Artur César, Maria Cruz, Alberto Mota, Filomena Azevedo
{"title":"Erythroderma. A clinical and etiological study of 103 patients.","authors":"Artur César, Maria Cruz, Alberto Mota, Filomena Azevedo","doi":"10.3315/jdcr.2016.1222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erythroderma is an uncommon and severe dermatological manifestation of a variety of diseases. It is commonly challenging to find the underlying cause.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to analyze the causes of the disease in patients with erythroderma.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data including the clinical symptoms, laboratory examinations, histopathology and follow-up information were collected from patients with erythroderma admitted to our department between 2000 and 2010.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred and three patients diagnosed with erythroderma were identified during this period (11.9% of all hospitalized patients; hospital incidence = 9.4 cases/year). The mean age of onset was 54.4 years (range: 17-89 years) with a male:female ratio of 1.5:1. The most frequent cause of erythroderma was exacerbation of preexisting dermatoses (65.0%), including psoriasis (44.7%) and eczema (16.5%). Drugs (18.4%) and cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (11.7%) induced most of the remaining cases. No cause could be identified in four cases (3.9%). Apart from erythema and scaling, that were present in all patients, clinical findings were dominated by pruritus (97.1%), followed by edema (56.3%), fever (54.4%), palmoplantar keratoderma (50.5%), nail changes (42.7%), liver or spleen enlargement (41.7%) and lymphadenopathy (40.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although numerous clinical features and laboratory values were abnormal, most findings were non-specific. The skin biopsy yielded a positive clinical correlation in most cases. Our study had a high percentage of erythroderma secondary to preexisting skin disease and a relatively low percentage of idiopathic erythroderma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dermatological case reports","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3315/jdcr.2016.1222","citationCount":"57","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dermatological case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3315/jdcr.2016.1222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57
Abstract
Background: Erythroderma is an uncommon and severe dermatological manifestation of a variety of diseases. It is commonly challenging to find the underlying cause.
Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the causes of the disease in patients with erythroderma.
Patients and methods: Data including the clinical symptoms, laboratory examinations, histopathology and follow-up information were collected from patients with erythroderma admitted to our department between 2000 and 2010.
Results: One-hundred and three patients diagnosed with erythroderma were identified during this period (11.9% of all hospitalized patients; hospital incidence = 9.4 cases/year). The mean age of onset was 54.4 years (range: 17-89 years) with a male:female ratio of 1.5:1. The most frequent cause of erythroderma was exacerbation of preexisting dermatoses (65.0%), including psoriasis (44.7%) and eczema (16.5%). Drugs (18.4%) and cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (11.7%) induced most of the remaining cases. No cause could be identified in four cases (3.9%). Apart from erythema and scaling, that were present in all patients, clinical findings were dominated by pruritus (97.1%), followed by edema (56.3%), fever (54.4%), palmoplantar keratoderma (50.5%), nail changes (42.7%), liver or spleen enlargement (41.7%) and lymphadenopathy (40.8%).
Conclusions: Although numerous clinical features and laboratory values were abnormal, most findings were non-specific. The skin biopsy yielded a positive clinical correlation in most cases. Our study had a high percentage of erythroderma secondary to preexisting skin disease and a relatively low percentage of idiopathic erythroderma.