Analysis of micropore size distribution using Dubinin's theory of volume filling - Effect of particle size on pore characterization of organic-rich Indian shales
Venkata Yasaswy Turlapati , Basanta Kumar Prusty , Dheeraj Kumar Yarlagadda , Samir Kumar Pal , Elangovan Raja
{"title":"Analysis of micropore size distribution using Dubinin's theory of volume filling - Effect of particle size on pore characterization of organic-rich Indian shales","authors":"Venkata Yasaswy Turlapati , Basanta Kumar Prusty , Dheeraj Kumar Yarlagadda , Samir Kumar Pal , Elangovan Raja","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Micropores play a significant role in adsorption and are abundant in a shale pore structure. The influence of particle size on pore structure parameters, especially micropores, is a subject of primary interest for </span>shale gas characterisation. In this work, a total of 6 samples with varying mineralogical and organic content are selected from 2 Indian </span>sedimentary basins, Cambay and Krishna-Godavari. Selected samples were crushed to different particle sizes 500-425 μm (M1), 425-250 μm (M2), 250-150 μm (M3), and 150-75 μm (M4) and low pressure N</span><sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption experiments at 77 K and 273 K were performed on them. Through these experiments, it was observed that, with crushing of samples to smaller particle sizes low-pressure N<sub>2</sub><span> adsorption tend to show higher values for total pore volume and average pore diameter. The mean difference over all samples for average pore diameter between M4 and M1 particle size is closer to 1 nm. Similarly, the mean difference over all samples for total pore volume between M4 and M1 particle sizes of all samples is 0.005 cc/g, which is almost closer to their micropore volumes. Such inconsistencies in measurements can lead to serious errors in shale gas exploration. Further, the low pressure N</span><sub>2</sub> experiments indicated that M4 particle size samples show higher values of pore structure parameters, and low pressure CO<sub>2</sub> experiments show that M3 particle size shows higher micropore volumes. For further understanding of nano-sized pore contributions, micropore size distributions of the samples have been constructed using Stoeckli pore size distribution function. From these distributions and other analysis, it was concluded that the smallest particle size overestimates the pore structure parameters and M3 particle size is optimum for both low pressure N<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 104746"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187551002200333X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Micropores play a significant role in adsorption and are abundant in a shale pore structure. The influence of particle size on pore structure parameters, especially micropores, is a subject of primary interest for shale gas characterisation. In this work, a total of 6 samples with varying mineralogical and organic content are selected from 2 Indian sedimentary basins, Cambay and Krishna-Godavari. Selected samples were crushed to different particle sizes 500-425 μm (M1), 425-250 μm (M2), 250-150 μm (M3), and 150-75 μm (M4) and low pressure N2 and CO2 adsorption experiments at 77 K and 273 K were performed on them. Through these experiments, it was observed that, with crushing of samples to smaller particle sizes low-pressure N2 adsorption tend to show higher values for total pore volume and average pore diameter. The mean difference over all samples for average pore diameter between M4 and M1 particle size is closer to 1 nm. Similarly, the mean difference over all samples for total pore volume between M4 and M1 particle sizes of all samples is 0.005 cc/g, which is almost closer to their micropore volumes. Such inconsistencies in measurements can lead to serious errors in shale gas exploration. Further, the low pressure N2 experiments indicated that M4 particle size samples show higher values of pore structure parameters, and low pressure CO2 experiments show that M3 particle size shows higher micropore volumes. For further understanding of nano-sized pore contributions, micropore size distributions of the samples have been constructed using Stoeckli pore size distribution function. From these distributions and other analysis, it was concluded that the smallest particle size overestimates the pore structure parameters and M3 particle size is optimum for both low pressure N2 and CO2 adsorption.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market.
An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.