A Coaxial Dielectric Probe Technique for Distinguishing Tooth Enamel from Dental Resin.

Paul M Meaney, Benjamin B Williams, Shireen D Geimer, Ann B Flood, Harold M Swartz
{"title":"A Coaxial Dielectric Probe Technique for Distinguishing Tooth Enamel from Dental Resin.","authors":"Paul M Meaney,&nbsp;Benjamin B Williams,&nbsp;Shireen D Geimer,&nbsp;Ann B Flood,&nbsp;Harold M Swartz","doi":"10.14355/aber.2015.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For purposes of biodosimetry in the event of a large scale radiation disaster, one major and very promising point-of contact device is assessing dose using tooth enamel. This technique utilizes the capabilities of electron paramagnetic resonance to measure free radicals and other unpaired electron species, and the fact that the deposition of energy from ionizing radiation produces free radicals in most materials. An important stipulation for this strategy is that the measurements, need to be performed on a central incisor that is basically intact, i.e. which has an area of enamel surface that is as large as the probing tip of the resonator that is without decay or restorative care that replaces the enamel. Therefore, an important consideration is how to quickly assess whether the tooth has sufficient enamel to be measured for dose and whether there is resin present on the tooth being measured and to be able to characterize the amount of surface that is impacted. While there is a relatively small commercially available dielectric probe which could be used in this context, it has several disadvantages for the intended use. Therefore, a smaller, 1.19mm diameter 50 ohm, open-ended, coaxial dielectric probe has been developed as an alternative. The performance of the custom probe was validated against measurement results of known standards. Measurements were taken of multiple teeth enamel and dental resin samples using both probes. While the probe contact with the teeth samples was imperfect and added to measurement variability, the inherent dielectric contrast between the enamel and resin was sufficient that the probe measurements could be used as a robust means of distinguishing the two material types. The smaller diameter probe produced markedly more definitive results in terms of distinguishing the two materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":91436,"journal":{"name":"Advances in biomedical engineering research","volume":"3 ","pages":"8-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4864612/pdf/nihms-758608.pdf","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in biomedical engineering research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14355/aber.2015.03.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

For purposes of biodosimetry in the event of a large scale radiation disaster, one major and very promising point-of contact device is assessing dose using tooth enamel. This technique utilizes the capabilities of electron paramagnetic resonance to measure free radicals and other unpaired electron species, and the fact that the deposition of energy from ionizing radiation produces free radicals in most materials. An important stipulation for this strategy is that the measurements, need to be performed on a central incisor that is basically intact, i.e. which has an area of enamel surface that is as large as the probing tip of the resonator that is without decay or restorative care that replaces the enamel. Therefore, an important consideration is how to quickly assess whether the tooth has sufficient enamel to be measured for dose and whether there is resin present on the tooth being measured and to be able to characterize the amount of surface that is impacted. While there is a relatively small commercially available dielectric probe which could be used in this context, it has several disadvantages for the intended use. Therefore, a smaller, 1.19mm diameter 50 ohm, open-ended, coaxial dielectric probe has been developed as an alternative. The performance of the custom probe was validated against measurement results of known standards. Measurements were taken of multiple teeth enamel and dental resin samples using both probes. While the probe contact with the teeth samples was imperfect and added to measurement variability, the inherent dielectric contrast between the enamel and resin was sufficient that the probe measurements could be used as a robust means of distinguishing the two material types. The smaller diameter probe produced markedly more definitive results in terms of distinguishing the two materials.

Abstract Image

同轴介质探针技术在牙釉质与牙树脂鉴别中的应用。
为了在大规模辐射灾害中进行生物剂量测定,一种主要且非常有前途的接触点装置是利用牙釉质评估剂量。这项技术利用电子顺磁共振的能力来测量自由基和其他不成对的电子种类,以及电离辐射的能量沉积在大多数材料中产生自由基的事实。该策略的一个重要规定是,测量需要在一个基本完整的中切牙上进行,也就是说,它的牙釉质表面面积与谐振器的探测尖端一样大,没有腐烂或修复护理取代牙釉质。因此,一个重要的考虑是如何快速评估牙齿是否有足够的牙釉质来测量剂量,以及被测量的牙齿上是否存在树脂,并能够表征受影响的表面数量。虽然有一种相对较小的商用介电探针可以用于这种情况,但它对于预期用途有几个缺点。因此,一个更小的,直径1.19毫米50欧姆,开放式,同轴介质探头已被开发作为替代。根据已知标准的测量结果验证了定制探头的性能。使用两种探针对多个牙釉质和牙树脂样品进行测量。虽然探针与牙齿样品的接触是不完美的,并且增加了测量的可变性,但牙釉质和树脂之间固有的介电对比足以使探针测量可用作区分两种材料类型的可靠手段。直径较小的探针在区分两种材料方面产生了明显更明确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书