Los documentos de voluntades anticipadas. La opinión de los representantes

J.M. Busquets i Font , P. Hernando Robles , R. Font i Canals , G. Diestre Ortin , S. Quintana
{"title":"Los documentos de voluntades anticipadas. La opinión de los representantes","authors":"J.M. Busquets i Font ,&nbsp;P. Hernando Robles ,&nbsp;R. Font i Canals ,&nbsp;G. Diestre Ortin ,&nbsp;S. Quintana","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2016.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The use and usefulness of Advance Directives has led to a lot of controversy about their validity and effectiveness. Those areas are unexplored in our country from the perspective of representatives.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the opinion of the representatives appointed in a registered Statement of Advance Directives (SAD) on the use of this document.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Telephone survey of representatives of 146 already dead people and who, since February 2012, had registered a SAD document.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>More the two-thirds (98) of respondents recalled that the SAD was consulted, with 86 (58.9%) saying that their opinion as representative was consulted, and 120 (82.1%) believe that the patient's will was respected. Of those interviewed, 102 (69.9%) believe that patients who had previously planned their care using a SAD had a good death, with 33 (22.4%) saying it could have been better, and 10 (6.9%) believe they suffered greatly.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The SAD were mostly respected and consulted, and possibly this is related to the fact that most of the representatives declare that the death of those they represented was perceived as comfortable. It would be desirable to conduct further studies addressed at health personnel in order to know their perceptions regarding the use of Advance Directives in the process of dying.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"31 6","pages":"Pages 373-379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2016.02.006","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X16300331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction

The use and usefulness of Advance Directives has led to a lot of controversy about their validity and effectiveness. Those areas are unexplored in our country from the perspective of representatives.

Objective

To determine the opinion of the representatives appointed in a registered Statement of Advance Directives (SAD) on the use of this document.

Methods

Telephone survey of representatives of 146 already dead people and who, since February 2012, had registered a SAD document.

Results

More the two-thirds (98) of respondents recalled that the SAD was consulted, with 86 (58.9%) saying that their opinion as representative was consulted, and 120 (82.1%) believe that the patient's will was respected. Of those interviewed, 102 (69.9%) believe that patients who had previously planned their care using a SAD had a good death, with 33 (22.4%) saying it could have been better, and 10 (6.9%) believe they suffered greatly.

Conclusion

The SAD were mostly respected and consulted, and possibly this is related to the fact that most of the representatives declare that the death of those they represented was perceived as comfortable. It would be desirable to conduct further studies addressed at health personnel in order to know their perceptions regarding the use of Advance Directives in the process of dying.

预先遗嘱的文件。代表们的意见
预先指示的使用和有用性导致了许多关于其有效性和有效性的争议。从代表的角度来看,这些领域在我国尚未开发。目的确定已注册的预先指示声明(SAD)中指定的代表对本文件使用的意见。方法对146名已经死亡的人的代表进行电话调查,这些人自2012年2月以来登记了SAD文件。结果超过三分之二(98人)的受访者回忆曾咨询过SAD,其中86人(58.9%)表示曾代表他们征询意见,120人(82.1%)认为患者的意愿得到了尊重。在接受采访的人中,102人(69.9%)认为先前使用SAD计划治疗的患者有一个良好的死亡,33人(22.4%)表示可以更好,10人(6.9%)认为他们遭受了巨大的痛苦。结论:大多数人都尊重并咨询了SAD,这可能与大多数代表声称他们所代表的人的死亡被认为是舒适的有关。最好对保健人员进行进一步的研究,以了解他们对在死亡过程中使用预先指示的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信