The Evaluation of Syncope in a Predominantly Black Population: Focus on Neuroimaging.

Agazi G Gebreselassie, Delamo I Bekele, Yonette Paul, Julius S Ngwa, Daniel A Larbi
{"title":"The Evaluation of Syncope in a Predominantly Black Population: Focus on Neuroimaging.","authors":"Agazi G Gebreselassie,&nbsp;Delamo I Bekele,&nbsp;Yonette Paul,&nbsp;Julius S Ngwa,&nbsp;Daniel A Larbi","doi":"10.4103/1947-2714.187133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines do not support the routine use of computed tomography (CT) scan of the head in the diagnostic workup of syncope. There is a lack of research to support whether these guidelines apply to the Black population.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the yield of neuroimaging in the evaluation of Syncope in a predominantly Black patient population and to test whether current guidelines based on studies conducted in other populations hold true in this group.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of records of 151 patients admitted to a University Hospital with Syncope from 2011 to 2014 was performed. Data collected include CT head, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, magnetic resonance angiogram, electroencephalogram, and orthostatic vital signs. Demographic data, admitting service, and comorbid conditions were identified. Syncope was classified as cardiogenic, orthostatic, vasovagal, situational, or undetermined. Statistical analysis was performed to determine which diagnostic tools were useful in identifying the potential causes of syncope. Data analysis was conducted using the Statistical Analysis System software 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and Statistical Analysis and Graphics (NCSS 9.0.7, Kaysville, UT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty eight (84.8%) of the patients were Black. The average age was 56.62 ± 18.78 standard deviation and 68.2% (103) were female. One hundred and fourteen patients (75.5%) had a CT brain. Five out of 114 patients had an acute abnormality on CT (4.4%). Only 1 of these 5 patients had an abnormality that was related to syncope. CT brain (P = 0.978) was not found to be predictive of underlying etiology of syncope despite high frequency of use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT head was not useful in determining the etiology of syncope in a predominantly Black population. Current guidelines and studies conducted in other populations have detected similar findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19703,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"8 7","pages":"279-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/81/6b/NAJMS-8-279.PMC4982356.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.187133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines do not support the routine use of computed tomography (CT) scan of the head in the diagnostic workup of syncope. There is a lack of research to support whether these guidelines apply to the Black population.

Aims: This study aims to evaluate the yield of neuroimaging in the evaluation of Syncope in a predominantly Black patient population and to test whether current guidelines based on studies conducted in other populations hold true in this group.

Material and methods: A retrospective review of records of 151 patients admitted to a University Hospital with Syncope from 2011 to 2014 was performed. Data collected include CT head, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, magnetic resonance angiogram, electroencephalogram, and orthostatic vital signs. Demographic data, admitting service, and comorbid conditions were identified. Syncope was classified as cardiogenic, orthostatic, vasovagal, situational, or undetermined. Statistical analysis was performed to determine which diagnostic tools were useful in identifying the potential causes of syncope. Data analysis was conducted using the Statistical Analysis System software 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and Statistical Analysis and Graphics (NCSS 9.0.7, Kaysville, UT).

Results: One hundred and twenty eight (84.8%) of the patients were Black. The average age was 56.62 ± 18.78 standard deviation and 68.2% (103) were female. One hundred and fourteen patients (75.5%) had a CT brain. Five out of 114 patients had an acute abnormality on CT (4.4%). Only 1 of these 5 patients had an abnormality that was related to syncope. CT brain (P = 0.978) was not found to be predictive of underlying etiology of syncope despite high frequency of use.

Conclusions: CT head was not useful in determining the etiology of syncope in a predominantly Black population. Current guidelines and studies conducted in other populations have detected similar findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评价晕厥在一个主要的黑人人口:重点神经影像学。
背景:目前的指南不支持在晕厥的诊断检查中常规使用头部计算机断层扫描(CT)。目前还缺乏研究来支持这些指导方针是否适用于黑人。目的:本研究旨在评估以黑人为主的晕厥患者群体中神经影像学评估的结果,并测试基于其他人群研究的现行指南是否适用于该群体。材料与方法:回顾性分析2011 - 2014年在某大学附属医院收治的151例晕厥患者的资料。收集的数据包括头部CT、脑磁共振成像、磁共振血管造影、脑电图和直立生命体征。确定了人口统计数据、入院服务和合并症。晕厥分为心源性、直立性、血管迷走神经性、情境性和不确定性。进行统计分析以确定哪些诊断工具对确定晕厥的潜在原因有用。使用统计分析系统软件9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC)和统计分析与图形(NCSS 9.0.7, Kaysville, UT)进行数据分析。结果:黑人128例,占84.8%。平均年龄56.62±18.78标准差,女性占68.2%(103例)。114例患者(75.5%)有CT脑。114例患者中有5例(4.4%)出现急性CT异常。这5例患者中只有1例有与晕厥有关的异常。CT脑扫描虽然使用频率高,但不能预测晕厥的潜在病因(P = 0.978)。结论:在黑人为主的人群中,CT头部检查不能确定晕厥的病因。目前的指南和在其他人群中进行的研究也发现了类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信