A half doubling dose change in bronchial hyperresponsiveness in a population represents an important difference.

Translational respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2013-12-01 Epub Date: 2013-02-27 DOI:10.1186/2213-0802-1-4
Mark Weatherall, James Fingleton, Sally Eyers, Richard Beasley
{"title":"A half doubling dose change in bronchial hyperresponsiveness in a population represents an important difference.","authors":"Mark Weatherall,&nbsp;James Fingleton,&nbsp;Sally Eyers,&nbsp;Richard Beasley","doi":"10.1186/2213-0802-1-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of asthma has increased over recent decades and the reasons for this are poorly understood. A sensitive tool that can evaluate potential risk factors for asthma is bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), a key physiological characteristic of asthma. However, although the minimum clinically important difference in BHR for an individual is accepted to be around one doubling dose, the minimum important change in a population is not defined. As with surrogate measures of cardiovascular disease risk such as blood pressure and cholesterol, a change that is not clinically important in an individual may be extremely important in public health terms.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>To assess the potential impact of a small absolute change in BHR across a population, we modelled the effect of different changes in BHR on the prevalence rates of moderate and severe BHR in an asthmatic population. We calculate that a one half doubling dose increase in BHR increases the prevalence of moderate and severe BHR by 30%. If this was accompanied by an equivalent increase in the population prevalence of moderate and severe asthma, this would be highly significant in public health terms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We propose that a one half doubling dose worsening in BHR across a population may represent an important change.</p>","PeriodicalId":90074,"journal":{"name":"Translational respiratory medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2213-0802-1-4","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2213-0802-1-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of asthma has increased over recent decades and the reasons for this are poorly understood. A sensitive tool that can evaluate potential risk factors for asthma is bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), a key physiological characteristic of asthma. However, although the minimum clinically important difference in BHR for an individual is accepted to be around one doubling dose, the minimum important change in a population is not defined. As with surrogate measures of cardiovascular disease risk such as blood pressure and cholesterol, a change that is not clinically important in an individual may be extremely important in public health terms.

Findings: To assess the potential impact of a small absolute change in BHR across a population, we modelled the effect of different changes in BHR on the prevalence rates of moderate and severe BHR in an asthmatic population. We calculate that a one half doubling dose increase in BHR increases the prevalence of moderate and severe BHR by 30%. If this was accompanied by an equivalent increase in the population prevalence of moderate and severe asthma, this would be highly significant in public health terms.

Conclusions: We propose that a one half doubling dose worsening in BHR across a population may represent an important change.

Abstract Image

人群中支气管高反应性的半倍剂量变化代表了一个重要的差异。
背景:近几十年来,哮喘的患病率有所增加,其原因尚不清楚。支气管高反应性(BHR)是评估哮喘潜在危险因素的一个敏感工具,它是哮喘的一个关键生理特征。然而,尽管个体BHR的最小临床重要差异被认为约为一倍剂量,但人群的最小重要变化尚未确定。与测量心血管疾病风险的替代指标(如血压和胆固醇)一样,一个对个人临床上不重要的变化,可能在公共卫生方面极为重要。研究结果:为了评估人群中BHR的微小绝对变化的潜在影响,我们模拟了不同的BHR变化对哮喘人群中中度和重度BHR患病率的影响。我们计算出,如果BHR剂量增加一倍半,中度和重度BHR的患病率就会增加30%。如果这同时伴随着中度和重度哮喘患病率的相应增加,这在公共卫生方面将是非常重要的。结论:我们认为,在人群中,BHR剂量加倍一半的恶化可能代表着一个重要的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书