or city level programs to large nationwide programs including millions of individuals. The programs demonstrated a high level of clinical accuracy in screening for DR. There was no consensus amongst the programs regarding the need for dilation, need for stereoscopic images, or the level of training for approved image graders.

Conclusion: Telemedicine programs have been clinically validated and successfully implemented across the globe. They can provide a high-level of clinical accuracy for screening for DR while improving patient access in a cost-effective and scalable manner.

远程医疗和糖尿病视网膜病变:已发表的筛查方案综述。
背景:糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是世界范围内失明的主要原因,尽管已有成功的治疗方法。改善筛查和治疗可以避免许多视力丧失病例。然而,由于糖尿病患病率的增加,传统的对每一位糖尿病患者进行DR的面对面筛查是不可行的。远程医疗是为大量糖尿病患者提供高质量、高效筛查的可行解决方案。目的:对大型DR远程医疗筛查项目进行述评。方法:通过对2000年至2014年间发表的英语文献进行全面检索来确定文章。如果远程医疗筛查项目发表了至少150名患者的数据,并有可用的验证研究支持其模型,则该项目将被纳入评估。然后根据他们的美国远程医疗协会验证水平对筛选程序进行分类。结果:从美国和国外确定并纳入了七个项目。三个项目是第一类项目(Ophdiat, EyePacs和Digiscope),两个是第二类项目(眼科检查,NHS糖尿病眼科筛查项目),两个是第三类项目(乔斯林视力网络,艾伯塔省筛查项目)。没有程序被确定为第4类状态。项目范围从社区或城市级别的项目到涉及数百万个人的大型全国性项目。这些项目在dr筛查方面表现出了很高的临床准确性,但在扩张的需要、立体图像的需要或经批准的图像分级者的培训水平方面,这些项目没有达成共识。结论:远程医疗项目已经在全球范围内得到了临床验证和成功实施。它们可以为DR筛查提供高水平的临床准确性,同时以具有成本效益和可扩展的方式改善患者的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信