Engaging Urban Parents of Early Adolescents in Parenting Interventions: Home Visits vs. Group Sessions.

School Community Journal Pub Date : 2014-09-01
Nadine M Finigan-Carr, Nikeea Copeland-Linder, Denise L Haynie, Tina L Cheng
{"title":"Engaging Urban Parents of Early Adolescents in Parenting Interventions: Home Visits vs. Group Sessions.","authors":"Nadine M Finigan-Carr,&nbsp;Nikeea Copeland-Linder,&nbsp;Denise L Haynie,&nbsp;Tina L Cheng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interventions targeting parents of young children have shown effectiveness, but research is lacking about best practices for engaging parents of early adolescents. Low levels of enrollment and attendance in parenting interventions present major problems for researchers and clinicians. Effective and efficient ways to engage and collaborate with parents to strengthen parenting practices and to promote healthy development of early adolescents are needed. This exploratory mixed methods study examined the feasibility of three methods of engaging parents in positive parenting activities. Participants were parents of youth ages 11-13 enrolled in three urban, public middle schools in neighborhoods characterized by high rates of community violence. Families (<i>N</i> = 144) were randomized into one of three interventions: six home sessions, two home sessions followed by four group sessions, or six group sessions. The majority of parents were single, non-Hispanic, African American mothers. Urban parents of middle school students were more likely to participate in home visits than in group sessions; offering a combination did not increase participation in the group sessions. As only 34% of those who consented participated in the intervention, qualitative data were examined to explain the reasons for non-participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":53241,"journal":{"name":"School Community Journal","volume":"24 2","pages":"63-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4844490/pdf/nihms-751720.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Community Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interventions targeting parents of young children have shown effectiveness, but research is lacking about best practices for engaging parents of early adolescents. Low levels of enrollment and attendance in parenting interventions present major problems for researchers and clinicians. Effective and efficient ways to engage and collaborate with parents to strengthen parenting practices and to promote healthy development of early adolescents are needed. This exploratory mixed methods study examined the feasibility of three methods of engaging parents in positive parenting activities. Participants were parents of youth ages 11-13 enrolled in three urban, public middle schools in neighborhoods characterized by high rates of community violence. Families (N = 144) were randomized into one of three interventions: six home sessions, two home sessions followed by four group sessions, or six group sessions. The majority of parents were single, non-Hispanic, African American mothers. Urban parents of middle school students were more likely to participate in home visits than in group sessions; offering a combination did not increase participation in the group sessions. As only 34% of those who consented participated in the intervention, qualitative data were examined to explain the reasons for non-participation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

参与城市早期青少年父母的养育干预:家访与小组会议。
针对幼儿父母的干预措施已经显示出效果,但缺乏关于吸引早期青少年父母的最佳做法的研究。对研究人员和临床医生来说,低水平的父母干预的登记和出席率是主要的问题。需要采取有效和高效的方式与父母接触和合作,加强养育做法,促进青少年早期的健康发展。本探索性混合方法研究考察了三种方法使父母参与积极育儿活动的可行性。参与者是在三所城市公立中学就读的11-13岁青少年的父母,这些学校位于社区暴力高发的社区。家庭(N = 144)被随机分配到三种干预措施中的一种:六次家庭治疗,两次家庭治疗后再进行四次小组治疗,或六次小组治疗。大多数父母是单身、非西班牙裔、非裔美国母亲。城市中学生的家长更有可能参加家访而不是小组会议;提供一个组合并没有增加小组会议的参与。由于只有34%的同意者参与了干预,因此对定性数据进行了检查,以解释不参与的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信