{"title":"Poor Performance of the Chlamydia Rapid Test Device for the Detection of Asymptomatic Infections in South African Men: A Pilot Study.","authors":"N S Abbai-Shaik, T Reddy, S Govender, G Ramjee","doi":"10.1155/2016/8695146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no published reports on the diagnostic performance of the Chlamydia Rapid Test (CRT) Device for male urine samples. We evaluated the performance of the CRT Device when compared with that of the BD ProbeTec ET PCR Assay in a population of asymptomatic men. Methods. The study enrolled 100 men between June and July 2015. From each consenting male, 20-30 mL of urine was collected. Sensitivity and specificity of the rapid test compared to PCR were calculated. All analysis was performed in STATA version 13. Results. All men had valid rapid and PCR test results. The test showed a low sensitivity against PCR (20%) (95% CI 3.7-6.2%); however, an excellent specificity was observed (100%) (one sided 97.5% CI: 96.0-100). Conclusions. This test was not found to be suitable as a screening tool for genital Chlamydia infections in men. Our findings emphasize the need for more sensitive POC tests to be developed since the current approach for the management of STIs in Africa is confounded by poor sensitivity and specificity resulting in many infected individuals not being treated. </p>","PeriodicalId":90237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sexually transmitted diseases","volume":"2016 ","pages":"8695146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/8695146","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8695146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Background. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no published reports on the diagnostic performance of the Chlamydia Rapid Test (CRT) Device for male urine samples. We evaluated the performance of the CRT Device when compared with that of the BD ProbeTec ET PCR Assay in a population of asymptomatic men. Methods. The study enrolled 100 men between June and July 2015. From each consenting male, 20-30 mL of urine was collected. Sensitivity and specificity of the rapid test compared to PCR were calculated. All analysis was performed in STATA version 13. Results. All men had valid rapid and PCR test results. The test showed a low sensitivity against PCR (20%) (95% CI 3.7-6.2%); however, an excellent specificity was observed (100%) (one sided 97.5% CI: 96.0-100). Conclusions. This test was not found to be suitable as a screening tool for genital Chlamydia infections in men. Our findings emphasize the need for more sensitive POC tests to be developed since the current approach for the management of STIs in Africa is confounded by poor sensitivity and specificity resulting in many infected individuals not being treated.
背景。据我们所知,目前还没有关于男性尿样衣原体快速检测(CRT)装置诊断性能的公开报告。我们在无症状男性人群中评估了CRT设备与BD ProbeTec ET PCR检测的性能。方法。该研究在2015年6月至7月期间招募了100名男性。从每个同意的男性中收集20-30 mL尿液。计算快速检测与PCR比较的敏感性和特异性。所有分析均在STATA version 13中进行。结果。所有男性均有有效的快速和PCR检测结果。该试验显示对PCR的敏感性较低(20%)(95% CI 3.7-6.2%);然而,观察到极好的特异性(100%)(单侧97.5% CI: 96.0-100)。结论。本试验不适合作为男性生殖器衣原体感染的筛查工具。我们的研究结果强调需要开发更敏感的POC检测方法,因为非洲目前的性传播感染管理方法由于敏感性和特异性差而导致许多感染者没有得到治疗。