Analysis of micropore size distribution using Dubinin's theory of volume filling - Effect of particle size on pore characterization of organic-rich Indian shales

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Venkata Yasaswy Turlapati , Basanta Kumar Prusty , Dheeraj Kumar Yarlagadda , Samir Kumar Pal , Elangovan Raja
{"title":"Analysis of micropore size distribution using Dubinin's theory of volume filling - Effect of particle size on pore characterization of organic-rich Indian shales","authors":"Venkata Yasaswy Turlapati ,&nbsp;Basanta Kumar Prusty ,&nbsp;Dheeraj Kumar Yarlagadda ,&nbsp;Samir Kumar Pal ,&nbsp;Elangovan Raja","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Micropores play a significant role in adsorption and are abundant in a shale pore structure. The influence of particle size on pore structure parameters, especially micropores, is a subject of primary interest for </span>shale gas characterisation. In this work, a total of 6 samples with varying mineralogical and organic content are selected from 2 Indian </span>sedimentary basins, Cambay and Krishna-Godavari. Selected samples were crushed to different particle sizes 500-425 μm (M1), 425-250 μm (M2), 250-150 μm (M3), and 150-75 μm (M4) and low pressure N</span><sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption experiments at 77 K and 273 K were performed on them. Through these experiments, it was observed that, with crushing of samples to smaller particle sizes low-pressure N<sub>2</sub><span> adsorption tend to show higher values for total pore volume and average pore diameter. The mean difference over all samples for average pore diameter between M4 and M1 particle size is closer to 1 nm. Similarly, the mean difference over all samples for total pore volume between M4 and M1 particle sizes of all samples is 0.005 cc/g, which is almost closer to their micropore volumes. Such inconsistencies in measurements can lead to serious errors in shale gas exploration. Further, the low pressure N</span><sub>2</sub> experiments indicated that M4 particle size samples show higher values of pore structure parameters, and low pressure CO<sub>2</sub> experiments show that M3 particle size shows higher micropore volumes. For further understanding of nano-sized pore contributions, micropore size distributions of the samples have been constructed using Stoeckli pore size distribution function. From these distributions and other analysis, it was concluded that the smallest particle size overestimates the pore structure parameters and M3 particle size is optimum for both low pressure N<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 104746"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187551002200333X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Micropores play a significant role in adsorption and are abundant in a shale pore structure. The influence of particle size on pore structure parameters, especially micropores, is a subject of primary interest for shale gas characterisation. In this work, a total of 6 samples with varying mineralogical and organic content are selected from 2 Indian sedimentary basins, Cambay and Krishna-Godavari. Selected samples were crushed to different particle sizes 500-425 μm (M1), 425-250 μm (M2), 250-150 μm (M3), and 150-75 μm (M4) and low pressure N2 and CO2 adsorption experiments at 77 K and 273 K were performed on them. Through these experiments, it was observed that, with crushing of samples to smaller particle sizes low-pressure N2 adsorption tend to show higher values for total pore volume and average pore diameter. The mean difference over all samples for average pore diameter between M4 and M1 particle size is closer to 1 nm. Similarly, the mean difference over all samples for total pore volume between M4 and M1 particle sizes of all samples is 0.005 cc/g, which is almost closer to their micropore volumes. Such inconsistencies in measurements can lead to serious errors in shale gas exploration. Further, the low pressure N2 experiments indicated that M4 particle size samples show higher values of pore structure parameters, and low pressure CO2 experiments show that M3 particle size shows higher micropore volumes. For further understanding of nano-sized pore contributions, micropore size distributions of the samples have been constructed using Stoeckli pore size distribution function. From these distributions and other analysis, it was concluded that the smallest particle size overestimates the pore structure parameters and M3 particle size is optimum for both low pressure N2 and CO2 adsorption.

用Dubinin体积填充理论分析微孔尺寸分布——粒度对印度富有机质页岩孔隙特征的影响
微孔在页岩孔隙结构中丰富,在吸附中起着重要作用。颗粒大小对孔隙结构参数的影响,特别是对微孔隙的影响,是页岩气表征的主要关注点。本研究从印度Cambay和Krishna-Godavari两个沉积盆地中选取了6个矿物学和有机质含量不同的样品。将选定的样品粉碎成500 ~ 425 μm (M1)、425 ~ 250 μm (M2)、250 ~ 150 μm (M3)和150 ~ 75 μm (M4)的不同粒径,分别在77 K和273 K下进行低压N2和CO2吸附实验。通过这些实验可以观察到,随着试样破碎到更小的粒径,低压N2吸附的总孔容和平均孔径趋于增大。所有样品中M4和M1粒径之间的平均孔径的平均差值接近1 nm。同样,在所有样品中,所有样品的M4和M1粒径之间的总孔隙体积的平均差值为0.005 cc/g,这与它们的微孔体积几乎更接近。这种测量上的不一致可能导致页岩气勘探中的严重错误。此外,低压N2实验表明M4粒径样品的孔隙结构参数值更高,低压CO2实验表明M3粒径样品的微孔体积更高。为了进一步了解纳米孔径的贡献,利用Stoeckli孔径分布函数构建了样品的微孔径分布。从这些分布和其他分析可以得出,最小粒径高估了孔隙结构参数,M3粒径对低压N2和CO2的吸附都是最佳的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信