[Skull fracture or accessory suture in a child?].

Archiv fur Kriminologie Pub Date : 2016-05-01
Katrin Burkhard, Lena M Lange, Stefanie Plenzig, Marcel A Verhoff, Sarah C Kölzer
{"title":"[Skull fracture or accessory suture in a child?].","authors":"Katrin Burkhard,&nbsp;Lena M Lange,&nbsp;Stefanie Plenzig,&nbsp;Marcel A Verhoff,&nbsp;Sarah C Kölzer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Differentiation between accessory sutures and fractures in the skull of an infant can be difficult. Apart from the regular sutures there is a multitude of variations that may be mistaken for a fracture line. Such variations include for instance the intraparietal suture between the two ossification centers of the parietal bone or the mendosal suture between the supraoccipital and interparietal bone of the occipital squama. The presented case refers to an approximately 20-month-old female child. During autopsy, a discontinuity in the right paramedian posterior cranial fossa parallel to the internal occipital crest with connection to the foramen magnum was observed. The macroscopic findings suggested a fracture line because of its course. However, neither a hemorrhage in the soft tissue nor callus formation was discernible. The discontinuity was preserved with the adjacent parts of the occipital bone for further histological examination. In the report of a cranial CT, which was carried out five days before the child's death, an accessory suture paramedially in the right posterior cranial fossa was described. When the clinical CT records were re-evaluated, a similar discontinuity at the corresponding position on the other side was detected, though of noticeably shorter length. Additionally, the preserved occipital bone fragment including the discontinuity was histologically processed. In the radiological literature, precise (radiological) criteria for differential diagnosis are indicated. A zigzag pattern with sclerotic borders and a bilateral and fairly symmetric occurrence indicate a suture, whereas a sharp lucency with non-sclerotic edges and a unilateral occurrence indicate a fracture. Taking all the findings into account, the depicted discontinuity was regarded as an accessory suture. This case demonstrates that differentiation between a fracture and an accessory suture may be difficult in the autopsy of a child and underlines the importance of a postmortem CT examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":8171,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Kriminologie","volume":"237 5-6","pages":"172-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Kriminologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differentiation between accessory sutures and fractures in the skull of an infant can be difficult. Apart from the regular sutures there is a multitude of variations that may be mistaken for a fracture line. Such variations include for instance the intraparietal suture between the two ossification centers of the parietal bone or the mendosal suture between the supraoccipital and interparietal bone of the occipital squama. The presented case refers to an approximately 20-month-old female child. During autopsy, a discontinuity in the right paramedian posterior cranial fossa parallel to the internal occipital crest with connection to the foramen magnum was observed. The macroscopic findings suggested a fracture line because of its course. However, neither a hemorrhage in the soft tissue nor callus formation was discernible. The discontinuity was preserved with the adjacent parts of the occipital bone for further histological examination. In the report of a cranial CT, which was carried out five days before the child's death, an accessory suture paramedially in the right posterior cranial fossa was described. When the clinical CT records were re-evaluated, a similar discontinuity at the corresponding position on the other side was detected, though of noticeably shorter length. Additionally, the preserved occipital bone fragment including the discontinuity was histologically processed. In the radiological literature, precise (radiological) criteria for differential diagnosis are indicated. A zigzag pattern with sclerotic borders and a bilateral and fairly symmetric occurrence indicate a suture, whereas a sharp lucency with non-sclerotic edges and a unilateral occurrence indicate a fracture. Taking all the findings into account, the depicted discontinuity was regarded as an accessory suture. This case demonstrates that differentiation between a fracture and an accessory suture may be difficult in the autopsy of a child and underlines the importance of a postmortem CT examination.

[儿童颅骨骨折或附属缝合?]。
区分婴儿颅骨的附属缝合线和骨折是很困难的。除了常规的缝合线外,还有许多不同的缝合线可能被误认为是骨折线。这种变异包括例如顶骨两个骨化中心之间的顶骨内缝线或枕鳞的枕上骨和顶骨间缝线。本病例涉及一名大约20个月大的女婴。尸检时,在与枕骨大孔相连的右侧后颅窝旁正中平行处观察到一个不连续性。由于其过程,宏观表现为骨折线。然而,既没有软组织出血,也没有骨痂形成。保留与枕骨相邻部分的不连续性,以便进一步进行组织学检查。在儿童死亡前5天进行的头颅CT报告中,描述了右侧后颅窝的辅助缝合。当重新评估临床CT记录时,在另一侧相应位置检测到类似的不连续,尽管长度明显较短。此外,保存的枕骨碎片包括不连续性进行组织学处理。在放射学文献中,明确了鉴别诊断的放射学标准。具有硬化边缘的锯齿形图案和两侧相当对称的出现表明缝合线,而具有非硬化边缘的锐利透光和单侧出现表明骨折。考虑到所有的发现,所描述的不连续性被认为是副缝合线。本病例表明,在儿童尸检中区分骨折和附属缝合线可能很困难,并强调了尸检CT检查的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信