INTERACTION PATTERN OF FULLERENES (C20-C180) AND CARBON NANOTUBES WITH DIFFERENT FORMS OF DNA: A COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY APPROACH.

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Theoretical Biology Forum Pub Date : 2015-01-01
Sumbul Firdaus, Anupam Dhasmana, Shafiul Haque, Snober S Mir, Roshan Jahan, Tasneem Bano, Vandana Srivastava, Saif Khan, Mohtashim Lohani
{"title":"INTERACTION PATTERN OF FULLERENES (C20-C180) AND CARBON NANOTUBES WITH DIFFERENT FORMS OF DNA: A COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY APPROACH.","authors":"Sumbul Firdaus,&nbsp;Anupam Dhasmana,&nbsp;Shafiul Haque,&nbsp;Snober S Mir,&nbsp;Roshan Jahan,&nbsp;Tasneem Bano,&nbsp;Vandana Srivastava,&nbsp;Saif Khan,&nbsp;Mohtashim Lohani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, the venues of exposure to nanoparticles have increased significantly owing to their increased deliberate production. In this study the interaction of fullerenes with DNA was analyzed along with various factors affecting this interaction like mol. wt. of fullerenes (C20 to C180), the form of DNA i.e., A, B and Z, and sequences of DNA, and was compared with the DNA binding of CNTs. Increase in the molecular weight of the fullerene showed increase in the binding score with A & B-form of DNA, but no regular affect was seen on binding with Z-form of DNA. Although the binding of all fullerenes was best with A form. While CNTs bind with all forms of DNA, but best scores were with B form, which were comparable with those of fullerene C80 and C84 with A form. The interaction of both fullerenes and CNTs were not affected by the sequence of DNA. The number of interacting base pairs increased from 1 base-pair to 4, as the molecular size of fullerene increases in all A & B-and Z form of DNA. Whereas CNTs interact with 5 bases in A and B form, and 3 bases in Z form. The groove where binding occurs depended on the form of DNA. Smaller (< C48) fullerenes bind in minor groove of B-DNA, and larger fullerenes bind in major groove. While in A form of DNA, fullerenes of all sizes bind in major groove. The binding was random and not size dependent in Z form of DNA. Whereas, CNTs bind to major groove of DNA in a parallel fashion in A and B form of DNA, and in minor groove attached perpendicularly in Z form.</p>","PeriodicalId":54453,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Biology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, the venues of exposure to nanoparticles have increased significantly owing to their increased deliberate production. In this study the interaction of fullerenes with DNA was analyzed along with various factors affecting this interaction like mol. wt. of fullerenes (C20 to C180), the form of DNA i.e., A, B and Z, and sequences of DNA, and was compared with the DNA binding of CNTs. Increase in the molecular weight of the fullerene showed increase in the binding score with A & B-form of DNA, but no regular affect was seen on binding with Z-form of DNA. Although the binding of all fullerenes was best with A form. While CNTs bind with all forms of DNA, but best scores were with B form, which were comparable with those of fullerene C80 and C84 with A form. The interaction of both fullerenes and CNTs were not affected by the sequence of DNA. The number of interacting base pairs increased from 1 base-pair to 4, as the molecular size of fullerene increases in all A & B-and Z form of DNA. Whereas CNTs interact with 5 bases in A and B form, and 3 bases in Z form. The groove where binding occurs depended on the form of DNA. Smaller (< C48) fullerenes bind in minor groove of B-DNA, and larger fullerenes bind in major groove. While in A form of DNA, fullerenes of all sizes bind in major groove. The binding was random and not size dependent in Z form of DNA. Whereas, CNTs bind to major groove of DNA in a parallel fashion in A and B form of DNA, and in minor groove attached perpendicularly in Z form.

富勒烯(c20-c180)和碳纳米管与不同形式dna的相互作用模式:计算生物学方法。
最近,由于纳米颗粒的故意生产增加,暴露于纳米颗粒的场所显着增加。本研究分析了富勒烯与DNA的相互作用,以及影响这种相互作用的各种因素,如富勒烯的分子量(C20 ~ C180)、DNA的形式(A、B、Z)和DNA的序列,并与碳纳米管的DNA结合进行了比较。随着富勒烯分子量的增加,其与A型和b型DNA的结合得分均有所增加,但对与z型DNA的结合没有规律性的影响。虽然所有富勒烯与A型的结合效果最好。虽然碳纳米管与所有形式的DNA结合,但与B形式的结合得分最高,与富勒烯C80和C84与A形式的结合得分相当。富勒烯和碳纳米管的相互作用不受DNA序列的影响。在所有A、b和Z形式的DNA中,随着富勒烯分子大小的增加,相互作用的碱基对的数量从1个增加到4个。而碳纳米管与5种A型和B型碱基以及3种Z型碱基相互作用。发生结合的凹槽取决于DNA的形式。较小的富勒烯(< C48)结合在B-DNA的小凹槽中,较大的富勒烯结合在大凹槽中。而在A型DNA中,各种大小的富勒烯结合在主槽中。这种结合是随机的,不依赖于Z型DNA的大小。然而,碳纳米管在DNA的a型和B型中以平行方式结合在DNA的主凹槽上,在Z型中以垂直方式结合在小凹槽上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Theoretical Biology Forum
Theoretical Biology Forum 生物-生物学
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信