NO-FAULT COMPENSATION FOR MEDICAL INJURIES: TRENDS AND CHALLENGES.

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
MEDICINE AND LAW Pub Date : 2014-12-01
Puteri Nemie Kassim
{"title":"NO-FAULT COMPENSATION FOR MEDICAL INJURIES: TRENDS AND CHALLENGES.","authors":"Puteri Nemie Kassim","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>As an alternative to the tort or fault-based system, a no-fault compensation system has been viewed as having the potential to overcome problems inherent in the tort system by providing fair, speedy and adequate compensation for medically injured victims. Proponents of the suggested no-fault compensation system have argued that this system is more efficient in terms of time and money, as well as in making the circumstances in which compensation is paid, much clearer. However, the arguments against no-fault compensation systems are mainly on issues of funding difficulties, accountability and deterrence, particularly, once fault is taken out of the equation. Nonetheless, the no-fault compensation system has been successfully implemented in various countries but, at the same time, rejected in some others, as not being implementable. In the present trend, the no-fault system seems to fit the needs of society by offering greater access to justice for medically injured victims and providing a clearer \"road map\" towards obtaining suitable redress. This paper aims at providing the readers with an overview of the characteristics of the no fault compensation system and some examples of countries that have implemented it.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Qualitative Research-Content Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Given the many problems and hurdles posed by the tort or fault-based system, it is questionable that it can efficiently play its role as a mechanism that affords fair and adequate compensation for victims of medical injuries. However, while a comprehensive no-fault compensation system offers a tempting alternative to the tort or fault-based system, to import such a change into our local scenario requires a great deal of consideration. There are major differences, mainly in terms of social standing, size of population, political ideology and financial commitment, between Malaysia and countries that have successfully implemented no-fault systems. Nevertheless, implementing a no-fault compensation system in Malaysia is not entirely impossible. A custom-made no-fault model tailored to suit our local scenario can be promising, provided that a thorough research is made, assessing the viability of a no-fault system in Malaysia, addressing the inherent problems and, consequently, designing a workable no-fault system in Malaysia.</p>","PeriodicalId":54182,"journal":{"name":"MEDICINE AND LAW","volume":"33 4","pages":"21-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICINE AND LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: As an alternative to the tort or fault-based system, a no-fault compensation system has been viewed as having the potential to overcome problems inherent in the tort system by providing fair, speedy and adequate compensation for medically injured victims. Proponents of the suggested no-fault compensation system have argued that this system is more efficient in terms of time and money, as well as in making the circumstances in which compensation is paid, much clearer. However, the arguments against no-fault compensation systems are mainly on issues of funding difficulties, accountability and deterrence, particularly, once fault is taken out of the equation. Nonetheless, the no-fault compensation system has been successfully implemented in various countries but, at the same time, rejected in some others, as not being implementable. In the present trend, the no-fault system seems to fit the needs of society by offering greater access to justice for medically injured victims and providing a clearer "road map" towards obtaining suitable redress. This paper aims at providing the readers with an overview of the characteristics of the no fault compensation system and some examples of countries that have implemented it.

Methodology: Qualitative Research-Content Analysis.

Results: Given the many problems and hurdles posed by the tort or fault-based system, it is questionable that it can efficiently play its role as a mechanism that affords fair and adequate compensation for victims of medical injuries. However, while a comprehensive no-fault compensation system offers a tempting alternative to the tort or fault-based system, to import such a change into our local scenario requires a great deal of consideration. There are major differences, mainly in terms of social standing, size of population, political ideology and financial commitment, between Malaysia and countries that have successfully implemented no-fault systems. Nevertheless, implementing a no-fault compensation system in Malaysia is not entirely impossible. A custom-made no-fault model tailored to suit our local scenario can be promising, provided that a thorough research is made, assessing the viability of a no-fault system in Malaysia, addressing the inherent problems and, consequently, designing a workable no-fault system in Malaysia.

医疗伤害无过错赔偿:趋势与挑战。
未标明:作为侵权或过错赔偿制度的替代办法,无过错赔偿制度被认为有可能克服侵权制度固有的问题,为医疗受伤的受害者提供公平、迅速和充分的赔偿。建议的无过错赔偿制度的支持者认为,就时间和金钱而言,这种制度更有效率,而且使支付赔偿的情况更加明确。然而,反对无过错赔偿制度的论点主要是在资金困难、问责制和威慑问题上,特别是在排除过错后。尽管如此,无过错赔偿制度已在许多国家成功地实施,但同时在其他一些国家因无法实施而遭到拒绝。在目前的趋势中,无过错制度似乎符合社会的需要,因为它为医疗受伤的受害者提供了更多诉诸司法的机会,并为获得适当补救提供了更明确的"路线图"。本文旨在为读者提供无过失补偿制度的特点概述和一些实施无过失补偿制度的国家的例子。方法:质性研究-内容分析。结果:鉴于侵权或过错为基础的制度所带来的诸多问题和障碍,它能否有效发挥其作为一种机制的作用,为医疗伤害受害者提供公平和充分的赔偿是值得怀疑的。然而,虽然一个全面的无过错赔偿制度为侵权或过错赔偿制度提供了一个诱人的替代方案,但将这种变化引入我们的本地情况需要进行大量考虑。马来西亚与成功实施无过错制度的国家之间存在重大差异,主要体现在社会地位、人口规模、政治意识形态和财政承诺等方面。然而,在马来西亚实施无过错赔偿制度并非完全不可能。如果进行深入的研究,评估马来西亚无故障系统的可行性,解决固有问题,从而设计出可行的马来西亚无故障系统,那么根据我们当地的情况量身定制的无故障模型是有希望的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信