Applying an Instance-specific Model to Longitudinal Clinical Data for Prediction.

Emily Watt, James W Sayre, Alex A T Bui
{"title":"Applying an Instance-specific Model to Longitudinal Clinical Data for Prediction.","authors":"Emily Watt,&nbsp;James W Sayre,&nbsp;Alex A T Bui","doi":"10.1109/HISB.2011.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dynamic Bayesian Belief networks (DBNs) have been commonly used to represent temporal data in several domains; however, an ideal representation requires a near perfect mapping between the process being modeled and the DBN. Furthermore, DBNs assume a full set of observations collected at a fixed frequency. Bayesian model selection has arisen to address biased inference and underlying assumptions about the data (e.g., distribution, representativeness) to choose a model that best fits the given observations. Per patient case, a Bayesian model is generated to maximize specificity, and the collective set of models is averaged to fit all examples. This paper demonstrates the advantages of patient-specific modeling over a DBN-driven approach. Results evaluating this approach are presented based on models for two longitudinal clinical datasets (neuro-oncology, knee osteoarthritis). Largely, the patient-specific models show improved performance in prediction relative to the DBNs.</p>","PeriodicalId":91600,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, Imaging and Systems Biology","volume":"2011 ","pages":"81-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/HISB.2011.12","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, Imaging and Systems Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HISB.2011.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Dynamic Bayesian Belief networks (DBNs) have been commonly used to represent temporal data in several domains; however, an ideal representation requires a near perfect mapping between the process being modeled and the DBN. Furthermore, DBNs assume a full set of observations collected at a fixed frequency. Bayesian model selection has arisen to address biased inference and underlying assumptions about the data (e.g., distribution, representativeness) to choose a model that best fits the given observations. Per patient case, a Bayesian model is generated to maximize specificity, and the collective set of models is averaged to fit all examples. This paper demonstrates the advantages of patient-specific modeling over a DBN-driven approach. Results evaluating this approach are presented based on models for two longitudinal clinical datasets (neuro-oncology, knee osteoarthritis). Largely, the patient-specific models show improved performance in prediction relative to the DBNs.

将实例特定模型应用于纵向临床数据预测。
动态贝叶斯信念网络(dbn)已被广泛用于表示多个领域的时间数据;然而,理想的表示需要在被建模的流程和DBN之间实现近乎完美的映射。此外,dbn假设以固定频率收集的全套观测数据。贝叶斯模型选择的出现是为了解决关于数据的有偏见的推断和潜在的假设(例如,分布,代表性),以选择最适合给定观察的模型。根据每个病例,生成一个贝叶斯模型以最大化特异性,并对模型集合进行平均以拟合所有示例。本文演示了特定于患者的建模相对于dbn驱动方法的优势。评估这种方法的结果是基于两个纵向临床数据集(神经肿瘤学,膝关节骨关节炎)的模型。在很大程度上,与dbn相比,患者特异性模型在预测方面表现出更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信