Neutralization of Virus Infectivity by Antibodies: Old Problems in New Perspectives.

Advances in biology Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-09-09 DOI:10.1155/2014/157895
P J Klasse
{"title":"Neutralization of Virus Infectivity by Antibodies: Old Problems in New Perspectives.","authors":"P J Klasse","doi":"10.1155/2014/157895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) can be both sufficient and necessary for protection against viral infections, although they sometimes act in concert with cellular immunity. Successful vaccines against viruses induce NAbs but vaccine candidates against some major viral pathogens, including HIV-1, have failed to induce potent and effective such responses. Theories of how antibodies neutralize virus infectivity have been formulated and experimentally tested since the 1930s; and controversies about the mechanistic and quantitative bases for neutralization have continually arisen. Soluble versions of native oligomeric viral proteins that mimic the functional targets of neutralizing antibodies now allow the measurement of the relevant affinities of NAbs. Thereby the neutralizing occupancies on virions can be estimated and related to the potency of the NAbs. Furthermore, the kinetics and stoichiometry of NAb binding can be compared with neutralizing efficacy. Recently, the fundamental discovery that the intracellular factor TRIM21 determines the degree of neutralization of adenovirus has provided new mechanistic and quantitative insights. Since TRIM21 resides in the cytoplasm, it would not affect the neutralization of enveloped viruses, but its range of activity against naked viruses will be important to uncover. These developments bring together the old problems of virus neutralization-mechanism, stoichiometry, kinetics, and efficacy-from surprising new angles.</p>","PeriodicalId":91435,"journal":{"name":"Advances in biology","volume":"2014 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/157895","citationCount":"187","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/157895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 187

Abstract

Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) can be both sufficient and necessary for protection against viral infections, although they sometimes act in concert with cellular immunity. Successful vaccines against viruses induce NAbs but vaccine candidates against some major viral pathogens, including HIV-1, have failed to induce potent and effective such responses. Theories of how antibodies neutralize virus infectivity have been formulated and experimentally tested since the 1930s; and controversies about the mechanistic and quantitative bases for neutralization have continually arisen. Soluble versions of native oligomeric viral proteins that mimic the functional targets of neutralizing antibodies now allow the measurement of the relevant affinities of NAbs. Thereby the neutralizing occupancies on virions can be estimated and related to the potency of the NAbs. Furthermore, the kinetics and stoichiometry of NAb binding can be compared with neutralizing efficacy. Recently, the fundamental discovery that the intracellular factor TRIM21 determines the degree of neutralization of adenovirus has provided new mechanistic and quantitative insights. Since TRIM21 resides in the cytoplasm, it would not affect the neutralization of enveloped viruses, but its range of activity against naked viruses will be important to uncover. These developments bring together the old problems of virus neutralization-mechanism, stoichiometry, kinetics, and efficacy-from surprising new angles.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

抗体中和病毒传染性:新视角下的老问题。
中和抗体(nab)对防止病毒感染既充分又必要,尽管它们有时与细胞免疫协同作用。针对病毒的成功疫苗可诱导nab,但针对一些主要病毒病原体(包括HIV-1)的候选疫苗未能诱导强效和有效的这种反应。自20世纪30年代以来,抗体如何中和病毒传染性的理论已经形成并经过实验测试;关于中和的机制基础和定量基础的争论不断出现。原生寡聚病毒蛋白的可溶性版本,模仿中和抗体的功能目标,现在允许测量nab的相关亲和力。因此,可以估计病毒粒子上的中和占用率,并与nab的效力有关。此外,NAb结合的动力学和化学计量学可以与中和效果进行比较。最近,细胞内因子TRIM21决定腺病毒中和程度的基本发现提供了新的机制和定量见解。由于TRIM21存在于细胞质中,它不会影响包膜病毒的中和作用,但揭示其对裸病毒的活性范围将是重要的。这些发展将病毒中和的老问题——机制、化学计量学、动力学和有效性——从令人惊讶的新角度结合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信